Multimodal retrieval systems struggle to resolve image-text queries against text-only corpora: the best vision-language encoder achieves only 27.6 nDCG@10 on MM-BRIGHT, underperforming strong text-only retrievers. We argue the bottleneck is not the retriever but the query -- raw multimodal queries entangle visual descriptions, conversational noise, and retrieval intent in ways that systematically degrade embedding similarity. We present BRIDGE, a two-component system that resolves this mismatch without multimodal encoders. FORGE (Focused Retrieval Query Generator) is a query alignment model trained via reinforcement learning, which distills noisy multimodal queries into compact, retrieval-optimized search strings. LENS (Language-Enhanced Neural Search) is a reasoning-enhanced dense retriever fine-tuned on reasoning-intensive retrieval data to handle the intent-rich queries FORGE produces. Evaluated on MM-BRIGHT (2,803 queries, 29 domains), BRIDGE achieves 29.7 nDCG@10, surpassing all multimodal encoder baselines including Nomic-Vision (27.6). When FORGE is applied as a plug-and-play aligner on top of Nomic-Vision, the combined system reaches 33.3 nDCG@10 -- exceeding the best text-only retriever (32.2) -- demonstrating that query alignment is the key bottleneck in multimodal-to-text retrieval. https://github.com/mm-bright/multimodal-reasoning-retrieval
Figures & tables
Figure 1: An example of BRIDGE in action. The raw multimodal query mixes conversational context and visual content, producing a noisy embedding that fails to retrieve the correct document. FORGE distills the query into a compact, intent-focused search string that LENS successfully resolves against the text corpus.
Figure 2: Overview of the BRIDGE framework. Given a multimodal query (qt,qv) , GPT-4o first generates a dense image caption δ(qv) . FORGE then receives the concatenated input (qt,δ(qv)) and distills it into a compact, retrieval-optimized query q^ via reinforcement-learned alignment. LENS encodes q^ and retrieves the final ranked documents from the text corpus. No multimodal encoder is used at retrieval time.
DOMAIN
BGE-VL
CLIP
GME-2B
GME-7B
JINA-CLIP
NOMIC
SIGLIP
BRIDGE
STEM & Life Sciences
Acad
4.2
4.8
16.2
27.6
22.3
22.6
3.6
27.7
Bio
5.7
14.8
22.9
15.2
20.5
26.9
11.9
41.1
Chem
10.8
9.6
27.2
21.9
30.6
30.6
11.6
34.3
Phys
6.8
6.1
13.3
14.0
14.4
17.2
7.3
20.7
Math
13.1
17.9
16.4
9.3
27.0
34.0
15.3
31.9
Table 1: Per-domain nDCG@10 on MM-BRIGHT (multimodal-to-text track) across all 29 domains, grouped by thematic category. BRIDGE achieves the highest score in 22 out of 29 domains. Bold denotes the best score per row.
Figure 3: Effect of FORGE LLM backbone on BRIDGE performance (nDCG@10 averaged over 29 MM-BRIGHT domains). Llama-3.2-11B achieves the strongest result (31.0), outperforming both larger models (Qwen2.5-72B: 29.3) and the GPT-4o zero-shot baseline (29.6). Our default FORGE backbone (Qwen2.5-7B, 29.7 ) offers the best performance-to-cost tradeoff.
Configuration
nDCG@10
LENS only (raw qt , no image)
25.4
LENS + Caption (raw qt+δ(qv) )
27.8
LENS + FORGE-SFT (supervised rewriter)
28.5
LENS + FORGE-RL (full BRIDGE)
29.7
Table 2: Component ablation on MM-BRIGHT. Each row adds one component on top of the previous. Default BRIDGE configuration in bold .
Base Retriever
Base
+FORGE
Δ
BM25
8.5
15.8
+7.3
GME-Qwen2-VL-7B
22.0
28.3
+6.3
Nomic-Vision
27.6
33.3
+5.7
LENS (ours)
25.4
29.7
+4.3
Table 3: FORGE applied to different base retrievers on MM-BRIGHT. Δ = absolute nDCG@10 gain from FORGE alignment.
Query Method
nDCG@10
Raw qt (no rewrite)
25.4
HyDE [ 13 ]
11.2
Query2Doc [ 41 ]
14.5
FORGE-RL (ours)
29.7
Table 4: Comparison of query rewriting strategies on MM-BRIGHT, all using LENS as the base retriever. FORGE-RL denotes our full RL-trained aligner.
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have substantially expanded the capabilities of multimodal retrieval, enabling systems to align and retrieve information across visual and textual modalities. Yet, existing benchmarks largely focus on coarse-grained or single-condition alignment, overlooking real-world scenarios where user queries specify multiple interdependent constraints across modalities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MCMR (Multi-Conditional Multimodal Retrieval): a large-scale benchmark designed to evaluate fine-grained, multi-condition cross-modal retrieval under natural-language queries. MCMR spans five product domains: upper and bottom clothing, jewelry, shoes, and furniture. It also preserves rich long-form metadata essential for compositional matching. Each query integrates complementary visual and textual attributes, requiring models to jointly satisfy all specified conditions for relevance. We benchmark a diverse suite of MLLM-based multimodal retrievers and vision-language rerankers to assess their condition-aware reasoning abilities. Experimental results reveal: (i) distinct modality asymmetries across models; (ii) visual cues dominate early-rank precision, while textual metadata stabilizes long-tail ordering; and (iii) MLLM-based pointwise rerankers markedly improve fine-grained matching by explicitly verifying query-candidate consistency. Overall, MCMR establishes a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing multimodal retrieval toward compositional, constraint-aware, and interpretable understanding. Our code and dataset is available at https://github.com/EIT-NLP/MCMR
Xuan Lu, Kangle Li, Haohang Huang +3
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Institute of Digital Twin, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo · Ningbo Key Laboratory of Spatial Intelligence and Digital Derivative +1
Different machine learning models can represent the same underlying concept in different ways. This variability is particularly valuable for in-the-wild multimodal retrieval, where the objective is to identify the corresponding representation in one modality given another modality as input. This challenge can be effectively framed as a representation alignment problem. For example, given a sentence encoded by a language model, retrieve the most semantically aligned image based on representations produced by an image encoder, or vice versa. To gain insights into the performance impact of different metrics, embedding spaces, and representation alignment for retrieval tasks, we first empirically investigate the geometric relationships between visual and textual embeddings derived from both vision-language models and combined unimodal models. We then align these representations using four standard similarity metrics as well as two learned ones, implemented via neural networks of different architectures with varying losses across multiple benchmarks. Our experimental findings indicate that cosine similarity consistently outperforms all the investigated metrics in representation alignment tasks, and that Wasserstein distance provides a complementary perspective on cross-modal distributional differences. We also observe that our proposed custom contrastive loss is advantageous over the MSE loss for aligning image and text representations, for both multilayer perceptrons and transformer-based models. Taken together, our findings offer novel insights and practical considerations for researchers working in multimodal information retrieval, particularly in real-world, cross-modal applications. Our code is publicly available.
Fan Xu, Luis A. Leiva
aDepartment of Computer Science, University of Luxembourg, 6, avenue de la Fonte, Esch-sur-Alzette, L-4364, Luxembourg
Multi-modal retrieval has become increasingly critical for handling the growing volume of integrated visual-textual data in real-world applications, but existing frameworks rely on implicit fusion via text encoder self-attention, limiting explicit cross-modal semantic alignment. To address this gap, this paper proposes UniCA (Unified Cross-Attention Encoder), a multi-modal retrieval model with four key innovations: 1) a bi-directional cross-attention (Bi-CA) block that enables active semantic exchange between visual and textual tokens prior to concatenation, capturing inter-modal correlations more efficiently. 2) a Positive Similarity Loss that optimizes absolute semantic proximity between query and positive candidate embeddings. 3) a streamlined dataset UMR-S10 (Universal Multimodal Retrieval Sample 10%) to reduce computational costs while retaining semantic diversity and task representativeness. 4) an experimental validation on the WebQA benchmark demonstrates that UniCA outperforms the baseline model across Hybrid and Image-Text tasks, achieving improvements of up to 4.09% in Recall@5, 3.28% in Recall@10, and 3.96% in MRR@1 for the hybrid task. UniCA provides an efficient and robust solution for multi-modal retrieval, lowering deployment barriers through its lightweight dataset and enhanced fusion mechanism.
Yini Huang, Wenlong Zhang
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangdong, China · Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China