Self-Monitoring Benefits from Structural Integration: Lessons from Metacognition in Continuous-Time Multi-Timescale Agents

When an RL agent's observations are gradually corrupted, at what drift rate does it "wake up" -- and what determines this boundary? We study world model-based self-monitoring under continuous observation drift across four MuJoCo environments, three detector families (z-score, variance, percentile), and three model capacities. We find that (1) a sharp detection threshold $\varepsilon^*$ exists universally: below it, drift is absorbed as normal variation; above it, detection occurs rapidly. The threshold's existence and sigmoid shape are invariant across all detector families and model capacities, though its position depends on the interaction between detector sensitivity, noise floor structure, and environment dynamics. (2) Sinusoidal drift is completely undetectable by all detector families -- including variance and percentile detectors with no temporal smoothing -- establishing this as a world model property rather than a detector artifact. (3) Within each environment, $\varepsilon^*$ follows a power law in detector parameters ($R^2 = 0.89$-$0.97$), but cross-environment prediction fails ($R^2 = 0.45$), revealing that the missing variable is environment-specific dynamics structure $\partial \mathrm{PE}/\partial\varepsilon$. (4) In fragile environments, agents collapse before any detector can fire ("collapse before awareness"), creating a fundamentally unmonitorable failure mode. Our results reframe $\varepsilon^*$ from an emergent world model property to a three-way interaction between noise floor, detector, and environment dynamics, providing a more defensible and empirically grounded account of self-monitoring boundaries in RL agents.

Reinforcement learning is commonly used to train language agents in interactive environments, but cannot be directly applied when rewards are unavailable. Recent methods use environmental feedback as privileged context for hindsight self-distillation, but our analysis suggests that simply conditioning the teacher on feedback is insufficient, motivating us to rethink how environmental feedback is used in agentic self-distillation. Given that environmental feedback contains rich supervision for modeling how the environment responds to agent actions, we introduce agentic SElf-distilLation with environmental Feedback modeling (SELF), a framework that jointly optimizes environmental feedback modeling and hindsight self-distillation. SELF learns to predict environmental responses while distilling guidance from a feedback-conditioned self-teacher into the policy. Our analysis reveals a mutually reinforcing mechanism: environmental feedback modeling strengthens hindsight supervision and policy learning, while self-distillation enhances the model's ability to model environmental feedback. With Qwen3-8B, SELF outperforms SDPO and GRPO by 6.4 and 4.1 percentage points in $τ$-bench success rate, and by 10.71 and 3.57 percentage points in AppWorld task goal completion, respectively. These results show that SELF uses environmental feedback more effectively within agentic self-distillation, improving agent capabilities.

Runtime monitors for autonomous agents commonly threshold an accumulated internal state - a behavioural baseline, a drift statistic, or, in our prior work, a modelled affective state. We previously reported a State Saturation Trap: threshold-on-state triggers over a continuous affect engine become near-constant alarms on SWE-bench debugging agents (Modgil 2026). A post-release audit found the engine received dt=0 between actions, so its exponential decay never operated: the published trap is a pure-accumulator result. We correct the record (erratum, v2) and treat the flaw as an experiment. The key variable it exposes is whether a monitor's dynamics are calibrated in sample time (per observation, as in CUSUM) or wall-clock time (half-lives in seconds, as in affect models and EMA baselines). On fixed-rate streams these coincide; on agent streams, where inter-action time varies by orders of magnitude, they do not. A pre-registered sweep over uniform intervals (dt in {0..600}s) on 20 trajectories shows the wall-clock level trigger has two regimes: at dt<=1s a constant alarm (20/20; median 18 firings); at dt>=60s silent. Every critical dt lies in (1,30]s. A scriptable gpt-5.4-mini agent loop measures latency at median 1.53s (p90 2.33s), inside the trap regime, vindicating the empirical finding under a corrected mechanism. The structure is a property of the calibration class, not the engine: a minimal wall-clock accumulator over the raw error stream reproduces the same cliff, while a sample-time CUSUM over the identical stream is exactly dt-invariant (20/20). A rising-edge trigger with hysteresis fires 0-3 times per trajectory in every condition. We conclude that wall-clock-calibrated leaky-integrator monitors admit no regime in which they act as moment detectors on agent streams; transition detection escapes the trap at every cadence, but does not recover human intervention timing.