Does Dimensionality Reduction via Random Projections Preserve Landscape Features?
Authors: Iván Olarte Rodríguez, Anja Jankovic, Thomas Bäck, Elena Raponi
Abstract
Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) provides numerical features for characterizing black-box optimization problems. In high-dimensional settings, however, ELA suffers from sparsity effects, high estimator variance, and the prohibitive cost of computing several feature classes. Dimensionality reduction has therefore been proposed as a way to make ELA applicable in such settings, but it remains unclear whether features computed in reduced spaces still reflect intrinsic properties of the original landscape. In this work, we investigate the robustness of ELA features under dimensionality reduction via Random Gaussian Embeddings (RGEs). Starting from the same sampled points and objective values, we compute ELA features in projected spaces and compare them to those obtained in the original search space across multiple sample budgets and embedding dimensions. Our results show that linear random projections often alter the geometric and topological structure relevant to ELA, yielding feature values that are no longer representative of the original problem. While a small subset of features remains comparatively stable, most are highly sensitive to the embedding. Moreover, robustness under projection does not necessarily imply informativeness, as apparently robust features may still reflect projection-induced artifacts rather than intrinsic landscape characteristics.
Classical space-filling designs often fail to provide reliable statistical results for Exploratory Landscape Analysis (ELA) when only limited evaluation budgets are available, as commonly occurs in high-dimensional problems or other resource-constrained settings, resulting in noisy and unstable landscape descriptors. To address this challenge, we propose an alternative sampling strategy for ELA based on random linear embeddings. Rather than sampling uniformly in the full decision space, we allocate the budget to randomly oriented low-dimensional subspaces and investigate whether this improves the robustness of the resulting landscape descriptors. We compare full-space and embedding-based sampling strategies across several classical ELA feature sets on the noiseless Black-Box Optimization Benchmarking (BBOB) test suite from the COmparing Continuous Optimizers (COCO) environment, in a 20-dimensional setting. Our results suggest that random linear embeddings constitute a promising alternative for budget-constrained ELA, although their effectiveness remains dependent on the feature class and the underlying problem.
Iván Olarte Rodríguez, Anja Jankovic, Thomas Bäck +1
Landscape feature representations play a central role in automated algorithm selection and meta-learning for black-box optimization, yet little is known about how different representations agree (or disagree) in the structures they impose on problem spaces. This paper presents a systematic unsupervised evaluation of four state-of-the-art representations (ELA, DeepELA, TransOptAS, and DoE2Vec) using a diverse set of affine combinations of BBOB functions (MA-BBOB). By applying extensive clustering analyses, coverage-based stability measures, and cross-representation similarity assessments, we show that each representation organizes the same problems in markedly different ways: ELA and TransOptAS form compact geometric structures, DeepELA provides a balanced intermediate view, and DoE2Vec achieves strong semantic alignment but with substantial fragmentation. Our results reveal that no single representation dominates; rather, they capture complementary aspects of the underlying landscapes. These findings highlight the importance of multi-view analyses for understanding representation behavior and offer guidance on selecting or combining representations in downstream meta-learning and algorithm selection tasks. In addition, across two different algorithm families (Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization), we show that landscape representations face an inherent trade-off in how well they align structural landscape descriptions with observed performance, indicating that no single representation can fully capture algorithm performance.
Sara Gjorgjieva, Eva Tuba, Barbara Koroušić Seljak +2
We revisit random projections for reducing the dimension of high-dimensional polygonal curves. Drawing from the toolbox of randomized linear algebra, we give a considerably simplified proof of the known O(ε−2log(nm)) bound on the target dimension of a random projection that preserves the continuous Fréchet distance of polygonal curves up to a factor (1±ε). Our proof is based on the concept of sparse oblivious subspace embeddings. While previous techniques were limited to the case of the Fréchet distance, our techniques are fairly general and extend to all possible distance measures that involve the maximum, a sum or an integral over Euclidean distances between pairs of points on both input curves. We define a generalized dissimilarity measure for curves that includes several popular measures such as Fréchet, q-DTW, Hausdorff, etc. as special cases and show that the same dimension reduction technique works for this generalized dissimilarity measure. Finally, we apply the same framework for dimension reduction to piecewise linear surfaces, after extending the distance measure suitably to such surfaces.