SVC 2026: the Second Multimodal Deception Detection Challenge and the First Domain Generalized Remote Physiological Measurement Challenge
Authors: Dongliang Zhu, Zhiyi Niu, Bo Zhao, Jiajian Huang, Shuo Ye, Xun Lin, Hui Ma, Taorui Wang, Jiayu Zhang, Chunmei Zhu, Junzhe Cao, Yingjie Ma, Rencheng Song, Albert Clapés, Sergio Escalera, Dan Guo, Zitong Yu
Organizations: Wuhan University · Hefei University of Technology · Great Bay University · Tsinghua University · The Chinese University of Hong Kong · Sun Yat-sen University · University of Barcelona
Subtle visual signals, although difficult to perceive with the naked eye, contain important information that can reveal hidden patterns in visual data. These signals play a key role in many applications, including biometric security, multimedia forensics, medical diagnosis, industrial inspection, and affective computing. With the rapid development of computer vision and representation learning techniques, detecting and interpreting such subtle signals has become an emerging research direction. However, existing studies often focus on specific tasks or modalities, and models still face challenges in robustness, representation ability, and generalization when handling subtle and weak signals in real-world environments. To promote research in this area, we organize the Subtle visual Challenge, which aims to learn robust representations for subtle visual signals. The challenge includes two tasks: cross-domain multimodal deception detection and remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) estimation. We hope that this challenge will encourage the development of more robust and generalizable models for subtle visual understanding, and further advance research in computer vision and multimodal learning. A total of 22 teams submitted their final results to this workshop competition, and the corresponding baseline models have been released on the MMDD2026 platform\footnote{https://sites.google.com/view/svc-cvpr26}
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Examples of deceptive actions.
Figure 2: Sample examples from the DOLOS, Bag-of-Lies, and MU3D datasets.
Dataset
#Subjects
Total
Deceptive
Truthful
Dec/Truth
Scenario
Real Life Trials [ 7 ]
56
121
61
60
1.02
Courtroom
Bag of Lies [ 1 ]
35
325
162
163
0.99
Lab
MU3D [ 6 ]
80
320
160
160
1.00
Lab
Box of Lies [ 11 ]
26
1049
862
187
4.61
Gameshow
DOLOS [ 3 ]
213
1675
899
776
1.16
Gameshow
Table 1: Multimodal deception detection datasets used in the challenge.