Organizations: Harbin Institute of Technology · Zhongguancun Academy · Shandong University · Tsinghua University · University of Science and Technology of China
Vision-language models (VLMs) and generative world models are opening new opportunities for embodied navigation. VLMs are increasingly used as direct planners or trajectory predictors, while world models support look-ahead reasoning by imagining future views. Yet predicting a reliable trajectory from a single egocentric observation remains challenging. Current VLMs often generate unstable trajectories, and world models, though able to synthesize plausible futures, do not directly provide the grounded signals needed for navigation learning. This raises a central question: how can generated futures be turned into supervision for grounded trajectory prediction? We present WorldMAP, a teacher--student framework that converts world-model-generated futures into persistent semantic-spatial structure and planning-derived supervision. Its world-model-driven teacher builds semantic-spatial memory from generated videos, grounds task-relevant targets and obstacles, and produces trajectory pseudo-labels through explicit planning. A lightweight student with a multi-hypothesis trajectory head is then trained to predict navigation trajectories directly from vision-language inputs. On Target-Bench, WorldMAP achieves the best ADE and FDE among compared methods, reducing ADE by 18.0% and FDE by 42.1% relative to the best competing baseline, while lifting a small open-source VLM to DTW performance competitive with proprietary models. More broadly, the results suggest that, in embodied navigation, the value of world models may lie less in supplying action-ready imagined evidence than in synthesizing structured supervision for navigation learning.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Teacher–student distillation in WorldMAP. A world-model-driven teacher converts generated futures into grounded training signals for a lightweight vision-language student, which learns to predict navigation trajectories directly from the observation and instruction.
Fig. 2: Motivation and design rationale of WorldMAP. Top : VLM-only prediction and world-model-augmented reasoning remain unreliable for single-observation trajectory prediction. Bottom : WorldMAP organizes navigation around a World-Memory-Action-Perception decomposition, inspired by LeCun’s architecture for autonomous machine intelligence [ 1 ] , and converts generated futures into persistent semantic-spatial structure and planning-derived supervision for a lightweight student predictor.
Fig. 3: Architecture of WorldMAP. A world-model-driven teacher converts generated futures into semantic-spatial memory, task-aware grounding, and cost-BEV planning, and then produces trajectory pseudo-labels for student training. At inference time, only the lightweight student is used to predict the final navigation trajectory.
Fig. 4: Teacher-generated trajectory pseudo-labels from world-model futures. The teacher grounds targets and obstacles across generated views, projects them into a shared BEV planning space, constructs a cost map, and runs FMM to obtain trajectory pseudo-labels for student training.
Method
Method Family
ADE ↓
FDE ↓
DTW ↓
GPT-5.4
Proprietary
94.65
150.52
66.49
o3
112.14
177.27
57.30
Gemini-3-Pro
51.27
67.19
31.63
Qwen3-VL-4B
Open-source
140.42
256.00
136.53
Qwen3-VL-8B
183.93
339.58
177.33
Qwen3-VL-32B
151.21
298.65
108.06
TABLE I: Main results in projected 2D image space on Target-Bench. ADE, FDE, and normalized DTW are computed on projected trajectories in the real first-frame image. Lower is better for all metrics. MindJourney † follows the best-performing configuration reported in the original paper [ 24 ] , using an o-series reasoning model with SVC [ 37 ] , while WorldMAP uses Qwen3-VL-8B as the student backbone.
Fig. 5: Qualitative comparison on Target-Bench. Each row shows one instruction and the projected trajectories from the ground truth and competing methods in the real first-frame image. WorldMAP more consistently follows traversable floor geometry and stops closer to the intended target, whereas baselines are more prone to drift, overshoot, or pass through non-traversable regions.
WorldMAP student backbone
ADE ↓
FDE ↓
DTW ↓
Qwen3-VL-4B
45.07
42.84
33.56
Qwen3-VL-8B
42.06
38.87
31.95
TABLE II: Ablation on WorldMAP student backbone scale.
Fig. 6: VLM-based quality assessment of world-model pseudo-labels. Generated trajectories are evaluated using five criteria: task success, stop accuracy, collision safety, trajectory naturalness, and cross-view consistency. Each trajectory is then categorized as usable, borderline, or reject, and these quality tiers are used in the supervision ablation below. The bottom panel summarizes the resulting quality distribution across world models.
Training supervision
ADE ↓
FDE ↓
DTW ↓
WM pseudo-labels only (usable / borderline)
95.98
141.10
88.25
Train GT only
78.34
121.75
75.09
Train GT + WM pseudo-labels (usable / borderline)
42.85
40.97
31.78
Train GT + WM pseudo-labels (usable)
42.06
38.87
31.95
TABLE III: Ablation on student training supervision.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Fig. 7: Representative examples of projecting Target-Bench 3D SLAM trajectories onto 2D real-world first frames.
Fig. 8: Illustration of our homography protocol.
Fig. 9: Statistics of the processed data.
Fig. 10: Intermediate stages of the teacher pipeline.
Fig. 11: Additional qualitative comparisons across models.
Vision-and-language navigation (VLN) in continuous environments requires an agent to ground instructions in egocentric observations while maintaining spatial understanding across long action sequences. Recent navigation foundation models have shown strong progress by scaling vision-language models, but they often learn navigation primarily as direct action generation, without explicitly modeling world states or predicting their future evolution. We introduce FutureNav, a VLM-based unified world-action modeling framework for vision-and-language navigation. Specifically, FutureNav jointly encodes text, visual, and spatial features and feeds them into the LLM, and optimizes four objectives for simultaneous world and action modeling: an action policy objective for navigation action prediction, inverse and forward dynamics objectives for modeling state transitions, and a future generation objective for predicting future spatial states. This unified architecture strengthens action prediction while explicitly modeling the world, without sacrificing inference speed. Extensive experiments show that, with only a 4B-scale backbone, FutureNav achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple VLN benchmarks and substantially outperforms prior VLN methods, paving the way toward future world-action models for VLN. We will release the code and models to support future research.
Lingfeng Zhang, Zeying Gong, Xiaoshuai Hao +7
Tsinghua University · Pengcheng Laboratory · Xiaomi EV +2
Direct visual navigation policies generate trajectories efficiently but do not explicitly evaluate their future consequences. Generative navigation world models provide this foresight through visual rollouts, which are costly when evaluating multiple candidates. We present LiteNWM, a latent navigation world model that shares visual encoding across candidates and jointly predicts their action-conditioned future representations at multiple horizons, while a learned scorer uses these predictions to select trajectories. In offline evaluations on RECON, SCAND, and SACSoN, LiteNWM reduces macro-averaged trajectory error by 17.56% relative to NoMaD+NWM-XL and achieves a 128.00-fold end-to-end speedup on an RTX 5090. The same evaluator transfers from NoMaD to MBRA without proposer-specific retraining, reducing MBRA's macro-averaged trajectory error by 16.2%. In real-robot experiments in unseen indoor and outdoor environments, LiteNWM improves navigation success from 43.3% to 83.3% relative to NoMaD. These results demonstrate that LiteNWM can be deployed for future-aware planning and closed-loop navigation on a physical robot.
Linkai Liu, Yuntian Zhang, Zhenshan Bing +5
Nanjing University · Imperial College London · Sony AI +1
Driving world models learn rich predictive representations of the surrounding environment from visual observations, yet accurate visual prediction does not necessarily translate into effective trajectory planning. We argue that a key bottleneck lies in the mismatch between visual world states and raw geometric trajectories, which may limit the planner's ability to exploit action-relevant semantics encoded by the world model. To address this issue, we propose World-Model Alignment for Latent Trajectories (WALT), which learns a compact generative trajectory latent space by transferring information from a frozen pretrained driving world model without modifying the world model itself. Rather than directly generating raw waypoints, WALT maps them into compact representations through a dual-branch trajectory autoencoder and transfers semantic knowledge from the frozen visual world model into this trajectory space, encouraging the learned action representation to capture scene-level cues relevant to future motion and planning. Beyond our proposed formulation, we systematically study latent learning based on Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPA) and feature alignment following Representation Alignment (REPA) to investigate how trajectory-only representation learning affects downstream planning. We evaluate WALT on the NAVSIM benchmarks. Relative to the raw-waypoint baseline, WALT improves PDMS from 89.4 to 89.8 on NAVSIMv1 and EPDMS from 87.3 to 87.9 on NAVSIMv2 while reducing trajectory planner FLOPs by 30.5%. These results suggest that preserving world representations while extracting action-relevant information provides an effective interface for world-model-based trajectory planning.
Mingkai Jia, Jiaxin Guo, Zhijian Shu +5
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. · Horizon Robotics. · The Chinese University of Hong Kong. +2