An Optimal Sauer Lemma Over $k$-ary Alphabets

While the optimal sample complexity of binary classification in terms of the VC dimension is well-established, determining the optimal sample complexity of multiclass classification has remained open. The appropriate complexity parameter for multiclass classification is the DS dimension, and despite significant efforts, a gap of $\sqrt{\text{DS}}$ has persisted between the upper and lower bounds on sample complexity. Recent work by Hanneke et al. (2026) shows a novel algebraic characterization of multiclass hypothesis classes in terms of their DS dimension. Building up on this, we show that the maximum hypergraph density of any multiclass hypothesis class is upper-bounded by its DS dimension. This proves a longstanding conjecture of Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz (2014). As a consequence, we determine the optimal dependence of the sample complexity on the DS dimension for multiclass as well as list learning.

Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints ($d_{DS}/n$ realizable, $\sqrt{d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n$ agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk $L^\star$, the optimal excess risk is $\widetildeΘ(\sqrt{L^\star d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n)$, uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither $L^\star$ nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-$k$ compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator $h$ has population risk at most $L(h)+O(\sqrt{L(h)Γ}+Γ)$ with $Γ=(k\log n+\log(1/δ))/n$, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed $L^\star$, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to $L^\star$ and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best $r$-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor $r$ from the known realizable list lower bound.

We study the list replicability number in the realizable PAC learning framework and prove that every concept class $H$ over a countable domain with Littlestone dimension $d$ and dual VC dimension $v^*$ satisfies $$\mathrm{LR}(H)\leq 2^{O(d\min\{\log d,v^*\})}.$$ This matches the worst-case lower bound of $2^{Ω(d)}$ up to a logarithmic factor in the exponent and exponentially improves the previous best upper bound $\mathrm{LR}(H)\le 2^{2^{O(d)}}$ of Bun, Livni, and Moran [FOCS 2020]. Unlike earlier bounds of $2^{O_ε(d^2)}$ for fixed accuracy $ε>0$ implied by the work of Ghazi, Golowich, Kumar, and Manurangsi [STOC 2021] and Lyu [STOC 2026], our bound is independent of $ε$. The $2^{O(d\log d)}$ bound follows from a new inductive framework for bounding list replicability that builds on the recent notion of irreducibility from differentially private learning. The $2^{O(dv^*)}$ bound follows from a simple globally stable learner that takes the majority vote of multiple empirical risk minimizers, with stability established using tools from stable regularity.