This paper reviews the LoViF 2026 Challenge on Human-oriented Semantic Image Quality Assessment. This challenge aims to raise a new direction, i.e., how to evaluate the loss of semantic information from the human perspective, intending to promote the development of some new directions, like semantic coding, processing, and semantic-oriented optimization, etc. Unlike existing datasets of quality assessment, we form a dataset of human-oriented semantic quality assessment, termed the SeIQA dataset. This dataset is divided into three parts for this competition: (i) training data: 510 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground truth references; (ii) validation data: 80 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground-truth references; (iii) testing data: 160 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground-truth references. The primary objective of this challenge is to establish a new and powerful benchmark for human-oriented semantic image quality assessment. There are a total of 58 teams registered in this competition, and 6 teams submitted valid solutions and fact sheets for the final testing phase. These submissions achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the SeIQA dataset.
Figures & tables
Team
Leader
Final Score ↑
PLCC ↑
SROCC ↑
Runtime per images(s) ↓
GPU
Extra Data
Rank
RedpanQA Alliance
Weixia Zhang
0.8724
0.8764
0.8697
12.0
✓
✓
1
Ayush Gupta
Ayush Gupta
0.8711
0.8763
0.8677
5.0
✓
✓
2
RuntimeTerror
Rachit Agarwal
0.8693
0.8710
0.8681
1.0
✓
⊗
3
QA-FTE
Kanglong Fan
0.8560
0.8584
0.8544
12.0
✓
✓
4
DSS-SQA
Jiajun Wang
0.8469
0.8418
0.8503
0.22
✓
✓
5
cythdg
Banghao Yin
0.8243
0.8324
0.8189
0.57
✓
⊗
6
Table 1: Quantitative results of the LoViF 2026 The First Challenge on Human-oriented Semantic Quality Assessment. The best and second-best values per column are highlighted in red and blue , respectively. ”Params.” and ”GFlops” are reported from the teams’ factsheets. A checkmark ( ✓ ) indicates the use of ensembles or extra data, while a cross ( ⊗ ) indicates otherwise.
Figure 1: System diagram of Team Redpan QA Alliance
Figure 2: System diagram of Team Ayush Gupta
Figure 3: The pipeline of the method proposed by Team BUU_CV
Figure 4: The main structure of Team DSS-SQA
Figure 5: Pipeline of the method proposed by Team cythdg
In this paper, we present an overview of the NTIRE 2026 challenge on the 3rd Restore Any Image Model in the Wild, specifically focusing on Track 1: Professional Image Quality Assessment. Conventional Image Quality Assessment (IQA) typically relies on scalar scores. By compressing complex visual characteristics into a single number, these methods fundamentally struggle to distinguish subtle differences among uniformly high-quality images. Furthermore, they fail to articulate why one image is superior, lacking the reasoning capabilities required to provide guidance for vision tasks. To bridge this gap, recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a promising paradigm. Inspired by this potential, our challenge establishes a novel benchmark exploring the ability of MLLMs to mimic human expert cognition in evaluating high-quality image pairs. Participants were tasked with overcoming critical bottlenecks in professional scenarios, centering on two primary objectives: (1) Comparative Quality Selection: reliably identifying the visually superior image within a high-quality pair; and (2) Interpretative Reasoning: generating grounded, expert-level explanations that detail the rationale behind the selection. In total, the challenge attracted nearly 200 registrations and over 2,500 submissions. The top-performing methods significantly advanced the state of the art in professional IQA. The challenge dataset is available at https://github.com/narthchin/RAIM-PIQA, and the official homepage is accessible at https://www.codabench.org/competitions/12789/.
Low-level image processing has long been evaluated mainly from the perspective of visual fidelity. However, with the rise of deep learning and generative models, processed images may preserve perceptual quality while altering semantic content, making conventional Image Quality Assessment (IQA) insufficient for semantic-level assessment. In this paper, we formalize Semantic Similarity as a new evaluation task for low-level image processing, aimed at measuring whether semantic content is preserved after processing. We further present a structured formulation of image semantics based on semantic entities and their relations, and discuss the desired properties and constraints of a valid semantic similarity index. Based on this formulation, we propose Triplet-based Semantic Similarity Score (T3S), which models image semantics through foreground entities, background entities, and relations. T3S combines semantic entity extraction, foreground-background disentanglement, and open-world class/relation modeling. Experiments on COCO and SPA-Data show that T3S consistently outperforms existing fidelity-oriented metrics and representative semantic-level baselines, while better reflecting progressive semantic changes under diverse degradations. These results highlight the importance of semantic assessment in modern low-level vision.
Runjie Wang, Weiling Chen, Tiesong Zhao +1
Fuzhou University Fuzhou, Fujian, China · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong, China
This paper proposes a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for scientific image quality assessment, designed to simultaneously address both the understanding track (SIQA-U) and the scoring track (SIQA-S) of the SIQA challenge. We construct a multimodal index that integrates textual semantics with fine-grained visual features, and develop a multi-route retrieval and fusion mechanism to provide large language models with highly relevant reference cases, thereby enhancing their capability to evaluate complex scientific images. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively aligns with the judgment criteria of human experts. Ultimately, our method achieves 1st place in the SIQA-U track of the SIQA challenge at the ICME 2026 Grand Challenges.
Yinuo Zhang, Bingshuo Liu, Zhiying Tu +6
Harbin Institute of Technology · Tencent · Nanyang Technological University