Organizations: XJTLU · University of Liverpool · China University of Petroleum (East China) · University of Science and Technology Beijing · Beijing Jiaotong University
Referring image segmentation aims to segment specific targets based on a natural text expression. Recently, parameter-efficient tuning (PET) has emerged as a promising paradigm. However, existing PET-based methods often suffer from the fact that visual features can't emphasize the text-referred target instance but activate co-category yet unrelated objects. We analyze and quantify this problem, terming it the non-target activation' (NTA) issue. To address this, we propose a novel framework, TALENT, which utilizes target-aware efficient tuning for PET-based RIS. Specifically, we first propose a Rectified Cost Aggregator (RCA) to efficiently aggregate text-referred features. Then, to calibrate NTA' into accurate target activation, we adopt a Target-aware Learning Mechanism (TLM), including contextual pairwise consistency learning and target-centric contrastive learning. The former uses the sentence-level text feature to achieve a holistic understanding of the referent and constructs a text-referred affinity map to optimize the semantic association of visual features. The latter further enhances target localization to discover the distinct instance while suppressing associations with other unrelated ones. The two objectives work in concert and address `NTA' effectively. Extensive evaluations show that TALENT outperforms existing methods across various metrics (e.g., 2.5% mIoU gains on G-Ref val set). Our codes will be released at: https://github.com/Kimsure/TALENT.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Visual feature activation and segmentation maps. (a) Text descriptions. (b) Visual-text fusion in DETRIS [ 15 ] , which activates co-category foreground objects. (c) Our TALENT, which emphasizes the text-referred target instance. (d) Segmentation result of the ground truth (GT). (e)-(f) Corresponding segmentation results of DETRIS [ 15 ] and our TALENT.
Figure 2: Comparison of ‘NTA’ influence quantization among various methods on the selected subset of different benchmarks.
Figure 3: Framework pipeline of our TALENT. It contains four main modules: a frozen backbone building upon DINOv2-Reg and CLIP to encode the image and text, a rectified cost aggregator for vision-language interaction, a target-aware learning mechanism to strengthen feature representation, and a transformer decoder for final segmentation.
Methods
PET
Metirc
RefCOCO
RefCOCO+
G-Ref
val
testA
testB
val
testA
testB
val(u)
test(u)
val(g)
LAVT † [ 59 ]
✘
oIoU
72.7
75.8
68.8
62.1
68.4
55.1
61.2
62.1
60.5
DMMI [ 13 ]
✘
74.1
77.1
70.2
64.0
69.7
57.0
63.5
64.2
61.2
ReLA [ 28 ]
✘
73.8
76.5
70.2
66.0
71.0
57.7
65.0
66.0
62.7
CG-former [ 49 ]
✘
74.8
77.3
70.6
64.5
71.0
57.1
64.7
65.1
62.5
LISA-Vicuna-13B [ 25 ]
✘
71.7
74.7
68.1
59.4
64.2
52.9
65.2
66.1
-
Table 1: Quantitative comparison of our method against other PFT-based and PET-based methods on different benchmarks, evaluated using the oIoU and mIoU metrics. † denotes the re-implemented results, while others are directly sourced from the reported results. u: The UMD partition. g: The Google partition. The best results are marked with bold .
Table 2: Quantitative comparison using the Precision@X metric on the val-test set of RefCOCO.
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison. We compare our TALENT with ETRIS [ 55 ] , ETOG [ 61 ] , and DETRIS [ 15 ] . It’s observed that TALENT can accurately localize the target and generate more precise segmentation results.
Figure 5: Visualization of feature activation maps. We compare TALENT with the existing SOTA method DETRIS [ 15 ] .
Methods
Params. (backbone)
Params. (other modules)
Params. (overall)
mIoU (Avg.)
CRIS [ 54 ]
57.31M
103.94M
161.25M
63.8
LoRA † [ 11 ]
0.03M
23.98M
24.01M
60.4
Compacter † [ 21 ]
0.19M
23.98M
24.17M
61.3
ETRIS † [ 55 ]
1.94M
23.98M
25.92M
62.8
BarLeRIa [ 51 ]
2.21M
23.98M
26.19M
66.5
DETRIS † [ 15 ]
2.71M
22.84M
26.69M
70.4
Table 3: Comparison of parameters and average segment performance on three benchmarks. † indicates the results are calculated from the official implementation of DETRIS [ 17 ] and ETRIS [ 55 ] .
RCA
CPCL
TCCL
RefCOCO-mIoU(%)
AVG(%)
NTA-IoU(%)
val
testA
testB
✘
✘
✘
74.9
77.1
71.9
74.6
9.9
✔
✘
✘
76.0
77.9
73.3
75.7
8.2
✔
✔
✘
77.2
78.7
74.1
76.7
4.5
✔
✘
✔
76.8
78.4
73.8
76.3
3.7
✔
✔
✔
77.8
79.4
74.8
77.3
2.1
Table 4: Ablation results on each proposed module to validate the performance impact using the mIoU and NTA-IoU metrics.
Settings
Architecture
RefCOCO-mIoU(%)
val
testA
testB
#1
νi+1(fvti)
71.8
76.0
70.1
#2
νi+1(fvti)∗φ
71.1
74.5
68.9
#3
cat(νi+1(fvi),fvti)
76.1
77.9
73.2
#4
cat(νi+1(fvi),fvti∗φ)
76.6
78.8
73.9
#5
νi+1(fvi)+fvti
77.1
78.7
74.1
Table 5: Ablation results on different feature aggregation architectures of Eq. 4 . cat(⋅) means to concatenate the two input features and then use an MLP for channel reduction.
λcpcl
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
λtccl
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
val
76.9
77.2
77.5
77.4
77.6
77.8
77.2
76.8
testA
78.5
78.6
79.1
78.9
79.1
79.4
78.7
78.4
testB
74.3
74.3
74.4
74.2
74.6
74.8
74.1
73.8
Table 6: Ablation results on each loss scaling coefficient.
V-L interaction
TLM
RefCOCO
Avg
CPCL
TCCL
val
testA
testB
✘
✘
✘
74.9
77.1
71.9
74.6
RCA
✘
✘
76.0
77.9
73.3
75.7
RCA
✔
✔
77.8
79.4
74.8
77.3
cross-attention
✘
✘
75.4
77.3
72.4
75.0
cross-attention
✔
✔
77.3
78.9
74.1
76.8
Table 7: Ablation experiments on applying CPCL and TCCL to different visual-text interaction mechanisms.
Figure 6: Ablation results of the evaluation of the loss scaling coefficient for our CPCL and TCCL. Each colored line corresponds to a specific CPCL coefficient.
Figure 7: Visualization of segmentation results. We compare our TALENT with existing PET-based methods. It’s observed that TALENT can generate more precise segmentation maps.
Figure 8: Visualization of feature activation maps. We compare TALENT with the SOTA PET-based method DETRIS [ 15 ] .
Referring Image Segmentation (RIS) aims to segment the object in an image uniquely referred to by a natural language expression. However, RIS training often contains hard-to-align and instance-specific visual signals; optimizing on such pixels injects misleading gradients and drives the model in the wrong direction. By explicitly estimating pixel-level vision-language alignment, the learner can suppress low-alignment regions, concentrate on reliable cues, and acquire more generalizable alignment features. In this paper, we propose Alignment-Aware Masked Learning (AML), a simple yet effective training strategy that quantifies region-referent alignment (PMME) and filters out unreliable pixels during optimization (AFM). Specifically, each sample first computes a similarity map between visual and textual features, and then masks out pixels falling below an adaptive similarity threshold, thereby excluding poorly aligned regions from the training process. AML does not require architectural changes and incurs no inference overhead, directing attention to the areas aligned with the textual description. Experiments on the RefCOCO (vanilla/+/g) datasets show that AML achieves state-of-the-art results across all 8 splits, and beyond improving RIS performance, AML also enhances the model's robustness to diverse descriptions and scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/pipashu1/AMLRIS.
Tongfei Chen, Shuo Yang, Yuguang Yang +7
School of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, China · School of Electronic Information Engineering, Beihang University, China · AI Research, Qihoo 360, China +3
Referring image segmentation aims to localize and segment a target object in an image based on a free-form referring expression. The core challenge lies in effectively bridging linguistic descriptions with object-level visual representations, especially when referring expressions involve detailed attributes and complex inter-object relationships. Existing methods either rely on cross-modal alignment or employ Semantic Segmentation Prompts, but they often lack explicit reasoning mechanisms for grounding language descriptions to target regions in the image. To address these limitations, we propose PPCR, a Progressive Prompt-guided Cross-modal Reasoning framework for referring image segmentation. PPCR explicitly structures the reasoning process as a Semantic Understanding-Spatial Grounding-Instance Segmentation pipeline. Specifically, PPCR first employs multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to generate Semantic Segmentation Prompt that capture key semantic cues of the target object. Based on this semantic context, Spatial Segmentation Prompt are further generated to reason about object location and spatial extent, enabling a progressive transition from semantic understanding to spatial grounding. The Semantic and Spatial Segmentation prompts are then jointly integrated into the segmentation module to guide accurate target localization and segmentation. Extensive experiments on standard referring image segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that PPCR consistently outperforms existing methods. The code will be publicly released to facilitate reproducibility.
Jiachen Li, Hongyun Wang, Jinyu Xu +5
School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China · School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China · University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China +1
Referring Expression Segmentation (RES) links natural-language descriptions to pixel-level object masks. Yet standard evaluation provides limited insight into instance-level referential reasoning: it does not systematically distinguish referential logics, test target preservation across valid grounding paths, or separate target-selection from mask-generation errors. We introduce InstanceBench, an instance-centered diagnostic benchmark comprising 6,194 images, 9,264 target instances, and 25,077 human-verified expressions. Each target-centric expression set (TCES) fixes the image and target mask while pairing a minimal expression with a same-target variant that uses another valid cue or grounding path. A compact referential-logic taxonomy spans direct target evidence, same-class selection, relational and compositional grounding, and exclusion, while logic-critical construction suppresses simpler shortcuts. Identity-aware metrics measure target retention and set-level success while separating selection from mask-generation errors. Across 22 native-mask RES checkpoints from 18 model families, the strongest checkpoint reaches 67.1% mIoU but only 59.6% [email protected]. Controlled interventions confirm language sensitivity, while failure decomposition identifies target selection rather than mask decoding as the main bottleneck. On a controlled training subset, matched supervision improves identity-aware performance, showing that the diagnosed capability responds to targeted supervision. Collectively, InstanceBench supports a measure-diagnose-improve cycle: measuring target consistency across grounding paths, localizing failure sources, and evaluating targeted interventions.
Yuchen Li, Shaoyang Zhou, Yiran Wang +5
The University of Sydney · The ATLAS Institute · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory