Organizations: School of Computer Science, Wuhan University · College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University · School of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University · School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University · Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University
Current remote sensing vision-language models (RS VLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in image interpretation but rely on static training data, limiting their ability to accommodate continuously emerging sensing modalities and downstream tasks. This exposes a fundamental challenge: enabling RS VLMs to continually adapt without catastrophic forgetting. Despite its practical importance, the continual learning capability of RS VLMs remains underexplored, and no dedicated benchmark currently exists. In this work, we present CLeaRS, a comprehensive benchmark for continual vision-language learning in remote sensing. CLeaRS comprises 10 curated subsets with over 207k image-text pairs, spanning diverse interpretation tasks, sensing modalities, and application scenarios. We further define three evaluation protocols: long-horizon, modality-incremental, and task-incremental settings, to systematically assess continual adaptation. Extensive benchmarking of diverse vision-language models reveals catastrophic forgetting across all settings. Moreover, representative continual learning methods, when adapted to RS VLMs, exhibit limited effectiveness in handling task, instruction, and modality transitions. Our findings underscore the need for developing continual learning methods tailored to RS VLMs.
Figures & tables
Dataset
Image Modality
Interpretation Task
#Train
#Test
Data Source
AID
Optical
Scene Classification
8,000 (8,000)
2,000 (2,000)
AID
VRS-Cap
Optical
Image Captioning
7,833 (7,833)
2,340 (2,340)
VRSBench
VRS-VG
Optical
Visual Grounding
14,569 (7,812)
4,416 (2,324)
VRSBench
VRS-VQA
Optical
Visual Question Answering
16,258 (4,612)
17,018 (4,680)
VRSBench
SAR-VG
SAR
Visual Grounding
9,976 (8,000)
2,730 (2,157)
SARDet-100K
SAR-VQA
SAR
Visual Question Answering
20,000 (8,000)
5,000 (2,000)
SARLANG-1M
Table 1: Dataset statistics of the CLeaRS benchmark. The image modality includes SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar), optical, and IR (infrared). For the #Train and #Test columns, a (b) indicates the number of image-text pairs and images, respectively.
Figure 1: The CLeaRS benchmark comprises 10 subsets that progressively cover diverse interpretation tasks, sensing modalities, and application scenarios, facilitating systematic investigation of continual vision-language learning behaviors in RS VLMs.
Figure 2: Statistics of the newly constructed subsets in CLeaRS. The remaining subsets are adapted from existing image-text datasets and detailed in Appendix.
VLMs
Qwen2.5-VL [ 45 ]
MiniGPT-v2 [ 46 ]
LLaVA-1.5 [ 47 ]
GeoChat [ 3 ]
VHM [ 7 ]
Joint
Inst.
Final
Joint
Inst.
Final
Joint
Inst.
Final
Joint
Inst.
Final
Joint
Inst.
Final
Long-Horizon Setting
AID
84.0
82.1
80.9
97.4
97.6
46.0
94.9
95.3
76.6
95.3
95.1
66.9
95.6
98.8
16.2
VRS-Cap
20.6
12.0
0.1
13.1
12.1
0.2
22.6
17.4
0.4
22.9
16.1
0.0
23.4
17.8
0.4
VRS-VG
35.4
10.9
15.2
25.8
6.2
0.9
21.0
8.5
1.8
33.7
25.2
12.5
16.3
6.7
0.2
VRS-VQA
66.9
68.7
66.8
69.1
70.1
53.1
71.8
71.3
59.6
72.6
72.6
57.9
72.8
72.4
43.1
Table 2: Benchmarking VLMs on CLeaRS. Joint corresponds to joint training on all subsets. Inst. reports performance immediately after each subset, while Final denotes performance after the last subset, both under sequential fine-tuning.
Figure 3: Comparison of VHM with and without supervised fine-tuning in the task-incremental setting.
Figure 4: Analysis of factors contributing to forgetting in RS VLMs.
Methods
Long-Horizon
Modality-Incremental
Task-Incremental
MFT
MFN
MAA
BWT
MFT
MFN
MAA
BWT
MFT
MFN
MAA
BWT
Sequential FT
51.9
27.8
35.3
-26.8
41.8
24.2
15.7
-21.2
57.6
35.3
45.0
-29.8
MoELoRA [ 25 ]
53.2
29.1
37.2
-26.8
41.8
31.6
17.1
-12.2
56.7
34.7
46.1
-29.4
HiDe-LLaVA [ 26 ]
49.4
27.7
32.8
-24.1
40.9
31.2
16.0
-11.6
56.1
31.4
43.9
-32.9
SEFE [ 29 ]
52.9
27.5
37.2
-28.3
43.8
33.1
18.2
-12.8
59.1
37.2
49.7
-29.1
Table 3: Performance of continual learning methods on CLeaRS. All methods use VHM as the backbone model for fair comparison.
Table 4: Performance of continual learning methods under different learning orders on CLeaRS (long-horizon). Numbered markers denote learning sequences (see Appendix).
Table 7: Different learning orders in CLeaRS (long-horizon).
VLMs
AID
VRS-Cap
VRS-VG
VRS-VQA
SAR-VG
SAR-VQA
IR-VG
IR-VQA
FireRisk
RescueNet
Qwen2.5-VL [ 45 ]
63.3
0.3
40.8
62.5
36.6
44.9
53.4
47.7
14.5
43.3
MiniGPT-v2 [ 46 ]
24.5
2.4
0.3
40.5
0.8
32.8
0.1
27.0
14.8
29.3
LLaVA-1.5 [ 47 ]
48.0
1.5
1.9
57.3
1.0
39.8
0.2
38.1
16.1
38.1
GeoChat [ 3 ]
73.5
3.2
6.2
54.1
4.4
39.7
0.1
33.9
14.3
37.3
VHM w/o SFT [ 7 ]
34.6
0.0
0.2
46.9
0.2
49.5
0.0
25.5
14.3
23.6
Appendix
Table 8: Zero-Shot Performance of VLMs on the CLeaRS benchmark. VHM w/o SFT denotes the model without supervised fine-tuning. Bounding box coordinates in VRS-VG, SAR-VG, and IR-VG are converted to match the formats used by each model.
VLMs
VRS-VG
SAR-VG
IR-VG
VRS-VQA
SAR-VQA
IR-VQA
MFT
MFN
MAA
BWT
VHM
Inst.
5.7
12.7
12.6
72.1
91.9
56.0
41.8
24.2
15.7
-21.2
Final
0.7
1.2
0.3
44.3
42.5
56.0
VHM †
Inst.
8.7
33.6
37.3
72.7
92.4
58.8
50.6
26.3
19.1
-29.1
Final
0.1
0.0
0.0
32.1
66.8
58.8
Appendix
Table 9: Performance of VHM on CLeaRS (modality-incremental) with frozen vs. unfrozen vision encoder. † indicates an unfrozen vision encoder. Inst. reports performance immediately after each subset, while Final denotes performance after the last subset, both under sequential fine-tuning.
Remote sensing vision-language models are increasingly expected to support open-ended reasoning over Earth Observation data and a variety of tasks. Most recent progress in this area has been driven by remote-sensing-specific architectural designs, often introducing new encoders, alignment modules, or task-specific fusion mechanisms. In this work, we challenge the necessity of such architectural specialization. We show that a generally capable vision-language model can achieve competitive or state-of-the-art performance at challenging remote sensing benchmarks, provided that it is trained at sufficient scale across diverse data and tasks. Our model uses a single language policy that can either answer directly in text or invoke a localization tool for segmentation and grounding. To train this heterogeneous behaviour, we employ a multi-task reinforcement learning framework with adaptive task rewards covering multiple-choice VQA, free-form VQA, captioning, detection, and segmentation across a large variety of input types. Our approach achieves competitive results across a broad set of benchmarks, including high-resolution, multi-temporal, multi-modal and multi-view tasks. Further, as training data scales, our experiments show consistent improvements across most tasks both in and out of distribution, which correlate with per-task data diversity. These findings suggest that, for remote sensing VLMs, data scale is sufficient even without architectural novelty.
Stefan Maria Ailuro, Mario Markov, Mohammad Mahdi +2
Remote-sensing videos enable real-time observation of changes in target attributes, short-term activities, and scene evolution. They record motion, actions, interactions, and scene changes that cannot be captured by isolated images. Existing models primarily target single images or discrete temporal observations spanning a long time range. However, a unified evaluation setting for assessing vision-language models on continuous remote-sensing video understanding remains lacking. We introduce RSVideo-10K, a remote-sensing video dataset comprising 10,773 instances, 1.47 million frames, and 17.02 hours of footage, containing both unmanned aerial vehicles and satellite platforms. Its fixed evaluation benchmark, RSVideo-Bench, contains 2,731 test instances and evaluates two complementary aspects of remote-sensing video understanding: L1 Perception and L2 Reasoning, spanning seven capability groups and 17 tasks. Evaluations show that current vision-language models still struggle to recover small local evidence, track short-lived states, and use scene-constrained spatial relations. Based on this analysis, we further propose RSVideo, a reinforcement learning framework for small-target spatiotemporal focusing that selects question-relevant regions across frames and suppresses redundant background tokens. RSVideo achieves a maximum absolute improvement of 9.01% with InternVL3.5-14B and attains the highest accuracy of 40.63% with Qwen3.6-27B across 26 open-source vision-language backbones. Codes will be available at https://github.com/HongjieZhou0329/RSVideo.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated effective perception and reasoning capabilities on general-domain tasks, leading to growing interest in their application to Earth observation. However, a systematic benchmark for comprehensively evaluating remote sensing vision-language models (RSVLMs) remains lacking. To address this gap, we introduce OmniEarth, a benchmark for evaluating RSVLMs under realistic Earth observation scenarios. OmniEarth organizes tasks along three capability dimensions: perception, reasoning, and robustness. It defines 28 fine-grained tasks covering multi-source sensing data and diverse geospatial contexts. The benchmark supports two task formulations: multiple-choice VQA and open-ended VQA. The latter includes pure text outputs for captioning tasks, bounding box outputs for visual grounding tasks, and mask outputs for segmentation tasks. To reduce linguistic bias and examine whether model predictions rely on visual evidence, OmniEarth adopts a blind test protocol and a quintuple semantic consistency requirement. OmniEarth includes 9,275 carefully quality-controlled images, including proprietary satellite imagery from Jilin-1 (JL-1), along with 44,210 manually verified instructions. We conduct a systematic evaluation of contrastive learning-based models, general closed-source and open-source VLMs, as well as RSVLMs. Results show that existing VLMs still struggle with geospatially complex tasks, revealing clear gaps that need to be addressed for remote sensing applications. OmniEarth is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/sjeeudd/OmniEarth.
Ronghao Fu, Haoran Liu, Weijie Zhang +4
Jilin University, Changchun, China · Chang Guang Satellite Technology, Changchun, China