Organizations: Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a popular training paradigm in the LLM community. This paradigm selects a larger model as the teacher to provide dense, fine-grained signals for each sampled trajectory, in contrast to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which only obtains sparse signals from verifiable outcomes in the environment. Recently, the community has explored on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where the same model serves as both teacher and student, with the teacher receiving additional privileged information such as reference answers to enable self-evolution. This paper demonstrates that learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training. Accordingly, we identify the optimal niche for self-distillation and propose RLSD (RLVR with Self-Distillation). Specifically, we leverage self-distillation to obtain token-level policy differences for determining fine-grained update magnitudes, while continuing to use RLVR to derive reliable update directions from environmental feedback (e.g., response correctness). This enables RLSD to simultaneously harness the strengths of both RLVR and OPSD, achieving a higher convergence ceiling and superior training stability.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Performance on the trained Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct model. In (a), OPSD reaches its peak performance early and degrades, whereas RLSD inherits the training stability of GRPO while achieving a higher convergence ceiling. In (b), GRPO and RLSD report results at 200 training steps, while GRPO (2 × steps) reports results at 400 steps; RLSD at 200 steps already surpasses GRPO trained for twice as many steps, demonstrating faster convergence.
Method
Trajectory
Efficiency
Leakage Risk
Signal
Direction Anchoring
SFT
✗ Off-policy
✓ High
✓ N/A
✓ Rich
✗ Teacher
RLVR (GRPO)
✓ On-policy
✓ High
✓ N/A
✗ Weak
✓ Environment
OPD
✓ On-policy
✗ Low
✓ N/A
✓ Rich
✗ Teacher
OPSD
✓ On-policy
✓ High
✗ Severe
✓ Rich
✗ Teacher
RLSD (Ours)
✓ On-policy
✓ High
✓ N/A
✓ Rich
✓ Environment
Table 1: Comparison of training paradigms for post-training LLMs.
Figure 2: A representative example illustrating the privileged information leakage exhibited by the OPSD-trained model, where the model appeals to an invisible reference solution during inference.
Figure 3: Leakage, KL divergence, and validation performance of OPSD and its ablated variants.
Figure 4: An overview of our RLSD method.
Method
MMMU
MathVista
MathVision
ZeroBench
Wemath
Avg.
Base LLM
62.44
73.80
47.37
19.76
54.10
51.49
GRPO
65.11
76.20
48.82
22.60
56.57
53.86
OPSD
63.82
75.10
47.53
21.06
54.95
52.49
SDPO
65.11
74.00
47.27
25.15
52.19
52.74
GRPO+OPSD
63.22
75.90
48.52
22.16
54.76
52.91
RLSD (Ours)
67.22
78.10
52.73
24.85
58.00
56.18
Table 2: Multimodal reasoning results on the Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct model. Bold indicates the best result among all models. Avg. is computed over the five selected benchmarks.
Figure 5: Training dynamics on the multimodel reasoning tasks.
Figure 6: Token-level credit heatmaps under RLSD for two multimodal reasoning examples. Top: in a correct trajectory, larger credit is concentrated on the decisive counting and subtraction steps. Bottom: in an incorrect trajectory, the strongest blame is assigned to the misread bar-model relation and the derived wrong answer. Green denotes larger token-level credit magnitude and red denotes smaller token-level credit magnitude.
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Property
OPSD (Frozen Teacher)
OPSD (Online Teacher)
RLSD
(a) Objective stability
✓
×
✓
(b) Sustained improvement
×
✓
✓
(c) Leakage-free training
×
×
✓
Appendix
Table 3: Comparison of OPSD parameter management strategies and RLSD across the three desiderata identified in the impossibility trilemma.
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a popular training paradigm for LLMs, providing dense, token-level supervision by aligning a model's own distribution with the distribution induced by privileged information. However, existing OPSD methods derive supervision solely from privileged information of the same instance, leaving inter-instance supervision largely unexplored. We propose Lookahead Self-Distillation (LEAD), which introduces inter-instance distillation by allowing the teacher to first learn from other on-policy rollouts before teaching the student. LEAD constructs lookahead teachers through virtual RL updates on disjoint subsets of on-policy rollouts, and uses each teacher to provide cross-group token-level supervision for the other subset. To reconcile the complementary yet potentially conflicting signals from OPSD and RLVR, we introduce harmonious modulation, which adaptively modulates the GRPO advantage based on the agreement between the two signals. Extensive experiments on scientific reasoning and interactive-agent benchmarks show that LEAD achieves the best in-domain average performance across model scales while maintaining out-of-domain generalization comparable to GRPO.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for improving large language models (LLMs) on various tasks, yet its sparse outcome rewards lack token-level credit assignment for intermediate steps. To address this, on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) leverages a self-teacher with privileged context to provide additional dense learning signals. However, because the self-teacher is often overconfident and imposes excessive penalties on long reasoning trajectories, OPSD frequently struggles in practice. To mitigate this, we propose self-instructing policy optimization (SIPO) with a contrastive self-teacher to provide dense credit. At each iteration, SIPO samples multiple rollouts per prompt from the current policy, scores them with environment rewards, and constructs two teacher contexts for each rollout by pairing the reference answer with mistakes made within the group. The model then re-evaluates its own responses under both contexts, using the difference between the two teacher log-probabilities as token-level feedback, so that biases shared by both contexts are expected to largely cancel. The resulting objective yields a token-level advantage for every rollout: the reward still sets the main direction of each update while the self-teacher redistributes credit across tokens. Even in groups where every rollout fails and group-relative advantages vanish, SIPO still provides a learning signal. By preserving direct optimization of the task reward while providing dense, token-level feedback, this approach bridges reinforcement learning and on-policy self-distillation. Extensive experiments across multiple reasoning and code-generation benchmarks demonstrate that SIPO outperforms both RLVR and OPSD baselines without an external teacher or additional generation.
Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Yueqi Wang +8
University of Illinois · UC San Diego · Rochester Institute of Technology +2
On-policy distillation (OPD) provides dense, per-token supervision for language model post-training, but its effectiveness is bottlenecked by teacher quality: external teachers suffer from distribution mismatch, while self-distillation with privileged conditioning is limited by in-context learning capacity. We propose RISE (Recursive Improvement via Self-Extrapolating Policy Distillation), which constructs a synthetic teacher directly from the model's own RLVR training trajectory. By extrapolating the displacement between the current checkpoint and a trailing anchor---in parameter space or output logit space---RISE converts a sparse outcome-induced parameter update into a dense token-level target, without any external model or privileged conditioning. RISE combines RLVR and OPD in a complementary loop: outcome rewards ground the extrapolation toward correct reasoning, while the extrapolated teacher refines token-level decisions. Moreover, since the teacher is refreshed every iteration as the student improves, distillation becomes a recursive improvement mechanism rather than a one-shot compression step. Experiments spanning mathematical reasoning, multi-domain STEM, code generation, and multi-turn agentic tasks show that RISE outperforms RLVR-only training and on-policy self-distillation across all settings.