AffectAgent: Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Emotion Recognition
Authors: Zeheng Wang, Zitong Yu, Yijie Zhu, Bo Zhao, Haochen Liang, Taorui Wang, Wei Xia, Jiayu Zhang, +4 more
Organizations: Guangdong Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy (SZ), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China · Great Bay University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China · Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing & Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Media Security, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
LLM-based multimodal emotion recognition relies on static parametric memory and often hallucinates when interpreting nuanced affective states. In this paper, given that single-round retrieval-augmented generation is highly susceptible to modal ambiguity and therefore struggles to capture complex affective dependencies across modalities, we introduce AffectAgent, an affect-oriented multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation framework that leverages collaborative decision-making among agents for fine-grained affective understanding. Specifically, AffectAgent comprises three jointly optimized specialized agents, namely a query planner, an evidence filter, and an emotion generator, which collaboratively perform analytical reasoning to retrieve cross-modal samples, assess evidence, and generate predictions. These agents are optimized end-to-end using Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) with a shared affective reward to ensure consistent emotion understanding. Furthermore, we introduce Modality-Balancing Mixture of Experts (MB-MoE) and Retrieval-Augmented Adaptive Fusion (RAAF), where MB-MoE dynamically regulates the contributions of different modalities to mitigate representation mismatch caused by cross-modal heterogeneity, while RAAF enhances semantic completion under missing-modality conditions by incorporating retrieved audiovisual embeddings. Extensive experiments on MER-UniBench demonstrate that AffectAgent achieves superior performance across complex scenarios. Our code will be released at: https://github.com/Wz1h1NG/AffectAgent.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. (a) Vanilla LLMs ( Lian et al., 2025 ; Cheng et al., 2024a ) rely on static memory, struggling with nuanced emotion understanding. (b) Traditional RAG-enhanced models ( Pipoli et al., 2025 ; Wen et al., 2025 ) follow a linear retrieve-then-generate pipeline, which is inadequate for complex emotional reasoning. (c) Our AffectAgent adopts a collaborative multi-agent architecture that orchestrates query planning, retrieval, filtering, and generation for emotion recognition.
Figure 2. Overview of AffectAgent. AffectAgent performs multimodal emotion recognition through collaborative multi-agent reasoning, including affect-oriented query planning, evidence adjudication, and emotion generation. Meanwhile, RAAF and MB-MoE improve cross-modal fusion by recovering missing information and balancing modality contributions. Block diagram of AffectAgent. Multimodal inputs are processed by query-planning, evidence-adjudication, and emotion-generation agents, while RAAF recovers missing information and MB-MoE balances the contributions of available modalities.
Model
Modality
Basic
Sentiment
Fine-grained
Mean
A
V
T
MER2023
MER2024
MELD
IEMOCAP
MOSI
MOSEI
SIMS
SIMS v2
OV-MERD+
Video-LLaMA ( Zhang et al., 2023a )
✓
✓
✓
14.52
13.56
17.65
15.68
54.55
46.52
58.56
56.32
13.98
32.37
+ AffectAgent
22.75 ↑ 8.23
22.71 ↑ 9.15
24.07 ↑ 6.42
23.49 ↑ 7.81
58.90 ↑ 4.35
52.14 ↑ 5.62
61.70 ↑ 3.14
60.40 ↑ 4.08
22.65 ↑ 8.67
38.75 ↑ 6.38
VideoChat ( Li et al., 2025a )
✓
✓
✓
16.89
15.65
19.55
16.98
56.02
48.65
59.68
57.65
15.02
34.01
+ AffectAgent
24.30 ↑ 7.41
23.87 ↑ 8.22
25.38 ↑ 5.83
23.93 ↑ 6.95
61.14 ↑ 5.12
54.96 ↑ 6.31
63.93 ↑ 4.25
61.53 ↑ 3.88
22.36 ↑ 7.34
40.15 ↑ 6.14
ChatBridge ( Zhao et al., 2023 )
✓
✓
✓
18.06
16.89
20.35
25.02
56.66
49.68
58.62
56.55
15.35
35.24
Table 1. Results on MER-UniBench . For each dataset, we report its primary evaluation metric. The gray-shaded columns denote the primary ranking metrics, the best results are highlighted in bold, and the second-best results are underlined. Our AffectAgent consistently outperforms different baseline models.
Model
Modality
Basic
Sentiment
Fine-grained
Mean
A
V
T
MER2023
MER2024
MELD
IEMOCAP
MOSI
MOSEI
SIMS
SIMS v2
OV-MERD+
PandaGPT ( Su et al., 2023 )
✓
✓
×
28.15
32.40
26.50
31.20
55.30
52.10
54.20
50.50
25.40
39.53
+ AffectAgent
32.27 ↑ 4.12
35.95 ↑ 3.55
31.71 ↑ 5.21
36.03 ↑ 4.83
57.45 ↑ 2.15
54.94 ↑ 2.84
56.12 ↑ 1.92
52.91 ↑ 2.41
29.76 ↑ 4.36
43.01 ↑ 3.48
Emotion-LLaMA ( Cheng et al., 2024a )
✓
✓
×
45.20
56.80
35.40
42.10
56.50
58.20
65.30
64.10
40.50
51.57
+ AffectAgent
49.01 ↑ 3.81
58.94 ↑ 2.14
39.52 ↑ 4.12
45.66 ↑ 3.56
58.73 ↑ 2.23
60.65 ↑ 2.45
67.16 ↑ 1.86
66.02 ↑ 1.92
44.35 ↑ 3.85
54.44 ↑ 2.87
AffectGPT ( Lian et al., 2025 )
✓
✓
×
65.20
66.80
48.50
52.40
72.10
70.30
78.40
76.50
52.60
64.76
Table 2. Robustness evaluation under missing-modality settings. A , V , and T denote audio, video, and text, respectively. Results show that AffectAgent consistently improves performance across different backbone models under various missing-modality conditions.
Method
Basic
Sentiment
Fine-grained
Mean
MER2023
MER2024
MELD
IEMOCAP
MOSI
MOSEI
SIMS
SIMS v2
OV-MERD+
No RAG
78.54
78.80
55.65
60.54
81.30
80.90
88.49
86.18
62.52
74.77
Rewrite-Retrieve-Read ( Ma et al., 2023 )
78.39
78.76
55.58
60.42
81.36
80.83
88.52
86.13
62.47
74.72
BGM ( Ke et al., 2024 )
78.68
79.03
55.88
60.77
81.62
81.18
88.73
86.41
62.81
75.01
RAG-DDR ( Li et al., 2025b )
79.12
79.38
56.33
61.27
81.98
81.54
89.13
86.82
63.21
75.42
AffectAgent (Ours)
80.69 ↑ 2.15
80.66 ↑ 1.86
59.07 ↑ 3.42
63.39 ↑ 2.85
82.73 ↑ 1.43
82.67 ↑ 1.77
89.43 ↑ 0.94
87.33 ↑ 1.15
65.13 ↑ 2.61
76.78 ↑ 2.01
Table 3. Performance comparison of different RAG methods on emotion recognition datasets. To ensure a fair comparison, all RAG methods are applied to the same MLLM using full-modality inputs (audio, video, and text). Our proposed AffectAgent consistently outperforms existing RAG baselines across all datasets.
Figure 3. Illustration of three representative case studies, showing smooth success, query deviation with a correct final prediction, and query deviation with an incorrect final prediction. Three qualitative examples trace AffectAgent from its generated query through retrieved evidence and reasoning to the final emotion prediction. The examples show a smooth success, a deviated query with a correct prediction, and a deviated query with an incorrect prediction.
SFT
Retrieval
MER2023
MER2024
HIT ↑
Δ HIT
HIT ↑
Δ HIT
×
×
20.24
—
18.32
—
✓
×
24.12
+3.88
22.45
+4.13
✓
Naive RAG
26.58
+6.34
24.71
+6.39
✓
AffectAgent
28.80
+8.56
27.53
+9.21
Table 4. Stepwise effectiveness of our components. We utilize the generic MLLM Video-LLaMA2 as the base model. Δ HIT indicates the absolute improvement over the zero-shot baseline.
Planner
Filter
Confuse Evid.
Counter Evid.
MER2023
MER2024
HIT ↑
Δ HIT
HIT ↑
Δ HIT
×
✓
✓
✓
27.15
−1.65
25.86
−1.67
✓
×
✓
✓
27.94
−0.86
26.65
−0.88
×
×
✓
✓
26.58
−2.22
24.71
−2.82
✓
✓
×
×
27.42
−1.38
26.11
−1.42
✓
✓
✓
×
28.11
−0.69
26.75
−0.78
Table 5. Ablation on Multi-Agent coordination and Evidence Structures based on Video-LLaMA2. All variants retain primary evidence. Δ HIT indicates the performance drop compared to the full framework.
Figure 4. Visualization of RAAF and MB-MoE in AffectAgent on sampled MER2023 data with AffectGPT as the backbone. (a) Performance gain (pp) under different retrieval conditions. (b) Average expert routing weights under different input states. Two plots summarize the fusion modules. The first compares performance gains under different retrieval conditions, and the second compares average MB-MoE expert-routing weights for different modality input states.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive performance in multimodal emotion recognition (MER) tasks and lifted MER to a new level that is complex emotion understanding with advanced video understanding abilities and natural language description. However, existing MLLM-based methods often use a fixed prompt to perceive the emotions, ignoring the dynamicity and complexity of the emotion source in the multimodal inputs. To address these issues, we propose a novel Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Agent Specialization framework (EmoAgent-R1) to optimize the emotion recognition, reasoning, and generalization abilities of an MLLM with dynamic agent specialization based on reinforcement learning. Specifically, we first adopt a cold start strategy to endow an MLLM with preliminary emotion recognition, reasoning, and agent routing ability by training with synthetic answer-conditioned chain-of-thought data and agent routing data. Then, we further train the MLLM with reinforcement learning to perceive emotions in a two-step agentic workflow with agent selection and agent specialization. To effectively train EmoAgent-R1, we propose a novel Progressive Group-Relative Policy Optimization (P-GRPO) to combine group-based relative advantages with a PMI-inspired progressive token-level modulation to transform sparse rewards into fine-grained learning signals, mitigating the coarse-grained uniform credit assignment issue in GRPO. Extensive experiments on MER benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our EmoAgent-R1 in stronger emotion reasoning performance and improved optimization stability.
Lihuang Fang, Yuchen Zou, kebing Jin +1
Guangdong University of Technology Guangzhou, China · Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen, China · Xi’an Jiaotong University Xi’an, China +1
Humans infer emotions by integrating observed multimodal cues with expectations about how affective states may unfold. Existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs), however, often treat emotion recognition as static fusion over complete audiovisual-text inputs, leaving affective dynamics implicit. We propose AffectVerse, a Qwen2.5-Omni-based model equipped with an Emotion World Module (EWM), an action-free representation-level module for short-horizon latent affective prediction. \rev{EWM contains three modules: 1) Cross-Modal Temporal Imagination predicts future video/audio representations from past tokens with multi-step rollout. 2) MAMA(Modality-Aware Multi-step Attention) Belief Aggregation compresses imagined tokens into modality-aware belief tokens. 3) Belief Injection inserts these belief tokens into the LLM for affective reasoning.} AffectVerse uses future prediction as a past-conditioned self-supervised signal: it does not replace modeling observed history or require unseen signals at inference, but forces the current belief state to encode transition cues that are predictive of subsequent affective change. Across nine benchmarks, AffectVerse improves at least 2.57% over other models, while controlled ablations show additive gains from temporal imagination, cross-modal rollout, and belief aggregation. These results suggest predictive belief-state modeling is a practical alternative for affective computing.
Bo Zhao, Fanghua Ye, Yixin Ji +3
1Great Bay University · 2Tencent · 3Tsinghua University +1
Multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition in conversations demand effective modeling of heterogeneous interactions across textual, acoustic, and visual modalities. Although large language models (LLMs) offer powerful language understanding, adapting them to multimodal affective computing remains challenging: full-model fine-tuning is computationally prohibitive, while many existing lightweight adapters fail to preserve rich textual cues during cross-modal fusion. To address these limitations, we propose the multi-view text-guided multimodal fusion adapter (MVFA), a parameter-efficient framework that augments frozen LLMs with strong multimodal reasoning capability. MVFA first constructs complementary text views via max pooling, mean pooling, and attention pooling; these views then guide cross-modal interactions with audio and visual features. The fused multimodal representations are subsequently compressed into a compact set of learnable pseudo-tokens through an Enhanced Q-Former Fusion Module. Using ChatGLM3-6B-base as the primary backbone, we further validate MVFA on LLaMA2-7B and Qwen3-8B to examine its portability across multiple frozen LLM backbones. MVFA is evaluated on three challenging datasets: CH-SIMS V2.0, MELD, and CHERMA. Experimental results demonstrate that MVFA achieves state-of-the-art performance on key metrics while updating only a small fraction of parameters. Specifically, it attains 84.62% Acc2 and 84.59% F1 on CH-SIMS V2.0, 67.36% Acc and 66.03% WF1 on MELD, and 74.66% Acc on CHERMA. These findings establish multi-view text-guided fusion as an effective and scalable paradigm for parameter-efficient multimodal LLM adaptation in affective computing. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Overwhelm1208/MVFA.
Pengfei Shao, Jisheng Dang, Jiawen Fang +7
School of Information Science and Technology, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangdong, China · School of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, China +2