Organizations: School of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University, Shenzhen, China · Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China · School of Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, China · Pengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
Regarded as the third generation of neural networks, Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have garnered significant traction due to their biological plausibility and energy efficiency. Recent advancements in large models necessitate spiking neurons capable of high performance, adaptability, and training efficiency. In this work, we first propose a novel functional perspective that provides general guidance for designing the new generation of spiking neurons. Following the insightful guidelines, we propose the Adaptive Spiking Neuron (ASN), which incorporates trainable parameters to learn membrane potential dynamics and enable adaptive firing. ASN adopts an integer training and spike inference paradigm, facilitating efficient SNN training. To further enhance robustness, we propose a specialized variant of ASN, the Normalized Adaptive Spiking Neuron (NASN), which integrates normalization to stabilize training. We evaluate our neuron model on 19 datasets spanning five distinct tasks in both vision and language modalities, demonstrating the effectiveness and versatility of the ASN family. Our ASN family is expected to become the new generation of general-purpose spiking neurons.
Figures & tables
Spiking Neurons
Efficient Training
Adaptive Firing
Architecture Compatibility
Spike-Driven Inference
LIF ( Gerstner et al., 2014 )
✗
✗
✓
✓
PLIF ( Fang et al., 2021 )
✗
✓
✓
✓
PSN ( Fang et al., 2023b )
❍
✓
✗
✓
ILIF ( Luo et al., 2024 )
✓
✗
✓
✓
NILIF ( Lei et al., 2025 )
✓
✗
✓
✓
ASN, NASN
✓
✓
✓
✓
Table 1. Comparison with other foundation spiking neurons in the SNN domain, including LIF ( Fang et al., 2022 ) , PLIF ( Fang et al., 2021 ) , PSN ( Fang et al., 2023b ) , ILIF ( Yao et al., 2023 ) , and NILIF ( Lei et al., 2025 ) . ❍ indicates that PSN is substantially faster than LIF and PLIF, while remaining notably slower than ILIF and NILIF in training. Our ASN family (including ASN and NASN) satisfies the four characteristics: Efficient Training, Adaptive Firing, Architecture Compatibility, Spike-Driven Inference.
Figure 1. Overview of Adaptive Spiking Neuron(ASN). (a) schematics of a biological spiking neuron. (b) depicts a neuron lacking membrane potential adaptation, thereby suppressing the transmission of membrane potential information. (c) illustrates the proposed neuron, where a learnable shift parameter enables adaptive firing, thereby ensuring better membrane potential information transmission. From the perspective of spike dynamics at the neural level. (d) and (e) show the dynamics of LIF (spike training and spike inference) and ILIF (integer training and spike inference) neurons, respectively. Both employ fixed-interval clamping, resulting in significant membrane potential quantization bias. (f) shows the spike dynamics of our proposed ASN with adaptive firing, achieving more precise spike quantization of membrane potential.
Methods
Architecture
Param (M)
Train Size
Test Size
Time Step
E (mJ)
Top-1 Acc ( % )
SEW ResNet ( Fang et al., 2022 )
SEW-ResNet-34
21.79
224 2
224 2
4
-
67.04
MS-ResNet ( Hu et al., 2021 )
MS-ResNet-34
21.80
224 2
224 2
6
-
69.42
Spikformer ( Zhou et al., 2023b )
Spikformer-8-384
16.81
224 2
224 2
4
12.43
70.24
SD-Transformer ( Yao et al., 2023 )
SD-Transformer-8-384
16.81
224 2
224 2
4
3.90
72.28
LIF (Spikingformer) ( Zhou et al., 2026b )
Spikingformer-8-384
16.81
224 2
224 2
4
4.69
72.45
LIF (Spikingformer † ) ( Zhou et al., 2026b )
Spikingformer-8-384
16.81
224 2
224 2
4
5.61
74.35
Table 2. The results on ImageNet-1k classification. "E (mJ)" means "Energy Consumption (mJ)". Spikingformer † is the variant of Spikingformer with the improved downsampling ( Zhou et al., 2023a ) .
Method
CIFAR-10
CIFAR-100
Param
T
Acc
Param
T
Acc
Spikformer ( Zhou et al., 2023b )
5.76
4
94.80
5.76
4
76.95
Spikformer ( Zhou et al., 2023b )
9.32
4
95.51
9.32
4
78.21
SD-Transformer ( Yao et al., 2023 )
10.28
4
95.60
10.28
4
78.4
Spikingformer ( Zhou et al., 2026b )
9.32
4
95.81
9.32
4
79.21
Spikingformer † ( Zhou et al., 2026b )
9.32
4
95.95
9.32
4
80.37
Table 3. Comparision on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. "Param" denotes "Parameter (M)", "Acc" denotes "Top-1 Accuracy (%)", and " T " denotes "Time Step". Our model adopts the architecture of Spikingformer † .
Model
Time Step
MNLI
QQP
QNLI
SST-2
CoLA
STS-B
MRPC
RTE
Avg.
BERT base ( Devlin et al., 2019 )
–
83.4
71.2
90.5
93.5
52.1
85.8
88.9
66.4
79.6
Q2BERT ( Zhang et al., 2020 )
–
47.3
67.0
61.3
80.6
0.0
4.7
81.2
52.7
49.1
BERT 3L ( Devlin et al., 2019 )
–
77.1
85.2
85.8
88.1
31.7
85.7
86.4
66.4
75.9
SpikeLM ( Xing et al., 2024b )
4
77.2
83.9
85.3
87.0
38.8
84.9
85.7
69.0
76.5
LIF-BERT ( Xing et al., 2024b )
4
35.2
0
50.5
50.9
0
0
81.2
52.7
34.6
PSN-BERT ( Xing et al., 2024b )
4
35.2
0
50.5
50.9
0
6.8
81.2
52.7
34.7
Table 4. The results on the Natural Language Understanding task (GLUE datasets). "Avg." denotes "Average Accuracy (%)". The results of LIF-BERT and PSN-BERT are reported in Xing et al. (2024b) . Our model adopts the architecture of WE-SpikingFormer.
Model
E (mJ)
Time Step
ARC-e
ARC-c
BoolQ
HeadQA
OBQA
Avg.
Qwen-1.5B ( Yang et al., 2024 )
3398.3
-
26.2
26.9
60.3
25.7
27.1
33.2
NILIF (WD-SpikingFormer-0.4B) ( Zhou et al., 2026a )
238.4
4
30.0
22.3
37.8
26.0
26.1
28.4
Ours
245.1
4
35.3
20.6
37.9
25.9
27.2
29.4
Table 5. The results on Question Answering Tasks (QAT). "E (mJ)" means "Energy Consumption (mJ)". "Avg." denotes "Average Accuracy (%)". Our model adopts the architecture of WD-SpikingFormer-0.4B.
Model
E (mJ)
Time Step
HellaSwag
PIQA
WinoGrande
Avg.
SpikeLLM-7B ( Xing et al., 2024a )
-
4
33.9
53.4
51.5
46.3
Qwen-1.5B ( Yang et al., 2024 )
3398.3
-
26.5
53.7
52.8
44.3
NILIF (WD-SpikingFormer-0.4B) ( Zhou et al., 2026a )
238.4
4
25.9
53.4
50.2
43.2
Ours
245.1
4
26.0
54.6
49.4
43.3
Table 6. The results on Commonsense Reasoning Tasks (CRT). "E (mJ)" means "Energy Consumption (mJ)". "Avg." denotes "Average Accuracy (%)" . Our model adopts the architecture of WD-SpikingFormer-0.4B.
Figure 2. Our model (WD-SpikingFormer with NASN) on parameter scaling and pretraining data scaling. (a) and (b) show increasing model parameters for pretraining on Question-Answering Tasks (QAT) and Commonsense Reasoning Tasks (CRT). (c) and (d) show increasing tokens for model pretraining on the above two Tasks.
Neuron model
CIFAR-100 ( % )
LIF ( Zhou et al., 2026b )
80.22
PLIF ( Fang et al., 2021 )
80.25
PSN ( Fang et al., 2023b )
77.84
ILIF ( Luo et al., 2024 )
80.32
ASN (Ours)
80.36
NILIF ( Lei et al., 2025 )
80.98
Table 7. Ablation study for Spiking Neurons on CIFAR-100. Base model adopts the architecture of Spikingformer † ( Zhou et al., 2026b ) .
Figure 3. Neuron comparison on scaling. The base model is WD-SpikingFormer. (a) and (b) show the neuron comparison with the setting of 0.4B param with 0.1B Tokens on Question-Answering Tasks (QAT) and Commonsense Reasoning Tasks (CRT). (c) and (d) show the neuron comparison with the setting of 1.0B param with 0.5B Tokens on the above two Tasks.
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are promising for energy-efficient, real-time edge computing, yet their performance is often constrained by the limited adaptability of conventional leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons. Existing LIF models struggle with restricted information capacity and susceptibility to noise, leading to degraded accuracy and compromised robustness. Inspired by the dynamic self-regulation of biological potassium channels, we propose the Potassium-regulated LIF (KvLIF) neuron model. KvLIF introduces an auxiliary conductance state that integrates membrane potential and spiking history to adaptively modulate neuronal excitability and reset dynamics. This design extends the dynamic response range of neurons to varying input intensities and effectively suppresses noise-induced spikes. We extensively evaluate KvLIF on both static image and neuromorphic datasets, demonstrating consistent improvements in classification accuracy and superior robustness compared to existing LIF models. Our work bridges biological plausibility with computational efficiency, offering a neuron model that enhances SNN performance while maintaining suitability for low-power neuromorphic deployment.
Zhuobin Yang, Yeyao Bao, Liangfu Lv +3
Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Spiking neural networks promise brain-inspired neural dynamics, yet native large-scale spiking language-model pretraining remains largely unexplored relative to conversion, distillation, and backbone-adaptation approaches. We diagnose a central obstacle: standard spiking neurons apply the same firing sensitivity to every token, creating dense- or silent-firing regimes that are difficult to resolve with globally tuned parameters alone. This problem is particularly acute in language modeling, where a single sequence contains tokens of vastly different informational roles, making a uniform firing regime poorly matched to the data. We address this with NeuronSpark, a self-attention-free language model built around input-dependent spiking membrane dynamics, where each neuron's decay rate, gain, and firing threshold adapt to the current token content. Together with gated associative memory and adaptive temporal aggregation, this selectivity enables billion-scale pretraining from random initialization without backbone transfer, conversion, or distillation. We relate the neuron to fixed-parameter spiking models and the memory to linear attention. At 1.1B parameters and 2.1B tokens, NeuronSpark reaches a 40.0 eight-task zero-shot average, exceeds comparable-budget Pythia/Mamba checkpoints, retains 95.2%/93.2% of their fully trained scores, and spontaneously develops a fast--slow hierarchy. At 2,048 tokens, parameter-matched VHDL points reduce operation-energy proxy by 90.1%/67.0% and cycles by 94.1%/80.3% versus Transformer/Mamba; a physical FPGA path reaches 24.000s TTFT and 0.082440 TPS.
Training deep spiking neural networks (SNNs) remains challenging due to sharp loss landscapes and temporal inconsistency caused by surrogate gradients. To address these challenges, we propose a unified framework: adaptive and asymmetric surrogate gradients A2SG. The adaptive gradients adjust an effective window for spatio-temporal adaptation, reducing spatial gradient variation and maintaining directional consistency of gradients over time. The asymmetric gradients reflect neuronal dynamics by assigning larger gradients to neurons with higher membrane potentials, and we prove that they yield lower variation than symmetric surrogates. Our analysis further establishes a direct connection between local gradient variation and the curvature of the loss landscape, providing a principled explanation for how A2SG promotes convergence to flatter minima and improves generalization. We conduct extensive experiments on diverse models, including CNN-based and Transformer-based SNNs, across various tasks such as image classification using both static and neuromorphic datasets, as well as segmentation. The results demonstrate that A2SG consistently improves accuracy and energy efficiency, establishing it as a general and reliable solution for training deep SNNs. Our code is available at https://github.com/KIST-NCL/A2SG.git.
Yechan Kang, Yongjin Kweon, Mingyeong Seo +8
Center for Semiconductor Technology, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea · LIG Defense&Aerospace, Seongnam, Republic of Korea +1