Distorted or Fabricated? A Survey on Hallucination in Video LLMs

Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) have shown strong progress in video understanding, yet they still suffer from hallucinations that are inconsistent with visual evidence. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on object hallucination or coarse action perception, leaving a key video-specific problem underexplored: motion hallucination, in which models infer human motions that are absent from the video. We present MoHallBench, a benchmark for diagnosing motion hallucination in VideoLLMs. MoHallBench systematically evaluates three major sources of hallucination: co-occurrence priors, sequential inference, and similarity confusion. It contains 11,306 video clips and 40,493 question-answer pairs, covering binary-choice, multiple-choice, and generative settings. We further introduce a bi-directional questioning protocol with bias-aware metrics to reduce affirmation bias in binary evaluation. Experiments on ten recent open-source VideoLLMs reveal a clear decoupling between action recognition and hallucination resistance, as models that perform well on positive action recognition often fail on adversarial negatives. Among all settings, sequential inference hallucination is the most severe, showing that current models tend to over-infer expected outcomes from partial motion cues. Our analyses further confirm that stronger priors and finer-grained similarity substantially amplify hallucination. We hope MoHallBench can facilitate future evaluation and mitigation of motion hallucination in VideoLLMs.

We introduce VidPair-Halluc, a new benchmark for evaluating video hallucination in large video models (LVMs) under rigorous and controlled conditions. Unlike previous benchmarks that primarily rely on text-based perturbations or adversarial questions while neglecting the consistency of visual backgrounds, VidPair-Halluc features video pairs with highly similar backgrounds but distinctly different foreground semantics, enabling precise attribution of model errors to genuine hallucination rather than background variation. The benchmark is constructed through PairFlow, a pipeline that leverages recent advances in text-to-image and video generation to systematically compose stories, generate coherent video clips, and assemble them into adversarial pairs. Covering both spatial and temporal reasoning across ten semantic aspects, VidPair-Halluc comprises 1K high-quality adversarial video pairs and 11K spatio-temporal QA pairs with control over background and foreground variations. Evaluations on mainstream LVMs show persistent difficulty with robust fine-grained video understanding in adversarial settings, and code and data are available at the https://jethrojames.github.io/VidPair-Halluc/.

Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) remain prone to spatiotemporal hallucinations, often generating visually unsupported details or incorrect temporal relations. Existing mitigation methods typically treat hallucination as a uniform decoding failure, applying globally shared correction rules. We instead observe that decoder layers contribute differently to visual grounding and later linguistic composition, indicating that intervention must be layer-aware. Based on this insight, we propose STEAR, a layer-aware spatiotemporal evidence intervention framework. STEAR identifies high-risk decoding steps and selects token-conditioned visual evidence from grounding-sensitive middle layers. It uses this shared evidence for two coupled purposes: restoring missing local grounding in middle layers, and constructing temporally perturbed patch-level counterfactuals to falsify inconsistent reasoning during late-layer decoding. Consequently, STEAR mitigates both spatial and temporal hallucinations within an efficient single-encode inference framework. Experiments across representative Video-LLM backbones and challenging benchmarks demonstrate that STEAR consistently reduces hallucinations while improving faithfulness, temporal consistency, and robustness. Our results confirm that reliable video decoding relies on intervening on precise evidence at the right layer, rather than enforcing a global penalty. The code is provided in the Supplementary Material.