Euler-inspired Decoupling Neural Operator for Efficient Pansharpening
Organizations: School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Post and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China
Abstract
Pansharpening aims to synthesize high-resolution multispectral (HR-MS) images by fusing the spatial textures of panchromatic (PAN) images with the spectral information of low-resolution multispectral (LR-MS) images. While recent deep learning paradigms, especially diffusion-based operators, have pushed the performance boundaries, they often encounter spectral-spatial blurring and prohibitive computational costs due to their stochastic nature and iterative sampling. In this paper, we propose the Euler-inspired Decoupling Neural Operator (EDNO), a physics-inspired framework that redefines pansharpening as a continuous functional mapping in the frequency domain. Departing from conventional Cartesian feature processing, our EDNO leverages Euler's formula to transform features into a polar coordinate system, enabling a novel explicit-implicit interaction mechanism. Specifically, we develop the Euler Feature Interaction Layer (EFIL), which decouples the fusion task into two specialized modules: 1) Explicit Feature Interaction Module, utilizing a linear weighting scheme to simulate phase rotation for adaptive geometric alignment; and 2) Implicit Feature Interaction Module, employing a feed-forward network to model spectral distributions for superior color consistency. By operating in the frequency domain, EDNO inherently captures global receptive fields while maintaining discretization-invariance. Experimental results on the three datasets demonstrate that EDNO offers a superior efficiency-performance balance compared to heavyweight architectures.
Figures & tables
| Reduced-Resolution | Full-Resolution | |||||||||
| Method | Params (K) | FLOPs (G) | PSNR | SSIM | SAM | ERGAS | QNR | |||
| SFIM ( Liu, 2000 ) | - | - | 32.6334 | 0.8728 | 0.5159 | 0.0597 | 3.1919 | 0.0737 | 0.0899 | 0.8439 |
| Wavelet ( King and Wang, 2001 ) | - | - | 32.1992 | 0.8500 | 0.4577 | 0.0638 | 3.3799 | 0.0968 | 0.1020 | 0.8126 |
| IHS ( Faragallah, 2018 ) | - | - | 32.8250 | 0.8775 | 0.5305 | 0.0637 | 3.0585 | 0.0874 | 0.1187 | 0.8053 |
| GPPNN ( Xu et al., 2021 ) | 119.8 | 11.2 | 40.5086 | 0.9698 | 0.8009 | 0.0275 | 1.2060 | 0.0670 | 0.0785 | 0.8607 |
| CTINN ( Zhou et al., 2022a ) | 378.2 | 13.3 | 41.2019 | 0.9735 | 0.8149 | 0.0246 | 1.0879 | 0.0658 | 0.0776 | 0.8632 |
| Reduced-Resolution | Full-Resolution | |||||||||
| Method | Params (K) | FLOPs (G) | PSNR | SSIM | SAM | ERGAS | QNR | |||
| SFIM ( Liu, 2000 ) | - | - | 34.7715 | 0.8572 | 0.4584 | 0.0657 | 4.2073 | 0.0737 | 0.0899 | 0.8439 |
| Wavelet ( King and Wang, 2001 ) | - | - | 33.9208 | 0.8197 | 0.4033 | 0.0695 | 4.6445 | 0.0968 | 0.1020 | 0.8126 |
| IHS ( Faragallah, 2018 ) | - | - | 35.2315 | 0.8837 | 0.5217 | 0.0661 | 3.9912 | 0.0874 | 0.1187 | 0.8053 |
| GPPNN ( Xu et al., 2021 ) | 119.8 | 11.2 | 43.5980 | 0.9764 | 0.8663 | 0.0326 | 1.5218 | 0.0670 | 0.0785 | 0.8607 |
| CTINN ( Zhou et al., 2022a ) | 378.2 | 13.3 | 44.3181 | 0.9788 | 0.8719 | 0.0291 | 1.4050 | 0.0699 | 0.1561 | 0.7841 |
| PSNR | SSIM | ERGAS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 41.1870 | 0.9724 | 0.8157 | 1.0925 | 0.0771 |
| 3 | 41.4968 | 0.9738 | 0.8218 | 1.0472 | 0.0775 |
| 4 | 41.6488 | 0.9747 | 0.8262 | 1.0259 | 0.0768 |
| 5 | 41.4173 | 0.9733 | 0.8217 | 1.0527 | 0.0790 |
| Config | PSNR | SSIM | ERGAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (I) | 38.7992 | 0.9552 | 0.7607 | 1.4415 | 0.0810 |
| (II) | 38.9401 | 0.9551 | 0.7580 | 1.4080 | 0.0822 |
| (III) | 37.4784 | 0.9434 | 0.7145 | 1.6593 | 0.0874 |
| (IV) | 41.2360 | 0.9724 | 0.8150 | 1.0785 | 0.0789 |
| ours | 41.6488 | 0.9747 | 0.8262 | 1.0259 | 0.0768 |