Organizations: X-LANCE Lab, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · SJTU Paris Elite Institute of Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · Shanghai Innovation Institute, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Contrastively pretrained audio-language models (e.g., CLAP) excel at clip-level understanding but struggle with frame-level tasks. Existing extensions fail to exploit the varying granularity of real-world audio-text data, where massive clip-level textual descriptions coexist with limited frame-level annotations. This paper proposes Fine-grained Language-Audio Pretraining (FineLAP), a novel training paradigm that advances both clip- and frame-level alignment in CLAP with heterogeneous data. FineLAP introduces a dual-stream sigmoid loss with a cluster-based sampling strategy to jointly learn from clip- and frame-level supervision. To capture both global semantics and local details, FineLAP uses a decoupled audio projector on top of a self-supervised encoder. To alleviate the scarcity of temporally annotated data, we present FineLAP-100k, a large-scale synthetic SED dataset constructed through a scalable curation pipeline. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FineLAP achieves SOTA performance across multiple audio understanding tasks, including retrieval, classification, sound event detection, and text-to-audio grounding. Ablation studies further show that coarse- and fine-grained alignment are mutually beneficial, providing insights for building better audio-language models (ALMs).
Figures & tables
Figure 1: FineLAP’s performance across different benchmark datasets: Our model achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on both clip- and frame-level tasks.
Figure 2: FineLAP effectively leverages the fine-grained alignment between audio frames and textual phrases to detect temporal boundaries of overlapping events.
Figure 3: Overview of FineLAP. Left: The decoupled adapter enables simultaneous clip- and frame-level understanding. Right: The framework synergizes global and dense alignment by leveraging heterogeneous supervision via a dual-stream sigmoid loss with cluster-based sampling.
Methods
Type
Data †
Supervision ‡
LAION-CLAP Wu et al. (2023)
CLAP
2.7M
Global
HTSAT-BERT Mei et al. (2024)
CLAP
0.5M
Global
Cacophony Zhu et al. (2024)
CLAP
4.1M
Global
M2D-CLAP Niizumi et al. (2025)
CLAP
2.6M
Global
MGA-CLAP Li et al. (2024b)
CLAP
0.5M
Global
FLAM Wu et al. (2025)
CLAP
2.2M
Global + Frame
Table 1: Overview of baseline models. † : Data denotes number of audio clips used for training. ‡ : Supervision indicates whether training relies on clip-level annotations (Global) or frame-level annotations (Frame).
Methods
AudioCaps Eval (%)
Clotho Eval (%)
T–A Retrieval
A–T Retrieval
T–A Retrieval
A–T Retrieval
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
LAION-CLAP Wu et al. (2023)
35.1
71.9
83.7
44.2
80.8
90.3
16.9
41.6
54.4
24.4
49.3
65.7
HTSAT-BERT Mei et al. (2024)
39.7
74.5
86.1
51.7
82.3
90.6
19.5
45.2
58.2
23.4
50.9
63.4
Cacophony Zhu et al. (2024)
41.0
75.3
86.4
55.3
83.6
92.4
20.2
45.9
58.8
26.5
54.1
67.3
MGA-CLAP Li et al. (2024b)
42.2
74.9
-
53.7
84.3
-
20.8
45.0
-
26.5
54.1
-
Table 2: Audio-text retrieval performance on the evaluation split of AudioCaps and Clotho.
Methods
DESED
AS-SL
USED
TAG
HTSAT-BERT Mei et al. (2024)
0.131
0.284
0.016
0.344
MGA-CLAP Li et al. (2024b)
0.264
0.354
0.087
0.487
FLAM Wu et al. (2025)
0.094
0.351
0.295
-
FlexSED Hai et al. (2025)
0.161
0.448
0.052
-
PE A-Frame Vyas et al. (2025)
0.344
0.431
0.123
-
PT-SED Schmid et al. (2025)
-
0.465
-
-
Table 3: Sound event detection performance on DESED, AudioSet-Strong (AS-SL), UrbanSED (USED) and AudioGrounding (TAG).
Methods
ESC-50
US8K
VGGSound
LAION-CLAP Wu et al. (2023)
91.0
77.0
29.1
HTSAT-BERT Mei et al. (2024)
94.8
80.6
29.6
Cacophony Zhu et al. (2024)
93.4
77.1
27.0
MGA-CLAP Li et al. (2024b)
94.9
83.7
31.8
FLAM Wu et al. (2025)
86.9
75.6
39.3
M2D-CLAP Niizumi et al. (2025)
94.3
82.3
-
Table 4: Audio classification performance on ESC-50, UrbanSound8K, and VGGSound.
Methods
Audio-Text Retrieval
Sound Event Detection
Audio Classification
AC-T2A ∗
AC-A2T ∗
DESED
AS-SL
UrbanSED
TAG
VGGSound
US8K
FineLAP (Ours)
45.7
62.5
0.344
0.474
0.446
0.649
31.5
84.9
w/o Frame-level Loss
44.4
58.3
0.021
0.191
0.000
0.303
31.4
82.7
w/o Clip-level Loss
4.9
6.2
0.322
0.451
0.462
0.480
11.3
58.6
w/o Decoupled Projector
44.8
55.4
0.317
0.467
0.442
0.448
31.8
85.4
w/o Synthetic Data
45.4
61.6
0.324
0.468
0.154
0.589
31.3
78.0
Table 5: Ablation studies on loss design, model architecture and synthetic data. ∗ : AC-T2A and AC-A2T denote the R@1 retrieval performance on the evaluation split of AudioCaps.
Methods
Fine-grained Projector
Audio-Text Retrieval
Sound Event Detection
Audio Classification
AC-T2A
AC-A2T
DESED
AS-SL
UrbanSED
TAG
VGGSound
US8K
FineLAP (Ours)
Transformer
45.7
62.5
0.344
0.474
0.446
0.649
31.5
84.9
BiGRU
45.8
61.7
0.329
0.471
0.432
0.589
31.1
84.5
Linear
46.3
61.1
0.329
0.463
0.435
0.570
31.5
83.0
Table 6: Ablation studies on the architecture of fine-grained audio adapter fa .
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Nphrases
DESED-PSDS ↑
10
0.163
15
0.175
20
0.182
25
0.184
30
0.181
Appendix
Table 7: Sensitivity analysis on the number of phrases N in the clustering-based negative sampling design.
Figure 4: Visualization of FineLAP’s performance on DESED-Eval
Figure 5: Visualization of FineLAP’s performance on AudioSet-Strong
Figure 6: Visualization of the proposed window-based audio clipping strategy
Audio-language pretraining (ALP) holds promise for learning general-purpose audio representation, yet remains underexplored. Crucially, there is no consensus on whether audio-language models can build effective general-purpose audio encoders, nor a systematic understanding of how pretraining objectives behave across diverse tasks and scales. We identify three key barriers: limited scale of audio-text corpora, limited coverage of audio attributes in existing caption corpora, and lack of systematic exploration and evaluation. To fill this gap, we present the first principled empirical study of ALP. We first introduce CaptionStew, a 10.7M caption dataset aggregating open-source audio-text corpora across multiple domains and captioning focuses. We then conduct the first comprehensive evaluation comparing contrastive and captioning objectives for learning audio representation across speech, music, and environmental sound tasks. Our results not only demonstrate that ALP yields competitive, transferable representations, but reveal critical trade-offs: contrastive learning offers superior data efficiency, while captioning exhibits better scalability. Furthermore, we find that the benefits of supervised initialization often diminish at larger scales, challenging common practices. By grounding these claims in empirical evidence, we establish a viable pathway toward general-purpose audio representation learning, guiding future research.
Wei-Cheng Tseng, Xuanru Zhou, Mingyue Huo +3
University of Texas at Austin · Tencent AI Lab Seattle · Zhejiang University +1
Conventional audio language models (ALMs) have made significant progress in achieving alignment between auditory and textual representations, including recent explorations in spatial audio. However, in daily spatial scenarios, they still cannot effectively process multi-event audio sequences. Current approaches primarily rely on coarse-grained contrastive learning with global auditory and textual features, lacking the resolution to distinguish multiple sequential events. To overcome these limitations, we propose CoSTALA-a novel training paradigm that transitions from purely global alignment to fine-grained spatio-temporal reasoning. By constructing a multi-granularity hierarchical loss function system, we achieve explicit modeling of temporal dependencies, and successfully anchors individual acoustic events to preserve their semantic purity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoSTALA significantly establish a powerful new framework for spatio-temporal audio understanding.
Peiwei Ren, Jinbo Hu, Fang Kang +2
Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, China · MiLM Plus, Xiaomi Inc., China · Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis, University of Oulu, Finland +1
Large Audio-Language Models (ALMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable capabilities in holistic audio understanding, yet they remain unreliable for temporal grounding, i.e., the task of pinpointing exactly when an event occurs within long-form audio. This limitation stems from two factors: training data dominated by clip-level supervision lacking precise timestamps, and benchmarks that fail to simulate real-world scenarios where short events are obscured by dense background sounds. In this paper, we introduce SpotSound, an audio language model designed for grounding audio events. SpotSound incorporates a novel training objective, specifically designed to suppress hallucinated timestamps for events absent from the input. Additionally, we present SpotSound-Bench, a challenging temporal grounding benchmark where target events occupy less than ~10% of each clip, creating a rigorous 'needle-in-a-haystack' evaluation. Experiments demonstrate that SpotSound achieves state-of-the-art results on temporal grounding benchmarks while maintaining robust performance across general downstream audio-language tasks. Code, models and benchmark are released on https://loiesun.github.io/spotsound/
Luoyi Sun, Xiao Zhou, Zeqian Li +3
Zhejiang University Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China · SAI, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, China