math.AGApr 3, 2026

A penalised Saito functional for heuristic search of free line arrangements

Authors: Tomás S. R. Silva

Organizations: Instituto de Matem´atica, Estat´ıstica e Computa¸c˜ao Cient´ıfica (IMECC), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-859, Campinas, S˜ao Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

We introduce the penalised Saito functional Sλ,β(A;d1,d2)\mathfrak S_{λ,β}(\mathcal{A};d_1,d_2) for a reduced arrangement A\mathcal{A} of nn lines and a prescribed pair d1+d2=n−1d_1+d_2=n-1. It measures the alignment of a candidate Saito determinant with the defining polynomial while penalising the failure of the candidate derivations to be logarithmic. We prove that the functional takes values in [0,1][0,1], vanishes exactly when A\mathcal{A} is free with exponents (1,d1,d2)(1,d_1,d_2), and lies strictly between 00 and 11 otherwise. For fixed (d1,d2)(d_1,d_2), it is upper semicontinuous on the reduced configuration space, continuous at arrangements free with the prescribed pair, and converges as λ→∞λ\to\infty to the corresponding binary freeness test. We use a numerical approximation of this functional, together with a small b2b_2-shell term, to guide fixed-cardinality line-replacement searches over Q\mathbb{Q} and selected quadratic extensions. Numerical values are used only to select candidates; every reported arrangement is certified in exact arithmetic using Saito's criterion. At the current snapshot, the certified database contains 6,1466{,}146 representatives with distinct Weisfeiler--Leman fingerprints and cardinalities up to n=28n=28. Among them, 3,0123{,}012 have multiplicity gap ε(A)=d1−m(A)≥2ε(\mathcal{A})=d_1-m(\mathcal{A})\geq2, including lower-bound-extremal examples with ε=7ε=7. These non-supersolvable arrangements provide test cases for studying realisation spaces and the persistence of freeness among realisations of the same intersection lattice, in connection with Terao's conjecture.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Mapping Uncharted Symmetries: Machine Discovery in Combinatorics

    May 18, 2026Eugenio Cainelli, Lorenzo Luccioli, Alessandro Iraci +2CombinationsSymmetry

  2. Big data approach to Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials

    Dec 2, 2024Abel Lacabanne, Daniel Tubbenhauer, Pedro VazPolynomialsSymmetry