Location Is All You Need: Continuous Spatiotemporal Neural Representations of Earth Observation Data

Recent advances in remote sensing have led to an increase in the number of available foundation models; each trained on different modalities, datasets, and objectives, yet capturing only part of the vast geospatial knowledge landscape. While these models show strong results within their respective domains, their capabilities remain complementary rather than unified. Therefore, instead of choosing one model over another, we aim to combine their strengths into a single shared representation. We introduce GeoSANE, a geospatial model foundry that learns a unified neural representation from the weights of existing foundation models and task-specific models, able to generate novel neural networks weights on-demand. Given a target architecture, GeoSANE generates weights ready for finetuning for classification, segmentation, and detection tasks across multiple modalities. Models generated by GeoSANE consistently outperform their counterparts trained from scratch, match or surpass state-of-the-art remote sensing foundation models, and outperform models obtained through pruning or knowledge distillation when generating lightweight networks. Evaluations across ten diverse datasets and on GEO-Bench confirm its strong generalization capabilities. By shifting from pre-training to weight generation, GeoSANE introduces a new framework for unifying and transferring geospatial knowledge across models and tasks. Code is available at hsg-aiml.github.io/GeoSANE/.

Pretraining generalist Earth observation foundation models requires data that combine several sensors, varied temporal sampling and, increasingly, text, yet open datasets rarely provide all three in one consistent, easily accessible form. We introduce MajorTOM:Elliot Pretrain, a collection of 279,166 tiles of 10 km drawn from the Major-TOM grid by clustering AlphaEarth embeddings. Each tile stacks Sentinel-2 L1C, Landsat-8/9, Sentinel-1 RTC, Copernicus DEM and ESA WorldCover on a shared 1056x1056-pixel, 10 m grid, complemented by cloud masks, OpenStreetMap entities and ERA5 weather. The tiles are partitioned into three temporal regimes, Monotemporal (250,000 tiles, one acquisition), Monthly (12,500 tiles, twelve acquisitions spread over the annual cycle) and Burst (16,666 tiles, six acquisitions within 30 days), and are released as 6.3 TB of Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs indexed by TACO v3 Parquet metadata, a standard that allows cloud streaming, efficient data access, and filtering before any pixel is read. A companion library derives sensor-tagged fact sheets, captions and 16 families of vision-language tasks from these layers at load time. We test our design choices in short pretraining runs of OlmoEarth-Base. First, a 25% subset of Major-TOM Core-S2L2A curated with AlphaEarth embeddings matches or exceeds the full corpus on 8 of 9 benchmarks. Second, on Elliot-Pretrain, adding Landsat-8/9 improves or matches Sentinel-2 only pretraining on every benchmark. Third, using DEM and WorldCover as prediction targets during pretraining further improves 8 of 9 benchmarks, while giving the same maps to the encoder as inputs degrades 5 of 9. Fourth, Sentinel-1 helps on 7 of 9 benchmarks, particularly on benchmarks with radar inputs. Fifth, rule-based captions match a small language model at no cost. The dataset is openly available at https://source.coop/major-tom/elliot-pretrain.

Earth-observation (EO) foundation models provide reusable embeddings, yet downstream task accuracy does not reveal whether these representations encode geographic information, which may be beneficial for location-aware applications but potentially detrimental when representations invariant to geographic location are desired. We therefore evaluate the geographic coordinate robustness of Tessera v1, Tessera v1.1, and AlphaEarth by testing whether coordinates can be predicted from the embedding representations using 284 quality-verified European solar farms from 2024. We assessed geographic information content information through the association between cosine and geodesic distances and through prediction of projected coordinates in EPSG:3035. Embeddings from all three EO foundation models contain recoverable geographic information. All prediction models significantly outperform training-range uniform random sampling baselines, with AlphaEarth exhibiting the strongest distance association and lowest mean geodesic error. Both Tessera variants also yielded higher geographic distance correlations than the Sentinel-2 controls. These findings motivate geographic information content as an additional criterion for auditing EO foundation models.