Toward Accountable AI-Generated Content on Social Platforms: Steganographic Attribution and Multimodal Harm Detection
Organizations: Kean University, Union, NJ 07083 USA · North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102 USA · McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada · the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA ·
Abstract
The rapid growth of generative AI has introduced new challenges in content moderation and digital forensics. In particular, benign AI-generated images can be paired with harmful or misleading text, creating difficult-to-detect misuse. This contextual misuse undermines the traditional moderation framework and complicates attribution, as synthetic images typically lack persistent metadata or device signatures. We introduce a steganography enabled attribution framework that embeds cryptographically signed identifiers into images at creation time and uses multimodal harmful content detection as a trigger for attribution verification. Our system evaluates five watermarking methods across spatial, frequency, and wavelet domains. It also integrates a CLIP-based fusion model for multimodal harmful-content detection. Experiments demonstrate that spread-spectrum watermarking, especially in the wavelet domain, provides strong robustness under blur distortions, and our multimodal fusion detector achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.99, enabling reliable cross-modal attribution verification. These components form an end-to-end forensic pipeline that enables reliable tracing of harmful deployments of AI-generated imagery, supporting accountability in modern synthetic media environments. Our code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/bli1/steganography
Figures & tables
| Method | Total | Gaussian Blur | JPEG Compression (Q=50) | Resize | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success | Failure | Success | Failure | Success | Failure | |||||||||||
| Avg | Std | Rate(%) | Avg | Std | Avg | Std | Rate(%) | Avg | Std | Avg | Std | Rate(%) | Avg | Std | ||
| LSB | 1100 | 1100.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1100.0 | 0.0 | 1100.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| DCT | 1100 | 779.7 | 2.5 | 70.9 | 320.3 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1100.0 | 0.0 | 784.1 | 5.3 | 71.3 | 315.9 | 5.3 |
| DWT | 1100 | 795.0 | 3.2 | 72.3 | 305.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1100.0 | 0.0 | 793.8 | 3.6 | 72.2 | 306.2 | 3.6 |
| Spatial SS | 1100 | 1086.8 | 1.7 | 98.8 | 13.2 | 1.7 | 1065.0 | 1.8 | 96.8 | 35.0 | 1.8 | 1085.8 | 3.5 | 98.7 | 14.2 | 3.5 |
Digital Image Forensics
Digital image forensics develops methods to detect, localize, explain, and trace image manipulation, synthetic content, and hidden data.
See all 112 papers