SearchAD: Large-Scale Rare Image Retrieval Dataset for Autonomous Driving

Large-scale autonomous-driving datasets contain vast numbers of recorded scenarios, creating a need for efficient retrieval methods that can identify situations similar to a given query. Existing approaches typically rely on either visual representations or motion-based descriptions, making it difficult to understand their relative strengths and limitations for scenario retrieval. In this work, we present a multimodal framework for autonomous-driving scenario retrieval that combines visual and trajectory-based representations within a unified retrieval pipeline. We investigate two trajectory-based approaches: Exo-Trajectory, an explicit matching method based on surrounding-agent motion, and ScenarioFormer, a transformer-based representation learned from object trajectories using contrastive learning. We compare these approaches against strong vision-based baselines and analyze their behavior across a diverse set of driving scenarios. Experimental results show that trajectory representations provide strong retrieval performance for motion-centric events such as cut-ins, turning maneuvers, and traffic queueing, while visual embeddings excel when appearance cues are informative. Most importantly, combining visual and trajectory information consistently improves retrieval quality, yielding the best overall performance. These findings demonstrate that appearance and motion capture are complementary notions of scenario similarity and motivate multimodal retrieval systems for autonomous-driving data mining, dataset curation, and scenario-based validation.

Understanding the composition of large-scale autonomous driving datasets is essential for safety, robustness, and reliable operation across domains. For example, domain shift between locations could lead to the operating environment being misaligned with the training data, resulting in potentially dangerous performance degradation. Yet, existing data analysis pipelines largely rely on metadata, predefined labels, or manual inspection, which provide limited semantic insight or do not scale. This paper studies set difference captioning: given two subsets of images, the goal is to produce a natural-language hypothesis describing differences between the target and reference set. Building on a two-stage formulation, we adapt the method to autonomous driving by focusing on object-centric patches derived from object detection, which simplifies aggregation and enables attribution of differences to specific object instances or categories. To evaluate this setting in-domain, we introduce a new benchmark, AD-Diff Bench. Low-concentration experiments assess the suitability of set-difference-captioning approaches to sparse, real-world differences. We restrict our experiments to open-weight models to support reproducibility and ease of deployment. The proposed benchmark and analysis provide a step towards practical, human-interpretable dataset introspection for autonomous driving datasets. Our implementation and benchmark dataset are available at https://github.com/KIT-MRT/AD-Diff

Reasoning is essential for autonomous driving (AD) in long-tail scenarios, where vehicles must apply commonsense knowledge, understand spatial relations, infer agent interactions, and make safe decisions. However, existing AD datasets and benchmarks mainly target perception, prediction, or planning, and provide limited supervision for reasoning over realistic long-tail driving scenes. We introduce nuReasoning, a large-scale real-world dataset and benchmark for reasoning-centric AD. Following the lineage of nuScenes and nuPlan, nuReasoning advances real-world AD datasets and benchmarks toward reasoning in long-tail driving scenarios. The dataset contains 20,000 clips, each 20 seconds long, collected across multiple cities, with synchronized multi-camera images, LiDAR data, HD maps, object annotations, and human-verified reasoning annotations spanning Spatial Reasoning, Decision Reasoning, and Counterfactual Reasoning. Unlike prior datasets that focus primarily on visual question answering, nuReasoning supports both reasoning evaluation and planning evaluation, enabling a direct study of how reasoning supervision affects driving performance. Experiments show that fine-tuning VLMs on nuReasoning substantially improves driving-specific question answering, while incorporating reasoning supervision into VLA training improves planning performance even when textual reasoning outputs are disabled at inference time. These results establish nuReasoning as a foundation for evaluating and improving robust, interpretable, reasoning-driven AD systems in realistic long-tail settings.