STEAR: Layer-Aware Spatiotemporal Evidence Intervention for Hallucination Mitigation in Video Large Language Models
Authors: Linfeng Fan, Yuan Tian, Ziwei Li, Zhiwu Lu
Organizations: Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) remain prone to spatiotemporal hallucinations, often generating visually unsupported details or incorrect temporal relations. Existing mitigation methods typically treat hallucination as a uniform decoding failure, applying globally shared correction rules. We instead observe that decoder layers contribute differently to visual grounding and later linguistic composition, indicating that intervention must be layer-aware. Based on this insight, we propose STEAR, a layer-aware spatiotemporal evidence intervention framework. STEAR identifies high-risk decoding steps and selects token-conditioned visual evidence from grounding-sensitive middle layers. It uses this shared evidence for two coupled purposes: restoring missing local grounding in middle layers, and constructing temporally perturbed patch-level counterfactuals to falsify inconsistent reasoning during late-layer decoding. Consequently, STEAR mitigates both spatial and temporal hallucinations within an efficient single-encode inference framework. Experiments across representative Video-LLM backbones and challenging benchmarks demonstrate that STEAR consistently reduces hallucinations while improving faithfulness, temporal consistency, and robustness. Our results confirm that reliable video decoding relies on intervening on precise evidence at the right layer, rather than enforcing a global penalty. The code is provided in the Supplementary Material.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Given a single video encoding, STEAR first diagnoses risky decoding steps via token uncertainty, then selects token-conditioned key evidence shared by both middle-layer reinjection and deep-layer counterfactual decoding. This unified design addresses spatial hallucination by restoring missing grounding and suppresses temporal hallucination by falsifying temporally corrupted key evidence. dsp1
Figure 2. (a) Grounding score peaks in the middle decoder layers, while language dominance drops in the middle and rises again in the late layers, indicating a transition from evidence consolidation to language-dominant decoding. This suggests that hallucinations arise when token-relevant visual evidence is not sufficiently grounded before the model enters the late reasoning regime. (b) Middle-layer reinjection yields the largest gain, whereas others are ineffective. dsp2
Figure 3. For each risky token, KES aggregates middle-layer cross-attention to identify the top- k key patches that best support the current prediction. The selected evidence is then reinjected into grounding-sensitive middle layers, restoring token-required but potentially neglected visual support without disturbing stable decoding steps. dsp2
Backbone
Method
EventHallusion ↑
VidHalluc ↑
NExT-QA ↑
MVBench ↑
Avg. ↑
LLaVA-Video-7B
Baseline
46.70 ± 0.00
63.07 ± 0.00
58.43 ± 0.00
41.28 ± 0.00
52.37 ± 0.00
+VCD
40.17 ↓ 6.53
65.48 ↑ 2.41
60.27 ↑ 1.84
38.92 ↓ 2.36
51.21 ↓ 1.16
+MemVR
47.10 ↑ 0.40
65.69 ↑ 2.62
60.47 ↑ 2.04
41.25 ↓ 0.03
53.63 ↑ 1.26
+TCD
51.62 ↑ 4.92
64.39 ↑ 1.32
60.27 ↑ 1.84
37.47 ↓ 3.81
53.44 ↑ 1.07
+DINO-HEAL
46.70 ± 0.00
65.58 ↑ 2.51
60.27 ↑ 1.84
40.94 ↓ 0.34
53.37 ↑ 1.00
+ STEAR (Ours)
54.77 ↑ 8.07
65.81 ↑ 2.74
61.88 ↑ 3.45
41.74 ↑ 0.46
56.05 ↑ 3.68
Table 1. Cross-backbone overall comparison. All numbers are accuracies (%). Avg. denotes the arithmetic mean over the four reported overall metrics under the same backbone. For each non-baseline method, the inline delta shows the absolute change relative to the corresponding baseline of the same backbone. Best and second-best results within each backbone are highlighted in bold and underline, respectively.
Method
EventHallusion ↑
NExT-QA ↑
MVBench ↑
Entire
Misleading
Mix
Overall
C
T
D
Acc.
Loc.
Pred.
Seq.
Obj.
Overall
Baseline
29.82
43.13
58.55
46.70
57.32
53.44
72.53
58.43
29.33
36.60
55.12
41.60
41.28
+MemVR
30.70
42.15
59.06
47.10
59.65
55.33
73.87
60.47
28.83
36.80
55.12
41.30
41.25
+VCD
28.90
43.10
45.10
40.10
59.38
55.33
73.49
60.27
29.17
33.10
52.00
39.60
38.92
+TCD
47.36
43.13
58.54
51.62
59.61
55.02
73.36
60.27
27.33
33.60
47.00
39.20
37.47
+DINO-HEAL
28.90
43.10
59.10
46.70
59.49
55.09
73.62
60.27
29.33
35.70
54.75
41.30
40.94
Table 2. Fine-grained breakdown on LLaVA-Video-7B. STEAR is particularly strong on misleading event cases and consistently improves all NExT-QA and MVBench sub-groups. Best results are in bold and second-best results are underlined.
Method
Enc.
Rel. Latency ↓
Rel. Memory ↓
EH Overall ↑
VCD
2
2.42 ×
1.13 ×
40.17
TCD
2
2.25 ×
1.13 ×
51.62
STEAR (Ours)
1
1.89 ×
1.01 ×
54.77
Table 3. Efficiency comparison on LLaVA-Video-7B. “Enc.” denotes the number of visual encoding passes, and “EH” refers to EventHallusion. STEAR preserves a single-encode design while achieving the strongest hallucination mitigation performance.
Variant
EventHallusion Overall ↑
VidHalluc (ACH-BQA) ↑
Baseline
47.43 ± 0.00
41.02 ± 0.00
STEAR (full)
54.77 ↑ 7.34
44.14 ↑ 3.12
Core components
w/o uncertainty trigger (apply to all tokens)
48.41 ↑ 0.98
41.91 ↑ 0.89
w/o middle-layer reinjection
50.61 ↑ 3.18
43.50 ↑ 2.48
w/o temporal counterfactual decoding
47.92 ↑ 0.49
41.37 ↑ 0.35
Table 4. Core ablations on LLaVA-Video-7B for validating the mechanism of STEAR. The table is organized to test three claims: selective intervention via uncertainty triggering, grounding repair in middle layers, and evidence-level temporal falsification through local counterfactuals. Inline deltas show absolute changes relative to the baseline.
Figure 4. Compared with Video-LLMs, STEAR better grounds local evidence and suppresses temporally inconsistent generations. dsp5
Recent Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) have demonstrated strong capability in video understanding, yet they still suffer from hallucinations. Existing mitigation methods typically rely on training, input modification, auxiliary guidance, or additional decoding procedures, while largely overlooking a more fundamental challenge. During generation, Video-LLMs tend to over-rely on a limited portion of temporal evidence, leading to temporally imbalanced evidence aggregation across the video. To address this issue, we investigate a decoder-side phenomenon in which the model exhibits a temporally imbalanced concentration pattern. We term the frame with the highest aggregated frame-level attention mass the anchor frame. We find that this bias is largely independent of the input video and instead appears to reflect a persistent, model-specific structural or positional bias, whose over-dominance is closely associated with hallucination-prone generation. Motivated by this insight, we propose Decoder-side Temporal Rebalancing (DTR), a training-free, layer-selective inference method that rebalances temporal evidence allocation in middle-to-late decoder layers without altering visual encoding or requiring auxiliary models. DTR adaptively calibrates decoder-side visual attention to alleviate temporally imbalanced concentration and encourage under-attended frames to contribute more effectively to response generation. In this way, DTR guides the decoder to ground its outputs in temporally broader and more balanced video evidence. Extensive experiments on hallucination and video understanding benchmarks show that DTR consistently improves hallucination robustness across diverse Video-LLM families, while preserving competitive video understanding performance and high inference efficiency.
Zijian Liu, Sihan Cao, Pengcheng Zheng +5
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences · Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen +1
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in open-ended video understanding, yet they remain prone to fluent responses unsupported by video evidence. Existing training-free methods typically apply a globally fixed visual intervention or construct a contrastive branch through input perturbation. The former cannot accommodate video-dependent fusion paths, while the latter can be compensated by cross-frame redundancy. We therefore propose Video-Adaptive Debiasing via Evidence Reweighting (VADER), a training-free framework with two complementary modules. Visual Focus Reallocation (VFR) automatically instantiates an intervention policy for each video-question input: it diagnoses layer-wise visual-to-text evidence flow, determines where to intervene, and derives how strongly to reallocate pre-softmax attention from system-token to video-token blocks. Selective Evidence Erasure (SEE) independently masks high-importance visual tokens in every frame, constructing a prior-biased branch that is difficult to compensate through neighboring frames. Contrastive decoding then down-weights predictions that remain confident after selective evidence erasure. Across multiple VideoLLMs, VADER yields substantial improvements on event-level grounding and temporal consistency; on LLaVA-Video-7B, it reaches 72.60% accuracy on EventHallusion.
Dong Xing, Jiaxin Chen, Hang Yang +3
Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun, Jilin 130033, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China · City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Video large language models (Video LLMs) often generate responses unsupported by the input video. Contrastive decoding (CD) can mitigate these hallucinations, but its effectiveness depends on how the negative branch weakens visual evidence. Existing methods rely on predefined perturbations or masking guided by question reconstruction, offering limited control over the model's visual reliance during answer generation. We introduce Attention-guided Representation Perturbation for Contrastive Decoding (ARP-CD), a training-free framework for constructing contrastive negatives directly in representation space. ARP-CD uses the attention mass assigned to visual tokens at the answer-prediction position to guide bounded gradient updates of the language model's input visual hidden states. These updates reduce visual attention and produce a negative input, whose predictions are contrasted with those of the original branch throughout generation. Experiments across four Video LLMs and four benchmarks show that ARP-CD outperforms representative training-free baselines in most model--benchmark settings, reducing hallucinations while improving general video understanding. Further analyses show that attention-guided perturbation directions improve negative quality and that the resulting negatives provide effective contrastive references for correcting the original predictions.
Zhixin Cai, Ruoqi Yuan, Xinchen Yang +4
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University · Beijing Institute for General Artificial Intelligence, BIGAI · Sino-French Engineer School, Beihang University