Autoencoder-Based Parameter Estimation for Superposed Multi-Component Damped Sinusoidal Signals
Organizations: Graduate School of Integrative Science and Engineering, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan · Research Center for Space Science, Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan · Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan · Graduate School of Information and Data Science and Department of Design and Data Science, Tokyo City University, 3-3-1 Ushikubo-Nishi, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 224-8551, Japan ·
Abstract
Damped sinusoidal oscillations are widely observed in many physical systems, and their analysis provides access to underlying physical properties. However, parameter estimation becomes difficult when the signal decays rapidly, multiple components are superposed, and observational noise is present. In this study, we develop an autoencoder-based method that uses the latent space to estimate the frequency, phase, decay time, and amplitude of each component in noisy multi-component damped sinusoidal signals. We investigate multi-component cases under Gaussian-distribution training and further examine the effect of the training-data distribution through comparisons between Gaussian and uniform training. The performance is evaluated through waveform reconstruction and parameter-estimation accuracy. We find that the proposed method can estimate the parameters with high accuracy even in challenging setups, such as those involving a subdominant component or nearly opposite-phase components, while remaining reasonably robust when the training distribution is less informative. This demonstrates its potential as a tool for analyzing short-duration, noisy signals.
Figures & tables
| Case | Explanation | #Components | Training | Validation | Noise level (SNR [dB]) | Result | Special setting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2G-sub | 2.2.1 , Fig. 2 , Table 3 | 2 | G (8,000) | G (2,000) | 3.1 , Fig. 8 , Table 10 | Subdominant component | |
| 2G-opp | 2.2.1 , Fig. 3 , Table 4 | 2 | G (8,000) | G (2,000) | 3.1 , Fig. 9 , Table 10 | Nearly opposite phases | |
| 5G | 2.2.2 , Fig. 4 , Table 5 | 5 | G (8,000) | G (2,000) | 3.2 , Figs. 10 11 , Table 12 | ||
| 1G | 2.2.3 , Fig. 5 , Table 6 | 1 | G (4,000) | G (1,000) | 3.3.1 , Figs. 12 , 14 , Table 13 | ||
| 1U | 2.2.3 , Fig. 5 , Table 6 | 1 | U (4,000) | G (1,000) | 3.3.1 , Figs. 13 , 14 , Table 13 | ||
| 2G | 2.2.4 , Fig. 6 , Table 7 | 2 | G (990,000) | G (10,000) | 3.3.2 , Fig. 15 , Table 14 |
| Case | Learning rate | Encoder epochs | Decoder epochs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2G-sub | 0.001 | 350 | 200 |
| 2G-opp | 0.001 | 500 | 500 |
| 5G | 0.005 | 350 | 200 |
| 1G | 0.001 | 350 | 400 |
| 1U | 0.001 | 350 | 400 |
| 2G | 0.0001 | 250 | 150 |
Parameter Estimation
Parameter estimation studies how to infer unknown quantities in statistical, physical, and machine-learning models from observed data.
See all 144 papers