cs.CVApr 3, 2026

Learning Additively Compositional Latent Actions for Embodied AI

Authors: Hangxing Wei, Xiaoyu Chen, Chuheng Zhang, Tim Pearce, Jianyu Chen, Alex Lamb, Li Zhao, Jiang Bian

Organizations: Wuhan University · Tsinghua University · Microsoft Research

Abstract

Latent action learning infers pseudo-action labels from visual transitions, providing an approach to leverage internet-scale video for embodied AI. However, most methods learn latent actions without structural priors that encode the additive, compositional structure of physical motion. As a result, latents often entangle irrelevant scene details or information about future observations with true state changes and miscalibrate motion magnitude. We introduce Additively Compositional Latent Action Model (AC-LAM), which enforces scene-wise additive composition structure over short horizons on the latent action space. These AC constraints encourage simple algebraic structure in the latent action space~(identity, inverse, cycle consistency) and suppress information that does not compose additively. Empirically, AC-LAM learns more structured, motion-specific, and displacement-calibrated latent actions and provides stronger supervision for downstream policy learning, outperforming state-of-the-art LAMs across simulated and real-world tabletop tasks.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables4 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 14, 2026

Reconstructing Is Not Acting: Action-Centric Latent Dynamics Modeling

Latent action models (LAMs) learn action representations from unlabeled videos by inferring latent actions from visual transitions and reconstructing future states. However, we identify a fundamental reconstruction-action mismatch\textbf{reconstruction-action mismatch}: lower reconstruction error does not necessarily yield better latent dynamics or downstream performance. We attribute this mismatch to two underconstrained aspects of reconstruction-based latent dynamics modeling: (i) the inverse dynamics model (IDM) is not explicitly encouraged to distinguish action-related transitions from nuisance appearance, and (ii) the forward dynamics model (FDM) can underutilize the inferred latent action by exploiting predictive shortcuts from the current state. To address both limitations, we propose ACT-LAM\textbf{ACT-LAM}, a lightweight action-centric framework that strengthens both action extraction and action utilization. Specifically, its Action Query IDM (AQ-IDM) employs learnable action queries and gated aggregation to selectively extract rich action-related transition cues without strong information bottlenecks. And its Action Token FDM (AT-FDM) projects latent actions into action tokens that progressively interact with evolving state representations, enabling continuous state-aware action conditioning. ACT-LAM further streamlines feature processing to concentrate model capacity on latent dynamics modeling. Extensive experiments on several robotic datasets and the VP2^2 benchmark demonstrate stronger latent action consistency, forward dynamics, and downstream visual planning performance with fewer trainable parameters and lower computational overhead. In particular, ACT-LAM surpasses the previous state of the art by \textbf{7.6%} on the aggregated VP2^2 success rate. Codes at url.
May 13, 2026

Why Latent Actions Fail, and How to Prevent It

Latent action models (LAMs) aim to learn action-like representations from unlabeled videos by compressing frame-to-frame changes. The frames of in-the-wild videos, however, contain not only the agent's own state but exogenous state such as background clutter. Since the exogenous state introduces changes unrelated to actions, it hinders reliable latent action learning. This paper investigates this problem analytically by extending a linear LAM framework to explicitly model exogenous state. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) minimizing the standard reconstruction objective produces latent actions that encode exogenous information from future observation; and (2) learning in a representation space that focuses on endogenous components is a key to mitigating the interference of noise. We further show that previously proposed auxiliary objectives, such as action-supervision, provably encourage latent actions to be consistent across exogenous states. These findings are validated through experiments on both linear and nonlinear LAMs, providing a unified theoretical analysis of how exogenous state hinders latent action learning and why common remedies work.
Oct 12, 2026

UniLAP: A Unified Latent Action Policy for Cross-Embodiment Manipulation

Latent Action Models (LAMs) can capture manipulation priors from action-free videos, but discrete latents usually impose a granularity bottleneck, limiting their ability to represent fine-grained action. Recent continuous alternatives mitigate this, but they are typically used as proxies for world modeling and require a further planning step to produce executable actions. We thus introduce UniLAP, a unified continuous latent-action policy that models the latent space via flow matching and bypasses reliance on future frames during inference. By distilling a LAM teacher with a flow-adaptive objective, UniLAP inherits the teacher's action representation while retaining the multimodal distribution of feasible behaviors. To decouple latent representations from task-irrelevant appearance, we extract a label-free motion target to isolate relevant kinematic cues from spurious visual dynamics. With the established embodiment-agnostic latent manifold, UniLAP can be easily adapted to novel platforms. Pretrained on multi-source videos at a compact 1.1B parameter scale, UniLAP outperforms state-of-the-art latent-action and Vision-Language-Action (VLA) baselines across hand pose forecasting, single-arm and humanoid manipulation, and real-world deployment.