PolyReal: A Benchmark for Real-World Polymer Science Workflows

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in scientific discovery, yet it remains unclear whether they can support complex real laboratory science. Here we introduce Science Edge Evaluation (SEE), a multimodal benchmark of expert-curated questions grounded in peer-reviewed literature and experimental practice in chemistry, biology, and materials science. Evaluation of 19 multimodal large language models (MLLMs) shows that even the best-performing model reaches only 48.7% accuracy. Moreover, general-purpose models outperform science-specialized models on average. In the visual-agent evaluation, the use of tools increases the best accuracy to 52.7%. Tool use can expand the information available to models, but more information does not necessarily lead to reliable scientific reasoning. The key challenge is whether models can manage tool-derived information within the boundaries of the original experimental evidence. Together, these findings reveal that current MLLMs still cannot reliably make justified and evidence-bounded inferences from experimental results, which is an essential capability in real scientific discovery. Bridging this gap requires MLLMs to transition from explaining established scientific concepts to deriving novel and evidence-based insights from experimental data.

Can large language models predict physical and mechanical polymer properties simply by reading unstructured scientific prose? Polymer performance is rarely determined by chemical structure alone; identical nominal polymers can exhibit drastically different behaviors depending on their synthesis route, processing history, morphology, and testing conditions. Yet, state-of-the-art polymer property models typically rely on structure-only representations -- such as SMILES or molecular graphs -- which strip away this vital experimental context. In this work, we introduce PolyLM, a natural-language-only, process- and condition-aware framework that predicts materials performance directly from full-text literature. By circumventing structural inputs entirely, PolyLM preserves the nuanced, unstructured descriptions of synthesis and processing reported by domain scientists. To train this framework, we curated an unprecedented, literature-scale dataset encompassing 185,000 scientific papers and over 276,400 unique polymer samples across 22 physical, mechanical, and thermal properties. We fine-tuned a massive 9-billion-parameter language model (Qwen3.5-9B) using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and task-level uncertainty weighting. Evaluated on 68,283 held-out observations, the model achieves remarkably high predictive accuracy, establishing new state-of-the-art benchmarks for complex properties. Across the 22 diverse targets, the model achieves a median $R^2$ of 0.74, with predictions for key thermal, mechanical, and physicochemical properties frequently surpassing an $R^2$ of 0.80. These results unequivocally demonstrate that natural language is a powerful, highly scalable interface for realistic materials performance prediction.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet existing evaluations often fail to reflect the fine-grained capabilities required in practice. Most benchmarks are manually curated or domain-generic, limiting scalability and alignment with real scientific use cases. In this paper, we propose a new framework named SciCustom to address the problem. It enables the custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific scientific capabilities in LLMs. SciCustom first organizes scientific knowledge into ontology-grounded knowledge units with controlled granularity and trains a tagger to map large-scale data instances into this knowledge space. Given a custom requirement, relevant knowledge units are identified via voting-based multi-model consensus. These units enable relevance-aware benchmark retrieval via binary search, followed by proxy subset selection and data-grounded benchmark generation for efficient evaluation. Experiments in chemistry and healthcare demonstrate that SciCustom reveals fine-grained differences in LLM scientific capabilities that standard benchmarks overlook, while requiring neither expert annotation nor synthetic question generation. This work provides a scalable and application-aware foundation for benchmarking scientific capabilities in LLMs. The source code is available at https://github.com/yjwtheonly/SciCustom.