Towards Effective In-context Cross-domain Knowledge Transfer via Domain-invariant-neurons-based Retrieval

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved substantial advances in logical reasoning, yet they continue to lag behind human-level performance. In-context learning provides a viable solution that boosts the model's performance via prompting its input with expert-curated, in-domain exemplars. However, in many real-world, expertise-scarce domains, such as low-resource scientific disciplines, emerging biomedical subfields, or niche legal jurisdictions, such high-quality in-domain demonstrations are inherently limited or entirely unavailable, thereby constraining the general applicability of these approaches. To mitigate this limitation, recent efforts have explored the retrieval of cross-domain samples as surrogate in-context demonstrations. Nevertheless, the resulting gains remain modest. This is largely attributable to the pronounced domain shift between source and target distributions, which impedes the model's ability to effectively identify and exploit underlying shared structures or latent reasoning patterns. Consequently, when relying solely on raw textual prompting, LLMs struggle to abstract and transfer such cross-domain knowledge in a robust and systematic manner. To address these issues, we propose CoDA, which employs a lightweight adapter to directly intervene in the intermediate hidden states. By combining feature-based distillation of CoT-enriched reference representations with Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) for kernelized distribution matching, our method aligns the latent reasoning representation of the source and target domains. Extensive experimental results on multiple logical reasoning tasks across various model families validate the efficacy of CoDA by significantly outperforming the previous state-of-the-art baselines by a large margin.

Despite its success, existing in-context learning (ICL) relies on in-domain expert demonstrations, limiting its applicability when expert annotations are scarce. We posit that different domains may share underlying reasoning structures, enabling source-domain demonstrations to improve target-domain inference despite semantic mismatch. To test this hypothesis, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study of different retrieval methods to validate the feasibility of achieving cross-domain knowledge transfer under the in-context learning setting. Our results demonstrate conditional positive transfer in cross-domain ICL. We identify a clear example absorption threshold: beyond it, positive transfer becomes more likely, and additional demonstrations yield larger gains. Further analysis suggests that these gains stem from reasoning structure repair by retrieved cross-domain examples, rather than semantic cues. Overall, our study validates the feasibility of leveraging cross-domain knowledge transfer to improve cross-domain ICL performance, motivating the community to explore designing more effective retrieval approaches for this novel direction.\footnote{Our implementation is available at https://github.com/littlelaska/ICL-TF4LR}

Recent studies on reinforcement learning (RL) report seemingly conflicting evidence about large language model (LLM) reasoning. Training on mathematics can improve performance in other domains, yet gains in Pass@1 can coincide with lower Pass@$N$ than the base model. This raises a fundamental question: does RL expand an LLM's reasoning boundary, or merely reweight its existing reasoning space? We revisit these phenomena across Qwen and Gemma model families, showing both cross-domain gains and forgetting, while coverage at large sampling budgets increases on some tasks and decreases on others. Detailed analysis of solution traces before and after RL indicates a shift in the reasoning strategies the model employs, motivating a two-stage autoregressive policy model that separates strategy selection from problem-specific execution. Within this framework, we prove how RL's implicit bias reshapes strategy preferences, allowing gains on some tasks while suppressing strategies required by others. This mechanism can also broaden or narrow coverage at a given sampling budget even without expanding strategy support. We further provide theoretical justifications for log-sigmoid and log-linear scaling laws in RL compute, and evaluate their predictive power. Together, these results connect changes in strategy selection to cross-domain transfer, reasoning coverage, and compute scaling.