Domain-Aware Hybrid Quantum Learning via Correlation-Guided Circuit Design for Crime Pattern Analytics
Authors: Niloy Das, Apurba Adhikary, Sheikh Salman Hassan, Tanvir Zaman Khan, Yu Qiao, Zhu Han, Choong Seon Hong
Organizations: Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh · Institute for Imaging, Data, and Communications (IDCOM), The University of Edinburgh, UK · School of Information Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004-4005, USA · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Republic of Korea
Crime pattern analysis is critical for law enforcement and predictive policing, yet the surge in criminal activities from rapid urbanization creates high-dimensional, imbalanced datasets that challenge traditional classification methods. This study presents a quantum-classical comparison framework for crime analytics, evaluating four computational paradigms: quantum models, classical baseline machine learning models, and two hybrid quantum-classical architectures. Using 16-year crime statistics, we systematically assess classification performance and computational efficiency under rigorous cross-validation methods. Experimental results show that quantum-inspired approaches, particularly QAOA, achieve up to 84.6% accuracy, while requiring fewer trainable parameters than classical baselines, suggesting practical advantages for memory-constrained edge deployment. The proposed correlation-aware circuit design demonstrates the potential of incorporating domain-specific feature relationships into quantum models. Furthermore, hybrid approaches exhibit competitive training efficiency, making them suitable candidates for resource-constrained environments. The framework's low computational overhead and compact parameter footprint suggest potential advantages for wireless sensor network deployments in smart city surveillance systems, where distributed nodes perform localized crime analytics with minimal communication costs. Our findings provide a preliminary empirical assessment of quantum-enhanced machine learning for structured crime data and motivate further investigation with larger datasets and realistic quantum hardware considerations.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : System architecture of the proposed framework showing the complete pipeline.
Fig. 2 : VQC circuit structure (4-qubit, 2-layer). Layer 0 employs correlation-aware CNOT entanglement (weighted by detected feature correlations ρ>0.5 ), while Layer 1 uses a standard CNOT ladder for uniform entanglement.
Category
Model
Key Parameters
Quantum (Simulation) †
VQC
4-6 qubits, 2-3 layers
QAOA
4-6 qubits, 2-3 p -layers
Q-Kernel SVM
4 qubits, RBF kernel
Q → C Hybrid
Q → RF
6 qubits → 100 trees
Q → SVM
6 qubits → RBF kernel
Q → LogReg
6 qubits → logistic
TABLE I : Model Configurations
Category
Metric
Definition / Formula
Classification
Accuracy
Acc=NTP+TN (overall correctness)
Precision
Prec=TP+FPTP (weighted avg. across classes)
Recall
Rec=TP+FNTP (weighted avg. across classes)
F1-Score
F1=2⋅Prec+RecPrec⋅Rec (harmonic mean, weighted)
Quantum Efficiency
Circuit Depth
Total gate count: d=∑ℓ∣Urot(ℓ)∣+∣Uent∣
Parameter Count
Trainable parameters: ∣θ∣=nq×L (qubits × layers)
TABLE II : Evaluation Metrics and Definitions
Fig. 3 : Per-class accuracy comparison highlights quantum advantage on imbalanced categories in preliminary evaluation.
Fig. 4 : Circuit expressibility as a function of quantum layers. Expressibility increases from 0.35 to 0.79 with layer depth.
Model
Type
Acc.
Prec.
Rec.
F1
Quantum-Inspired (Simulation) †
QAOA (4q, 2L)
Quantum
0.85
0.88
0.85
0.85
QAOA (6q, 3L)
Quantum
0.55
0.65
0.55
0.56
VQC (6q, 3L)
Quantum
0.55
0.53
0.55
0.53
VQC (4q, 2L)
Quantum
0.55
0.52
0.55
0.52
QKernel SVM
Quantum
0.40
0.45
0.40
0.42
TABLE III : Preliminary performance comparison (single train–test split). Best result per category in bold .
Model
Type
Acc. ± CI
F1 ± CI
Quantum-Inspired (Simulation) †
QAOA (6q, 3L)
Quantum
0.846 ± 0.019
0.830 ± 0.021
QAOA (4q, 2L)
Quantum
0.803 ± 0.024
0.779 ± 0.026
C → Q Hybrid
PCA → QAOA
C → Q
0.803 ± 0.024
0.779 ± 0.026
Best Classical Baseline
TABLE IV : Robust evaluation of top-performing models under 5-fold stratified CV. Best result per category in bold .
Model
Mean (s)
Params
Infer. O(⋅)
Acc. ± CI
Sig.
Quantum-Inspired
QAOA (4q, 2L)
0.006
16
O(p⋅nq)
0.803±0.024
∗∗∗
QAOA (6q, 3L)
0.004
36
O(p⋅nq)
0.846±0.019
∗∗∗
VQC (4q, 2L)
0.015
8
O(L⋅nq)
0.676±0.022
∗∗∗
VQC (6q, 3L)
0.027
18
O(L⋅nq)
0.686±0.021
∗∗∗
QKernel SVM
0.075
—
O(N⋅d)
0.359±0.028
∗∗∗
TABLE V : Training efficiency, theoretical complexity, and statistical significance.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is increasingly recognized as one of the most promising near-term applications of quantum computing, viewed as a next-frontier candidate beyond purely classical approaches. Hybrid quantum-classical models operationalize this potential by embedding a parameterized quantum circuit within a model where all other components remain classical-a design already applied to chemistry simulation, financial modeling, and image classification. However, their deployment in privacy-sensitive, multi-party settings is constrained by the need to avoid centralizing raw data and by the requirement that modern quantum circuits remain parameter-efficient to stay trainable at scale. In this paper, we address these constraints by evaluating federated learning (FL) as a means of combining a hybrid quantum-classical active party with a classical passive party, using Sherpa.ai's Blind Vertical FL (SBVFL) protocol to avoid centralizing raw data, while drastically reducing communication. We construct the split multiplicative periodic parity (SMPP) benchmark, following common QML design practice. On this task, our simulations show that SBVFL raises accuracy from 0.7227 to 0.8757 compared to local training, closely approaching non-private centralized accuracy, and that the hybrid quantum-classical model achieves this with substantially fewer trainable parameters than the classical neural networks and random forest alternatives. These results show that FL enables high-performing, privacy-preserving quantum-classical collaboration without centralizing raw data.
Carlos Cano, Daniel M. Jimenez-Gutierrez, Diego Sal +4
With the rapid growth of interconnected devices, accurately detecting malicious activities in network traffic has become increasingly challenging. Most existing deep learning-based intrusion detection systems treat network flows as independent instances, thereby failing to exploit the relational dependencies inherent in network communications. To address this limitation, we propose Q-AGNN, a Quantum-Enhanced Attentive Graph Neural Network for intrusion detection, where network flows are modeled as nodes and edges represent similarity relationships. Q-AGNN leverages parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) to encode multi-hop neighborhood information into a high-dimensional latent space, inducing a bounded quantum feature map that implements a second-order polynomial graph filter in a quantum-induced Hilbert space. An attention mechanism is subsequently applied to adaptively weight the quantum-enhanced embeddings, allowing the model to focus on the most influential nodes contributing to anomalous behavior. Extensive experiments conducted on four benchmark intrusion detection datasets demonstrate that Q-AGNN achieves competitive or superior detection performance compared to state-of-the-art graph-based methods, while consistently maintaining low false positive rates under hardware-calibrated noise conditions. Moreover, we also executed the Q-AGNN framework on actual IBM quantum hardware to demonstrate the practical operability of the proposed pipeline under real NISQ conditions. These results highlight the effectiveness of integrating quantum-enhanced representations with attention mechanisms for graph-based intrusion detection and underscore the potential of hybrid quantum-classical learning frameworks in cybersecurity applications.
A potential path forward is Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to leverage quantum computing in conjunction with classical machine learning to enhance computing efficiency and the expressiveness of models. In this paper, two different quantum classifiers - Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) - are compared with three classical classifiers as baseline classifiers - Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) - on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset. The quantum circuits were created in the PennyLane framework and simulated on a classical backend. However, in terms of accuracy, classical Logistic Regression performed better with an accuracy of 97.8%, classical SVM and QSVM with an accuracy of 95.6% each, although the Quantum VQC achieved a lower accuracy of 88.9% and had a recall of 100% for the benign class, though it correctly identified only 12 of the 17 malignant cases (a malignant-class recall of approximately 70.6%). The drawback of quantum models is the higher training time; however, since the quantum circuit needs to be classically simulated, the quantum SVM took 23.29 seconds compared to less than 0.01 seconds for the classical linear models. These results indicate that for small structured datasets, classifiers based on quantum computing have not yet surpassed well-tuned classical counterparts. In some respects (e.g., benign-class recall), they perform competitively, though not on malignant-class recall, where the VQC in particular performed worse than the classical baselines, which is worth further investigation on real quantum computers.
Anand Kumar Mishra, Ramanuj Awasthi
School of Engineering & Technology (UIET), CSJM University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India