Beyond Fixed Inference: Quantitative Flow Matching for Adaptive Image Denoising
Organizations: School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China · National Center for Applied Mathematics Beijing, Capital Normal University and Academy for multidisciplinary studies, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China · Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract
Diffusion and flow-based generative models have shown strong potential for image restoration. However, image denoising under unknown and varying noise conditions remains challenging, because the learned vector fields may become inconsistent across different noise levels, leading to degraded restoration quality under mismatch between training and inference. To address this issue, we propose a quantitative flow matching framework for adaptive image denoising. The method first estimates the input noise level from local pixel statistics, and then uses this quantitative estimate to adapt the inference trajectory, including the starting point, the number of integration steps, and the step-size schedule. In this way, the denoising process is better aligned with the actual corruption level of each input, reducing unnecessary computation for lightly corrupted images while providing sufficient refinement for heavily degraded ones. By coupling quantitative noise estimation with noise-adaptive flow inference, the proposed method improves both restoration accuracy and inference efficiency. Extensive experiments on natural, medical, and microscopy images demonstrate its robustness and strong generalization across diverse noise levels and imaging conditions.
Figures & tables
| Method | Venue | Overall splits | Test subsets by noise level | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train | Validation | Test | Medium noise | High noise | Very high noise | ||||||||
| PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | ||
| Noisy input | – | 7.7660 | 0.0847 | 7.5475 | 0.0895 | 6.8602 | 0.0738 | 22.7474 | 0.5974 | 16.6710 | 0.3773 | 5.0450 | 0.0158 |
| DVT | ECCV 2024 | 21.1297 | 0.5491 | 21.2101 | 0.5483 | 20.9563 | 0.5419 | 24.6206 | 0.7986 | 23.7915 | 0.7523 | 20.4850 | 0.5078 |
| MASH | CVPR 2024 | 20.1750 | 0.5025 | 20.2312 | 0.5149 | 19.9320 | 0.5279 | 25.7219 | 0.8232 | 24.7795 | 0.7642 | 19.1535 | 0.4892 |
| DeltaFM | ICCV 2025 | 15.1461 | 0.2522 | 15.2940 | 0.2547 | 14.5999 | 0.2296 | 26.8789 | 0.8573 | 27.2161 | 0.8193 | 12.7341 | 0.1393 |
| Method | Venue | Raw | Avg2 | Avg4 | Avg8 | Avg16 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | PSNR | SSIM | ||
| Noisy Image | – | 27.9524 | 0.5735 | 30.8260 | 0.7003 | 33.6758 | 0.8114 | 36.6080 | 0.8947 | 40.1838 | 0.9501 |
| TransUNet | MIA 2024 | 34.7428 | 0.8983 | 35.5516 | 0.9123 | 36.0403 | 0.9192 | 36.4022 | 0.9228 | 36.8469 | 0.9249 |
| MOTFM | MICCAI 2025 | 31.9868 | 0.7528 | 34.7947 | 0.8546 | 37.1023 | 0.9160 | 39.0293 | 0.9489 | 41.0715 | 0.9661 |
| FlowSDF | IJCV 2025 | 31.9759 | 0.7788 | 33.4901 | 0.8529 | 34.1086 | 0.8835 | 34.3907 | 0.8973 | 34.6921 | 0.9054 |
| QFM | Ours | 35.0272 | 0.9040 | 36.5377 | 0.9264 | 38.0481 | 0.9444 | 39.6858 | 0.9595 | 41.9457 | 0.9721 |
| Anatomical Region | Number of Images | Metric | Noisy Image | TransUNet | MOTFM | FlowSDF | QFM (Ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest | 1047 | PSNR | 28.7306 | 42.7329 | 40.7846 | 42.9543 | 44.2525 |
| SSIM | 0.4577 | 0.9505 | 0.9416 | 0.9477 | 0.9649 | ||
| Abdomen | 1205 | PSNR | 27.7540 | 41.8156 | 39.1901 | 42.8373 | 44.0748 |
| SSIM | 0.4428 | 0.9476 | 0.9402 | 0.9493 | 0.9591 |
Image Denoising
Image denoising removes unwanted noise while preserving the edges, textures, and colors needed for faithful images.
See all 157 papers