Degradation-Consistent Paired Training for Robust AI-Generated Image Detection
Organizations: Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom · School of Electronic Information, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China
Abstract
AI-generated image detectors suffer significant performance degradation under real-world image corruptions such as JPEG compression, Gaussian blur, and resolution downsampling. We observe that state-of-the-art methods, including B-Free, treat degradation robustness as a byproduct of data augmentation rather than an explicit training objective. In this work, we propose Degradation-Consistent Paired Training (DCPT), a simple yet effective training strategy that explicitly enforces robustness through paired consistency constraints. For each training image, we construct a clean view and a degraded view, then impose two constraints: a feature consistency loss that minimizes the cosine distance between clean and degraded representations, and a prediction consistency loss based on symmetric KL divergence that aligns output distributions across views. DCPT adds zero additional parameters and zero inference overhead. Experiments on the Synthbuster benchmark (9 generators, 8 degradation conditions) demonstrate that DCPT improves the degraded-condition average accuracy by 9.1 percentage points compared to an identical baseline without paired training, while sacrificing only 0.9% clean accuracy. The improvement is most pronounced under JPEG compression (+15.7% to +17.9%). Ablation further reveals that adding architectural components leads to overfitting on limited training data, confirming that training objective improvement is more effective than architectural augmentation for degradation robustness.
Figures & tables
| Method | Prm | Cln | J70 | J50 | J30 | B1 | B2 | B3 | R.5 | R.25 | Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-Free ∗ [ 1 ] | ACC | 86.5M | 90.1 | 84.8 | 82.8 | 80.1 | 85.4 | 84.7 | 83.0 | 82.4 | 77.0 | 82.5 |
| AUC | 98.7 | 97.4 | 96.3 | 94.8 | 98.5 | 97.7 | 95.5 | 98.0 | 92.9 | 96.4 | ||
| Baseline | ACC | 197K | 86.2 | 56.8 | 53.3 | 52.3 | 85.3 | 77.2 | 52.3 | 77.0 | 57.7 | 64.0 |
| AUC | 89.1 | 79.8 | 77.7 | 75.3 | 88.0 | 84.7 | 70.1 | 84.2 | 68.1 | 78.5 | ||
| DCPT | ACC | 197K | 85.3 | 72.5 | 71.2 | 69.5 | 84.4 | 78.8 | 59.9 | 80.8 | 68.0 | 73.1 |
| AUC | 87.9 | 80.5 | 79.4 | 77.6 | 87.1 | 84.0 | 71.2 | 83.8 | 71.4 | 79.4 |
| Variant | Clean | J70 | J50 | J30 | JPEG Avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 0 | 0 | 86.2 | 56.8 | 53.3 | 52.3 | 54.1 |
| only | 0.5 | 0 | 84.6 | 71.7 | 71.4 | 69.0 | 70.7 |
| only | 0 | 0.1 | 84.8 | 74.7 | 72.9 | 71.0 | 72.9 |
| DCPT (both) | 0.5 | 0.1 | 85.3 | 72.5 | 71.2 | 69.5 | 71.1 |
| + SRM (1.6M) | 0.5 | 0.1 | 78.1 | 50.7 | 56.4 | 65.8 | 57.6 |
AI-Generated Image Detection
AI-generated image detection identifies synthetic or AI-edited images and develops methods that generalize across generators, domains, and image transformations.
See all 194 papers