This paper reviews the LoViF 2026 Challenge on Human-oriented Semantic Image Quality Assessment. This challenge aims to raise a new direction, i.e., how to evaluate the loss of semantic information from the human perspective, intending to promote the development of some new directions, like semantic coding, processing, and semantic-oriented optimization, etc. Unlike existing datasets of quality assessment, we form a dataset of human-oriented semantic quality assessment, termed the SeIQA dataset. This dataset is divided into three parts for this competition: (i) training data: 510 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground truth references; (ii) validation data: 80 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground-truth references; (iii) testing data: 160 pairs of degraded images and their corresponding ground-truth references. The primary objective of this challenge is to establish a new and powerful benchmark for human-oriented semantic image quality assessment. There are a total of 58 teams registered in this competition, and 6 teams submitted valid solutions and fact sheets for the final testing phase. These submissions achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the SeIQA dataset.
Figures & tables
Team
Leader
Final Score ↑
PLCC ↑
SROCC ↑
Runtime per images(s) ↓
GPU
Extra Data
Rank
RedpanQA Alliance
Weixia Zhang
0.8724
0.8764
0.8697
12.0
✓
✓
1
Ayush Gupta
Ayush Gupta
0.8711
0.8763
0.8677
5.0
✓
✓
2
RuntimeTerror
Rachit Agarwal
0.8693
0.8710
0.8681
1.0
✓
⊗
3
QA-FTE
Kanglong Fan
0.8560
0.8584
0.8544
12.0
✓
✓
4
DSS-SQA
Jiajun Wang
0.8469
0.8418
0.8503
0.22
✓
✓
5
cythdg
Banghao Yin
0.8243
0.8324
0.8189
0.57
✓
⊗
6
Table 1: Quantitative results of the LoViF 2026 The First Challenge on Human-oriented Semantic Quality Assessment. The best and second-best values per column are highlighted in red and blue , respectively. ”Params.” and ”GFlops” are reported from the teams’ factsheets. A checkmark ( ✓ ) indicates the use of ensembles or extra data, while a cross ( ⊗ ) indicates otherwise.
Figure 1: System diagram of Team Redpan QA Alliance
Figure 2: System diagram of Team Ayush Gupta
Figure 3: The pipeline of the method proposed by Team BUU_CV
Figure 4: The main structure of Team DSS-SQA
Figure 5: Pipeline of the method proposed by Team cythdg