Organizations: Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, 639798, Singapore · Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Rd, 487372, Singapore · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 6/F, Core D, Lui Che Woo Building, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR, China
Robust multimodal visual analytics remains challenging when heterogeneous modalities provide complementary but input-dependent evidence for decision-making.Existing multimodal learning methods mainly rely on fixed fusion modules or predefined cross-modal interactions, which are often insufficient to adapt to changing modality reliability and to capture fine-grained action cues. To address this issue, we propose a Mixture-of-Modality-Experts (MoME) framework with a Holistic Token Learning (HTL) strategy. MoME enables adaptive collaboration among modality-specific experts, while HTL improves both intra-expert refinement and inter-expert knowledge transfer through class tokens and spatio-temporal tokens. In this way, our method forms a knowledge-centric multimodal learning framework that improves expert specialization while reducing ambiguity in multimodal fusion.We validate the proposed framework on driver action recognition as a representative multimodal understanding taskThe experimental results on the public benchmark show that the proposed MoME framework and the HTL strategy jointly outperform representative single-modal and multimodal baselines. Additional ablation, validation, and visualization results further verify that the proposed HTL strategy improves subtle multimodal understanding and offers better interpretability.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: In-cabin action recognition presents subtle motion pattern and complicated illumination variation, making fine-grained multimodal evidence sparse and unevenly reliable. These challenges therefore requires robust multimodal visual analytics to adaptively integrate knowledge from different sources.
Figure 2: Overview of our proposed Mixture-of-Modality-Experts (MoME) framework enhanced by the Holistic Token Learning (HTL) strategy.
Methods
Modality
Mean-1 Accuracy
Top-1 Accuracy
Pose ( Martin et al., 2019 )
3DS
-
55.17
C3D ( Tran et al., 2015 )
NIR
-
43.41
P3D ( Qiu et al., 2017 )
NIR
-
45.32
CTA-NET ( Wharton et al., 2021 )
RGB
-
65.25
I3D ( Carreira and Zisserman, 2017 )
NIR
-
60.80
Depth
-
60.52
Table 1: The benchmark results of MoME compared with single- and multimodal DAR baselines on Drive&Act ( Martin et al., 2019 ) dataset. “LF” denotes basic late fusion-based multimodal DAR variants implemented with different backbones
Method
Split 0
Split 1
Split 2
Average
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
Early-Fusion
54.19
72.86
52.24
65.70
43.21
63.34
49.88
67.30
Late-Fusion
65.34
84.29
60.16
77.36
59.25
75.19
61.58
78.53
Multifuser ( Wang et al., 2024b )
71.95
85.42
72.07
82.85
68.00
78.89
70.67
82.39
Ours
74.32
88.35
7 3.54
82.91
73.60
80.56
73.82
83.94
Table 2: Quantitative comparison across different fusion methods based on the UniformerV2 ( Li et al., 2023a ) backbone.
Structure
Strategy
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
MoE
None
72.14
87.94
MoME
None
73.48
88.03
MoME
MoDE ( Xie et al., 2024 )
72.98
88.17
MoME
HTL
74.32
88.35
Table 3: Ablation study results of MoME design and comparison between HTL and MoDE ( Xie et al., 2024 )
Methods
Mean-1 Acc.
Top-1 Acc.
Basic Fine-tuning
63.02
83.08
Deep supervision ( Lee et al., 2015 )
66.10
83.71
Self-distillation ( Sultana et al., 2022 )
63.96
83.44
Holistic Token Learning -
69.18
84.16
Table 4: HTL can also be applied to signal-modality models. The single modality variant HTL - can contribute more performance improvement than other self-distillation-like methods.
Figure 3: HTL can guide the model to concentrate on subtle spatio-temporal cues when handling challenging samples.
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) presents a naturally compatible and scalable framework for multimodal learning, demonstrating strong adaptability across diverse modalities and tasks. Despite its growing success, a comprehensive and systematic review on the MoE metho addressing multimodal challenges remains lacking. Existing surveys tend to evaluate either multimodal learning or MoE independently from method taxonomy, overlooking the unique interplay between them. This survey fills that gap by answering a central question: How does MoE effectively resolve multimodal challenges? We approach this from three key perspectives: (1) MoE as an Efficient Multimodal Engine: enabling scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth and mitigating modality redundancy through selective expert activation; (2) MoE as a Multimodal Representation Learner: integrating complementary multi-opinion expert knowledge to enrich alignment and interaction representations; and (3) MoE as a Multimodal Adapter: providing a modular and flexible mechanism to model imperfect data scenarios such as modality imbalance and missing modality. Through our extensive literature review, we identify critical research gaps, including interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning. We position this survey as a foundation for future research toward interpretable and sustainable multimodal Mixture-of-Experts system.
Liangwei Nathan Zheng, Wei Emma Zhang, Olaf Maennel +2
Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable performance on vision-language tasks. However, we identify a puzzling phenomenon termed Seeing but Not Thinking: models accurately perceive image content yet fail in subsequent reasoning, while correctly solving identical problems presented as pure text. Through systematic analysis, we first verify that cross-modal semantic sharing exists in MoE architectures, ruling out semantic alignment failure as the sole explanation. We then reveal that visual experts and domain experts exhibit layer-wise separation, with image inputs inducing significant routing divergence from text inputs in middle layers where domain experts concentrate. Based on these findings, we propose the Routing Distraction hypothesis: when processing visual inputs, the routing mechanism fails to adequately activate task-relevant reasoning experts. To validate this hypothesis, we design a routing-guided intervention method that enhances domain expert activation. Experiments on three multimodal MoE models across six benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements, with gains of up to 3.17% on complex visual reasoning tasks. Our analysis further reveals that domain expert identification locates cognitive functions rather than sample-specific solutions, enabling effective transfer across tasks with different information structures.
Multimodal inputs are inherently heterogeneous, not only across modalities but also in the information pathways required for effective prediction. To address this limitation, we propose InstMoE, an adaptive expert routing framework for multimodal learning. InstMoE dynamically routes each input to specialized unimodal and cross-modal experts, allowing the model to adapt its information pathways to the characteristics of the input. However, routing can be misled when modality-specific variations obscure task-relevant semantics. Such irrelevant variations may distort routing decisions, causing inputs to be assigned to inappropriate experts. We therefore introduce a Contrastive Semantic Alignment module, which encourages semantically similar inputs to share task-relevant representations while suppressing irrelevant modality-specific variations. Experiments on multimodal sentiment analysis benchmarks demonstrate that InstMoE achieves state-of-the-art performance on CMU-MOSEI and CH-SIMS v2 while using substantially fewer parameters than competitive baselines. Further analysis shows that different inputs exhibit distinct expert preferences, demonstrating that InstMoE moves beyond fixed fusion toward adaptive multimodal computation.
Guimin Hu, Xiang He, Yingjian Li +3
Guangdong University of Technology · University of Copenhagen · Pengcheng Laboratory +1