ZoomSpec: A Physics-Guided Coarse-to-Fine Framework for Wideband Spectrum Sensing
Organizations: Key Laboratory for Information Science of Electromagnetic Waves (MoE), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Abstract
Wideband spectrum sensing for low-altitude monitoring is critical yet challenging due to heterogeneous protocols,large bandwidths, and non-stationary SNR. Existing data-driven approaches treat spectrograms as natural images,suffering from domain mismatch: they neglect time-frequency resolution constraints and spectral leakage, leading topoor narrowband visibility. This paper proposes ZoomSpec, a physics-guided coarse-to-fine framework integrating signal processing priors with deep learning. We introduce a Log-Space STFT (LS-STFT) to overcome the geometric bottleneck of linear spectrograms, sharpening narrowband structures while maintaining constant relative resolution. A lightweight Coarse Proposal Net (CPN) rapidly screens the full band. To bridge coarse detection and fine recognition, we design an Adaptive Heterodyne Low-Pass (AHLP) module that executes center-frequency aligning, bandwidth-matched filtering, and safe decimation, purifying signals of out-of-band interference. A Fine Recognition Net (FRN) fuses purified time-domain I/Q with spectral magnitude via dual-domain attention to jointly refine temporal boundaries and modulation classification. Evaluations on the SpaceNet real-world dataset demonstrate state-of-the-art 78.1 [email protected]:0.95, surpassing existing leaderboard systems with superior stability across diverse modulation bandwidths.
Figures & tables
| Dataset | SpaceNet | |
| Modulation families | 14 | |
| Sampling rate (MHz) | Train | 5, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80 |
| Test | 20, 30, 40, 50, 80 | |
| Duration (ms) | Train | 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150 |
| Test | 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 200 | |
| Signals per file | Train | 1-8 |
| Module | Parameter | Value | Physical/Empirical Justification |
| LS-STFT | 1 MHz | Matches typical narrowband width and integer channel align. | |
| 1, 4 | Prevents over-concentration while magnifying details. | ||
| AHLP | 0.2 | Moderate bandwidth expansion for safety. | |
| 0.1 | Standard transition width (10%) for FIR design. | ||
| Training | Optimizer | AdamW | Better generalization stability. |
| Learning Rate | Standard for Transformer-based architectures. |
| Method | mAP 50:95 | Precision | Recall |
| YOLO11 STFT | 50.3 | 0.76 | 0.62 |
| YOLO11 LS-STFT | 62.7 | 0.83 | 0.76 |
| RF-DETR STFT | 53.4 | 0.78 | 0.66 |
| RF-DETR LS-STFT | 69.9 | 0.86 | 0.81 |
| D-FINE STFT | 60.6 | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| D-FINE LS-STFT | 74.3 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
| Class | YOLO11 | RF-DETR | D-FINE | Ours | |||
| STFT | LS-STFT | STFT | LS-STFT | STFT | LS-STFT | ||
| WiFi 20MHz QPSK | 66.1 | 66.2 | 71.2 | 70.5 | 70.3 | 71.2 | 71.5 |
| WiFi 20MHz 16QAM | 59.5 | 61.6 | 62.9 | 63.7 | 61.8 | 63.2 | 63.9 |
| WiFi 20MHz 64QAM | 65.8 | 66.6 | 70.1 | 72.3 | 72.5 | 72.8 | 72.8 |
| WiFi 40MHz QPSK | 60.1 | 73.4 | 64.2 | 78.3 | 71.7 | 78.4 | 78.4 |
| WiFi 40MHz 16QAM | 56.2 | 69.7 | 60.0 | 76.3 | 68.0 | 76.2 | 76.9 |
| Method | Latency (ms) | Params (M) | Input size |
| YOLO11 | 11.3 | 59.3 | |
| RF-DETR | 15.1 | 33.7 | |
| D-FINE | 22.1 | 62.0 | |
| Ours | 16.8 | 60.7 |
| Variant | LS-STFT | CPN | AHLP | FRN | Fusion Mode | [email protected]:0.95 |
| Baseline with STFT | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | full | 58.8 |
| + LS-STFT | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | full | 72.3 |
| Fusion ablations within FRN | ||||||
| I/Q only | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | I/Q only | 66.5 |
| FFT only | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | FFT only | 43.7 |
| w/o cross-domain fusion | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | no fusion | 76.7 |
Wireless Communications
Wireless communications studies how information is sent over radio links and how networks manage signals, spectrum, and resources reliably.
See all 399 papers