Multi-Head Residual-Gated DeepONet for Coherent Nonlinear Wave Dynamics
Organizations: School of Engineering, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom · School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 200031, China
Abstract
Coherent nonlinear wave dynamics are often strongly shaped by a compact set of physically meaningful descriptors of the initial state. Traditional neural operators typically treat the input-output mapping as a largely black-box high-dimensional regression problem, without explicitly exploiting this structured physical context. Common feature-integration strategies usually rely on direct concatenation or FiLM-style affine modulation in hidden latent spaces. Here we introduce a different paradigm, loosely inspired by the complementary roles of state evolution and physically meaningful observables in quantum mechanics: the wave field is learned through a standard DeepONet state pathway, while compact physical descriptors follow a parallel conditioning pathway and act as residual modulation factors on the state prediction. Based on this idea, we develop a Multi-Head Residual-Gated DeepONet (MH-RG), which combines a pre-branch residual modulator, a branch residual gate, and a trunk residual gate with a low-rank multi-head mechanism to capture multiple complementary conditioned response patterns without prohibitive parameter growth. We evaluate the framework on representative benchmarks including highly nonlinear conservative wave dynamics and dissipative trapped dynamics and further perform detailed mechanistic analyses of the learned multi-head gating behavior. Compared with feature-augmented baselines, MH-RG DeepONet achieves consistently lower error while better preserving phase coherence and the fidelity of physically relevant dynamical quantities.
Figures & tables
| Model | Branch | Trunk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | |||
| Concat | |||
| FiLM | |||
| RG | |||
| MH-RG ( heads) |
| (a) Full-field reconstruction | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model | Params (M) | Full-field MSE |
| Vanilla | 1.447 | |
| Concat | 1.450 | |
| FiLM | 1.846 | |
| OFormer adaptation | 1.496 | |
| RG | 1.587 | |
| Control configuration | Conditioning structure or context | Full-field MSE |
| (a) Complete ablation of conditioning placement | ||
| All three conditioning pathways disabled | ||
| Branch-side residual conditioning only | ||
| Trunk-side residual conditioning only | ||
| Branch- and trunk-side residual conditioning | ||
| Pre-branch modulation only | ||
| (a) Pre-branch gate sweep with | |
|---|---|
| Full-field MSE | |
| 0.5 | |
| 1.0 | |
| 1.5 | |
| (b) Latent gate sweep with and | |
| Full-field MSE | |
| Model | Params (M) | Full-field MSE |
|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | 8.719 | |
| Concat | 8.722 | |
| FiLM | 8.921 | |
| RG | 8.854 | |
| MH-RG ( ) | 8.829 | |
| MH-RG ( ) | 8.837 |
Deep Operator Networks
Deep Operator Networks learn mappings between functions, enabling fast surrogates for parameterized differential equations and other complex systems.
See all 49 papers