RECIPER: A Dual-View Retrieval Pipeline for Procedure-Oriented Materials Question Answering

Materials process optimization requires reasoning over routes, conditions, tools and causal dependencies, yet most computational formulations flatten synthesis procedures into text or ordered steps. We introduce MatProcBench, a provenance-grounded benchmark constructed from literature-mined MatPROV graphs, to evaluate seven process-reasoning tasks spanning route continuity, step-level variable inference and global causal consistency under both same-split and shift-aware evaluation, including a strict dual-OOD split that combines temporal and material-class shift. We further introduce ProvMind, a process-memory reasoning framework that retrieves analogous training processes, converts them into provenance-aware option-level compatibility scores, and uses a language model for constrained final decision making. ProvMind achieves 52.84% accuracy on the dual-OOD split, outperforming prompting, retrieval-augmented and supervised fine-tuning baselines.

While retrieval-augmented language models increasingly serve as literature assistants in the physical sciences, existing benchmarks evaluate them primarily on qualitative text overlap or through model-based scoring rather than against verified experimental ground truth. In experimental materials disciplines such as perovskite photovoltaics, however, the most critical inquiries are inherently quantitative and aggregate measurements across dozens or hundreds of papers. Here, we present a quantitative question-answering benchmark where all 755 ground-truth answers are computed directly from 45,441 measured device records (40,889 human-curated records through 2021 and 4,552 records extracted from 2022-2026 literature). Benchmarking six retrieval architectures over 158,274 passages from 25,662 papers using an open 14B model on a single 24 GB GPU, standard passage retrieval tops out at 16-23% accuracy (compared to 1.6-6.5% zero-shot). In contrast, equipping the language model with read-only SQL execution over the structured device table elevates accuracy to 51.5% on historical and 50.8% on prospective literature -- a 33.01.8 percentage-point advantage over hybrid text retrieval. Aggregate queries spanning extrema, distributions, and filtered record counts prove virtually unsolvable via text retrieval alone, demonstrating that systematic table extraction is an operational prerequisite for literature-scale quantitative inquiry.

We describe tus-nlp's Lit3R (Retrieve-Relate-Read) system for LitTraceQA, a shared task for literature-grounded question answering that requires systems to retrieve relevant papers, identify supporting evidence, and generate answers. Lit3R combines off-the-shelf retrieval, reranking, and large language model (LLM) components without task-specific training. The retriever iteratively combines BM25-based sparse and dense retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, and LLM-based verification, and complements retrieval based on the question with paper-to-paper expansion. The reader first identifies supporting evidence within individual papers and then synthesizes evidence across papers to produce the final answer and evidence trace. On the official test set, our system ranked 4th on the leaderboard. Our code is available at https://github.com/tus-ist-nlp/littraceqa.