Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used to ground large language models in external knowledge sources. However, when applied to heterogeneous corpora and multi-step queries, Naive RAG pipelines often degrade in quality due to flat knowledge representations and the absence of explicit workflows. In this work, we introduce DCD (Domain-Collection-Document), a domain-oriented design to structure knowledge and control query processing in RAG systems without modifying the underlying language model. The proposed approach relies on a hierarchical decomposition of the information space and multi-stage routing based on structured model outputs, enabling progressive restriction of both retrieval and generation scopes. The architecture is complemented by smart chunking, hybrid retrieval, and integrated validation and generation guardrail mechanisms. We describe the DCD architecture and workflow and discuss evaluation results on synthetic evaluation dataset, highlighting their impact on robustness, factual accuracy, and answer relevance in applied RAG scenarios.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The difference between the RAG and DCD approaches
Figure 2: Overview of the DCD retrieval and response generation workflow
Figure 3: Smart chunking pipeline
Pipeline
SB_ARC
SB_CR
SB_FA
RCS
D_match
C_match
Naive RAG
0.655
0.893
0.733
1.288
0.56
0.90
Naive + Reranker
0.667
0.855
0.678
1.230
0.55
0.97
Contextual RAG
0.917
0.973
0.823
1.982
1.00
1.00
RAPTOR
0.850
0.940
0.808
1.827
0.88
0.92
DCD
0.885
0.948
0.965
1.925
0.96
0.99
DCD + Reranker
0.893
0.965
0.962
1.945
0.97
0.99
Table 1: Results on the synthetic evaluation dataset
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in external knowledge, but conventional pipelines rely on static, single-step retrieval that limits performance on complex queries. This paper presents an Agent-Orchestrated Adaptive RAG framework that introduces dynamic query decomposition, iterative retrieval, and a bounded self-reflective evaluation loop. We evaluate the system across two complementary datasets: a domain-specific DevOps knowledge base and the multi-hop reasoning benchmark MuSiQue. Using metrics that include overall score, citation accuracy, mean reciprocal rank, and topic coverage, we find that query decomposition yields consistent gains in the structured domain (overall score +0.04, MRR +0.17 on DevOps) but degrades ranking precision on the multi-hop benchmark, while the reflection mechanism improves citation accuracy at a substantial latency cost. These contrasting results show that agentic enhancements are not universally beneficial and must be applied selectively according to query and domain characteristics. Our findings argue for adaptive, cost-aware orchestration rather than uniformly aggressive reasoning pipelines.
Anuj Maharjan, Devinder Kaur, Richard Molyet
Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Toledo Toledo, OH, USA
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are widely used in institutional question answering settings where responses must be grounded in authoritative documentation (Gao et al., 2023). In entity-dense domains where relevant information is distributed across heterogeneous documents, vector-only retrieval often produces fragmented evidence and increases dependence on inference-time reasoning (Zhao et al., 2024). This paper introduces GRACE-RAG, a retrieval-governed, graph-augmented RAG architecture that externalizes structural reasoning from the generative stage to a structured retrieval layer, resolving structural ambiguity offline, enabling deployment on self-hosted lightweight models calibrated to closed-domain institutional vocabulary. Experiments across three model capacities: Mistral 24B, GPT OSS 120B, and Gemini 2.5 Flash show consistent improvements in completeness, depth, and anticipatory coverage, with overall quality gains of up to 20% under mid-scale models, indicating that retrieval architecture governs structural quality over model scale, reducing computational and latency footprint without dependence on proprietary systems.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines typically rely on a fixed indexing and retrieval configuration determined at preprocessing time. This one-size-fits-all design is ill-suited to domain-expert settings, where heterogeneous queries require different chunking granularities, metadata constraints, and source-selection strategies. As a result, configurations that are effective for one family of queries often perform poorly for others. In this paper, we introduce ORDER (Optimal Routing for Dynamic Evidence Retrieval), a query-conditioned RAG framework that jointly adapts indexing and retrieval to the incoming query. Our approach first discovers semantic clusters over a given set of questions associated to a corpus and learns, for each cluster, a chunking strategy together with a suited metadata filtering and reranking configuration. At inference time, queries are routed to the appropriate pre-built index through nearest-centroid assignment. To further improve retrieval, we propose a supervised query router (QRe) that predicts which collections are most likely to contain relevant evidence, coupled with a Uniform Multi-source Sampler (UMS) that allocates the retrieval budget evenly across the selected sources. We evaluate our framework on large-scale, heterogeneous historical archives and show that conditioning both indexing and retrieval on the query consistently outperforms both naive baselines and strong state-of-the-art RAG systems in complex expert-domain environments.