Organizations: Advanced Research Center on Electronic System (ARCES) · Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, Italy · TU Berlin, Robotics Institute Germany, Einstein Center Digital Future, SCIoI Excellence Cluster, Germany
We propose EventHub, a novel framework for training deep-event stereo networks without ground truth annotations from costly active sensors, relying instead on standard color images. From these images, we derive either proxy annotations and proxy events through state-of-the-art novel view synthesis techniques, or simply proxy annotations when images are already paired with event data. Using the training set generated by our data factory, we repurpose state-of-the-art stereo models from RGB literature to process event data, obtaining new event stereo models with unprecedented generalization capabilities. Experiments on widely used event stereo datasets support the effectiveness of EventHub and show how the same data distillation mechanism can improve the accuracy of RGB stereo foundation models in challenging conditions such as nighttime scenes.
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Limitations of LiDAR-supervised real-world datasets. Despite their popularity [ 18 , 7 , 84 ] , LiDAR annotations remain sparse (A), poorly capture dynamic scenes (B–C), are prone to reprojection errors (D), and struggle on transparent or reflective surfaces (E).
Figure 3: Framework Overview : We obtain training data through two complementary approaches: (i) Event Data Factory : SVRaster [ 59 ] generates synthetic event stereo pairs and depth labels from sparse RGB images via virtual camera trajectories (left); (ii) Stereo Cross-Modal Distillation : existing RGB stereo models produce proxy depth labels for real event data in calibrated RGB-Event stereo setups (top right). (iii) Both data sources are combined in EventHub to train/adapt event stereo networks (bottom right).
Figure 4: Qualitative examples of events and proxy annotations by EventHub. From top to bottom, examples obtained from NeRF-Stereo [ 63 ] , ScanNet++ [ 75 ] through novel view synthesis, and from DSEC [ 18 ] through cross-modal distillation.
Dataset
MIX 1
MIX 2
MIX 3
MIX 4
NeRF-Stereo [ 63 ]
✓
✓
✓
ScanNet++ [ 75 ]
✓
✓
DSEC [ 18 ]
✓
✓
Table 1: Combinations of datasets used by EventHub. Proxy labels are applied to annotate each dataset.
Training Method
SE-CFF [ 49 ]
EMatch [ 82 ]
E-FoundationStereo
E-StereoAnywhere
Avg Rank
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
(A)
Photometric [ 63 ]
88.54
71.73
55.35
7.94
92.31
69.17
44.90
3.37
93.85
73.12
49.82
3.65
92.55
72.25
51.65
4.11
6.94
(B)
EV-SceneFlow [ 17 , 45 ]
66.30
50.18
41.47
3.50
71.64
53.67
42.02
3.56
61.80
48.04
41.68
3.10
64.97
49.54
41.74
3.21
6.06
(C)
MIX 1
45.61
25.15
16.54
1.87
47.17
23.23
13.58
1.70
38.70
15.63
8.83
1.39
35.86
15.13
9.03
1.36
5.00
MIX 2
38.52
18.17
11.02
1.56
41.06
17.81
9.97
1.45
27.20
9.72
5.53
1.04
31.49
12.45
7.32
1.23
4.00
MIX 3
24.73
8.58
5.08
1.01
31.30
11.14
5.90
1.15
20.99
6.82
4.10
0.89
24.35
8.22
4.76
0.99
2.75
Table 2: In-domain experimental results – DSEC [ 18 ] dataset. We train four event stereo models according to different training protocols, not exploiting LiDAR annotations (A,B,C), compared against in-domain training on DSEC with LiDAR labels (D).
Figure 5: Qualitative results on DSEC dataset [ 18 ] . Predictions by E-FoundationStereo trained according to different protocols.
Model
Training Method
M3ED (Day)
M3ED (Night)
M3ED (Indoor)
Avg Rank
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
SE-CFF [ 49 ]
MIX 3
46.84
25.31
16.99
2.81
58.32
36.07
24.45
3.50
51.03
31.43
23.84
4.52
2.50
MIX 4
35.65
15.18
9.37
1.22
51.57
26.84
15.33
1.70
48.56
27.36
19.33
2.95
1.08
LiDAR (GT)
58.82
41.41
32.93
3.05
58.94
36.78
23.55
2.20
45.33
28.39
21.59
4.48
2.42
EMatch [ 82 ]
MIX 3
86.18
77.61
72.13
40.36
90.02
84.94
82.26
45.41
76.99
65.23
58.98
15.80
3.00
MIX 4
43.99
20.87
12.93
2.23
63.69
38.74
26.38
5.03
58.42
32.16
21.48
3.10
1.00
Table 3: Out-of-domain experimental results – M3ED [ 7 ] dataset. We compare the generalization capability of the four event stereo models trained with MIX 3 and MIX 4 against their counterparts trained using DSEC LiDAR labels.
Model
Training Method
MVSEC (Day)
MVSEC (Night)
MVSEC (Indoor)
Avg Rank
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
SE-CFF [ 49 ]
MIX 3
77.13
53.87
31.12
3.21
78.19
54.75
31.24
3.64
42.14
24.53
18.04
3.30
2.17
MIX 4
31.99
12.00
6.88
1.11
40.54
19.00
10.13
1.45
29.66
12.34
6.89
1.39
1.00
LiDAR (GT)
97.82
94.85
90.47
6.12
96.89
92.95
87.14
6.07
46.67
26.37
15.43
1.78
2.83
EMatch [ 82 ]
MIX 3
93.80
80.23
59.05
6.00
91.74
75.37
49.51
4.67
58.44
35.05
24.24
3.02
2.08
MIX 4
56.29
21.61
6.67
1.39
68.51
40.48
14.92
1.81
46.03
21.40
12.36
1.93
1.00
Table 4: Out-of-domain experimental results – MVSEC [ 84 ] dataset. We compare the generalization capability of the four event stereo models trained with MIX 3 and MIX 4 against their counterparts trained using DSEC LiDAR labels.
Figure 6: Qualitative results on M3ED [ 7 ] and MVSEC [ 84 ] . Predictions by the four models trained with LiDAR labels or MIX 4.
Model
Training Method
DSEC (Night)
1PE
2PE
3PE
MAE
FoundationStereo (ViT-S)
Author’s Weights [ 69 ]
68.40
47.69
35.80
3.89
MIX 3 (Night)
24.75
8.09
4.25
1.01
FoundationStereo (ViT-L)
Author’s Weights [ 69 ]
30.06
14.87
10.88
1.87
MIX 3 (Night)
25.33
8.48
4.56
1.06
StereoAnywhere (ViT-S)
Author’s Weights [ 6 ]
33.01
14.24
8.93
1.61
Table 5: Experimental results on DSEC night images [ 18 ] – RGB stereo models. Fine-tuning SFMs on proxy labels derived from our event models yields improvements on nighttime images.
Row
λN−mean
λN−med
λasc
λsparse
λDAv2
λMASt3R
PSNR
SSIM( ×100 )
MAE (cm)
δ≤1.25 (%)
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
33.85
87.36
8.81
93.51
2
0.001
0.001
-
-
-
-
33.25
86.77
9.03
92.43
3
0.001
0.001
0.01
-
-
-
33.25
86.77
9.03
92.47
4
0.001
0.001
0.01
0.01
-
-
33.25
86.77
8.99
92.52
5
0.001
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
-
33.19
86.73
6.61
96.23
6
0.001
0.001
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
26.86
79.64
38.71
67.31
Table 6: Depth regularization ablation. PSNR values are given in decibels. SSIM values are multiplied by a 100 factor. MAE values are reported in centimeters.
Model
PSNR ↑
MAE (cm) ↓
δ≤1.25 (%) ↑
Setup Time (min/scene) ↓
FPS ↑
Depth Anything v3 [ 40 ]
19.19
41.94
53.92
∼ 1
165
Instant-NGP [ 48 ]
29.21
24.68
82.88
∼ 8
5
3DGS [ 31 ]
32.51
22.36
76.23
∼ 20
165
SVRaster [ 59 ]
33.37
6.38
96.44
∼ 20
143
Table 7: Comparison between different NVS engines. SVRaster achieves the best trade-off between rendering quality, setup time and rendering speed.
Confidence
Threshold
MAE (cm)
δ≤1.25 (%)
Density (%)
-
-
6.38
96.44
100.00
CAO
0.35
6.26
96.60
95.45
CVsize
0.75
6.23
96.57
97.42
CAO
0.40
6.22
96.66
92.04
CVsize
0.80
6.15
96.61
95.56
CAO
0.45
6.20
96.72
87.38
Table 8: Confidence threshold study. Comparison between ambient occlusion confidence CAO [ 63 ] and our voxel-based confidence CVsize on ScanNet++ [ 75 ] . MAE values are reported in centimeters.
Training Method
SE-CFF
E-FoundationStereo
1PE ↓
2PE ↓
3PE ↓
MAE ↓
1PE ↓
2PE ↓
3PE ↓
MAE ↓
MIX 3 (SVRaster [ 59 ] )
24.73
8.58
5.08
1.01
20.99
6.82
4.10
0.89
MIX 3 (Depth Anything v3 [ 40 ] )
74.35
47.82
30.63
3.18
71.37
41.01
23.99
2.54
EV-SceneFlow [ 17 , 45 ]
66.30
50.18
41.47
3.50
61.80
48.04
41.68
3.10
EV-(SceneFlow+TartanAir) [ 17 , 45 , 65 ]
57.78
33.01
19.75
2.17
41.86
23.13
16.58
1.76
Table 9: Further in-domain experimental results – DSEC dataset [ 18 ] . On top: comparison between SVRaster and Depth Anything v3 generated data. At the bottom: results by extending the synthetic data used to generate proxy events.
Model
Parameters (M)
FLOPs (G)
Runtime (ms)
Peak Memory (MB)
SE-CFF [ 49 ]
2.97
85.98
46.27
379.13
EMatch [ 82 ]
6.71
501.95
115.20
3090.49
E-StereoAnywhere
39.96
1566.58
219.81
1479.82
E-FoundationStereo
60.09
4445.51
280.11
1525.13
Table 10: Hardware analysis on DSEC dataset [ 18 ] . Measurements taken on a X GPU.
Figure 7: Evaluation on DSEC after different numbers of training steps.
Figure 8: Global trajectory construction.
Figure 9: Qualitative examples of training data generated by EventHub on DSEC [ 18 ] . (a) left color image, (b) left event frame, (c) proxy disparity labels predicted by FoundationStereo [ 69 ] and projected on the event frame.
Figure 10: Qualitative examples of training data generated by EventHub on NeRFStereo [ 63 ] . (a) rendered color image, (b) rendered event frame, (c) rendered depth and (d) confidence (the brighter, the higher the confidence in the estimated depth values), and (e) rendered depth masked according to confidence thresholding.
Figure 11: Qualitative examples of training data generated by EventHub on ScanNet++ [ 75 ] . (a) rendered color image, (b) rendered event frame, (c) rendered depth and (d) confidence, (e) rendered depth masked according to confidence thresholding.
Figure 12: Qualitative results on DSEC [ 18 ] dataset. Predictions by the four models trained with LiDAR labels, MIX 3 or MIX 4.
Figure 13: Qualitative results on M3ED [ 7 ] dataset. Predictions by the four models trained with LiDAR labels, MIX 3 or MIX 4.
Figure 14: Qualitative results on MVSEC [ 84 ] dataset. Predictions by the four models trained with LiDAR labels, MIX 3 or MIX 4.
Figure 15: Improved RGB FoundationStereo at Night. Qualitative comparison on the zurich_city_09_d night sequence. (a) left RGB, (b) prediction by baseline FoundationStereo VIT-L, and (c) its fine-tuned counterpart using proxy labels from E-FoundationStereo VIT-S.
Figure 16: Improved RGB FoundationStereo at Night. Qualitative comparison on the zurich_city_10_b night sequence. (a) left RGB, (b) prediction by baseline FoundationStereo VIT-S, and (c) its fine-tuned counterpart using proxy labels from E-FoundationStereo VIT-S.
Conventional frame-based imaging for active stereo systems has encountered major challenges in fast-motion scenarios. However, how to design a novel paradigm for ultrafast depth sensing remains an open issue. In this paper, we propose a novel problem setting, namely active event-based stereo vision, which attempts to integrate binocular event cameras and an infrared 2D pattern projector for high-speed dense depth sensing. Technically, we first build a stereo camera prototype system and present a real-world dataset with over 21.5k spatiotemporal synchronized labels at 15 Hz, while also establishing a realistic synthetic dataset with stereo event streams and 23.8k synchronized labels at 20 Hz. Then, we propose ActiveEventNet+, a lightweight yet effective event-based stereo matching neural network that learns to generate high-quality dense disparity maps from stereo event streams with low latency. Our ActiveEventNet+ mainly involves three innovations: incorporating lightweight blocks into event-based stereo matching frameworks, designing a novel cost volume with dynamic interactions between stereo pairs, and presenting an effective temporal consistency architecture to fully use rich temporal cues in event streams. The results show that our ActiveEventNet+ outperforms state-of-the-art methods while significantly reducing computational complexity. Our solution offers superior depth sensing performance compared to conventional frame-based stereo cameras in high-speed scenes. In particular, the lightweight ActiveEventNet enables the prototype system to achieve real-time processing at speeds up to 150 FPS. We believe that this novel active event-based stereo vision paradigm can provide new insights into the design of future high-speed depth sensing camera systems. Our dataset and code can be available at https://github.com/jianing-li/active_event_based_stereo.
Jianing Li, Yunjian Zhang, Haiqian Han +2
Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China
Event cameras provide several unique advantages over standard frame-based sensors, including high temporal resolution, low latency, and robustness to extreme lighting. However, existing learning-based approaches for event processing are typically confined to narrow, task-specific silos and lack the ability to generalize across modalities. We address this gap with REALM, a cross-modal framework that learns an RGB- and Event-Aligned Latent Manifold by projecting event representations into the pretrained latent space of RGB foundation models. Instead of task-specific training, we leverage low-rank adaptation (LoRA) to bridge the modality gap, effectively unlocking the geometric and semantic priors of frozen RGB backbones for asynchronous event streams. We demonstrate that REALM effectively maps events into the ViT-based foundation latent space. Our method performs downstream tasks, such as depth estimation and semantic segmentation, by simply transferring linear heads trained on the RGB teacher. Most significantly, REALM enables the direct, zero-shot application of complex, frozen image-trained decoders, such as MASt3R, to raw event data. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance in wide-baseline feature matching, significantly outperforming specialized architectures. Code and models are available at https://papers.starslab.ca/realm/.
Vincenzo Polizzi, David B. Lindell, Jonathan Kelly
University of Toronto, Robotics Institute · University of Toronto, Department of Computer Science
Event cameras offer superior sensitivity to high-speed motion and extreme lighting, making event-based monocular depth estimation a promising approach for robust 3D perception in challenging conditions. However, progress is severely hindered by the scarcity of dense depth annotations. While recent annotation-free approaches mitigate this by distilling knowledge from Vision Foundation Models (VFMs), a critical limitation persists: they process event streams as independent frames. By neglecting the inherent temporal continuity of event data, these methods fail to leverage the rich temporal priors encoded in VFMs, ultimately yielding temporally inconsistent and less accurate depth predictions. To address this, we introduce EventVGGT, a novel framework that explicitly models the event stream as a coherent video sequence. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to distill spatio-temporal and multi-view geometric priors from the Visual Geometry Grounded Transformer (VGGT) into the event domain. We achieve this via a comprehensive tri-level distillation strategy: (i) Cross-Modal Feature Mixture (CMFM) bridges the modality gap at the output level by fusing RGB and event features to generate auxiliary depth predictions; (ii) Spatio-Temporal Feature Distillation (STFD) distills VGGT's powerful spatio-temporal representations at the feature level; and (iii) Temporal Consistency Distillation (TCD) enforces cross-frame coherence at the temporal level by aligning inter-frame depth changes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EventVGGT consistently outperforms existing methods -- reducing the absolute mean depth error at 30m by over 53% on EventScape (from 2.30 to 1.06) -- while exhibiting robust zero-shot generalization on the unseen DENSE and MVSEC datasets. The code is available at https://github.com/yinruiRen/EventVGGT.
Yinrui Ren, Jinjing Zhu, Kanghao Chen +8
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · South China Normal University · Chinese University of Hong Kong