DA-PTQ: Drift-Aware Post-Training Quantization for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models
Organizations: Tongji University Shanghai, China · University of Technology Sydney Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have demonstrated strong potential for embodied AI, yet their deployment on resource-limited robots remains challenging due to high memory and computational demands. While Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) provides an efficient solution, directly applying PTQ to VLAs often results in severe performance degradation during sequential control. We identify temporal error accumulation as a key factor, where quantization perturbations at the vision-language-to-action interface are progressively amplified, leading to kinematic drift in executed trajectories. To address this issue, we propose Drift-Aware Post-Training Quantization (DA-PTQ), which formulates quantization as a drift-aware optimization problem over sequential decision processes. DA-PTQ consists of two components: (1) Cross-Space Representation Compensation, which mitigates structured distortions between multimodal representations and action space to improve action consistency, and (2) Motion-Driven Mixed-Precision Allocation, which assigns bit-widths by minimizing trajectory-level motion errors. Extensive experiments show that DA-PTQ significantly reduces kinematic drift and achieves comparable performance to full-precision models under low-bit settings, enabling practical deployment of VLAs on resource-limited robotic platforms.
Figures & tables
| Method | Sources | Success Rate ( ) | Memory Reduction ( ) | Speedup ( ) |
| VLA-Cache | NeurIPS’25 | 46.8 | 0.0 | 36.7 |
| QuantVLA | CVPR’26 | 43.5 | 42.7 | 55.8 |
| Ours | — | 48.9 | 42.5 | 54.8 |
| WidowX Robot | Methods | Sources | Tasks | Average Success Rate ( ) | |||
| Put Spoon on Towel | Put Carrot on Plate | Stack Green Block on Yellow Block | Put Eggplant in Yellow Basket | ||||
| SIMPLER (Visual Matching) | CogACT (FP) | Arxiv’24 | 71.7 | 50.8 | 15.0 | 67.5 | 51.3 |
| VLA-Cache | NeurIPS’25 | 78.3 | 39.1 | 17.4 | 52.2 | 46.8 | |
| QuantVLA | CVPR’26 | 47.8 | 39.1 | 17.4 | 69.6 | 43.5 | |
| Ours | — | 65.2 | 52.2 | 17.4 | 60.9 | 48.9 | |
| Google Robot | Methods | Sources | Tasks | Average Success Rate ( ) | |||
| Pick Coke Can | Move Near | Open/Close Drawer | Open Top Drawer and Place Apple | ||||
| SIMPLER (Visual Matching) | CogACT (FP) | Arxiv’24 | 91.3 | 85.0 | 71.8 | 50.9 | 74.8 |
| VLA-Cache | NeurIPS’25 | 92.0 | 83.3 | 70.5 | 51.6 | 74.4 | |
| QuantVLA | CVPR’26 | 87.6 | 81.7 | 55.1 | 38.0 | 65.6 | |
| Ours | — | 92.4 | 87.9 | 58.3 | 35.2 | 68.5 | |
| SIMPLER (Variant Aggregation) | CogACT (FP) | Arxiv’24 | 89.6 | 80.8 | 28.3 | 46.6 | 61.3 |
| WidowX Robot | Variants | Tasks | Average Success Rate ( ) | Memory Reduction ( ) | Speedup ( ) | |||
| Put Spoon on Towel | Put Carrot on Plate | Stack Green Block on Yellow Block | Put Eggplant in Yellow Basket | |||||
| SIMPLER (Visual Matching) | CogACT (FP) | 71.7 | 50.8 | 15.0 | 67.5 | — | — | — |
| + W4A8 + CSRC | 66.7 | 41.7 | 12.5 | 54.2 | 43.8 | 42.6 | 55.2 | |
| + W4A8 + DA-MPA | 50.0 | 45.8 | 12.5 | 50.0 | 39.6 | 42.9 | 54.8 | |
| + W4A8 + DA-PTQ | 65.2 | 52.2 | 17.4 | 60.9 | 48.9 | 42.5 | 54.8 | |
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Module | Parameter | Value |
| Calibration | Calibration Steps | |
| Batch Size | ||
| Spatial Bins | ||
| Warmup Steps | ||
| DA-MPA | Probe Steps | |
| Damping Factor ( ) |