Enhancing Reinforcement Learning for Radiology Report Generation with Evidence-aware Rewards and Self-correcting Preference Learning

Automated radiology report generation (RRG) has gained increasing attention because it can reduce the heavy workload of clinical report writing. However, most existing methods mainly optimize for natural language generation (NLG) metrics that focus on language fluency, while providing little control over clinically important factors such as precision and recall. As consequence, generated reports may be fluent but not well aligned with different clinical needs. To address this challenge, we propose a reinforcement learning framework for precision recall controllable RRG, where a control parameter explicitly adjusts the trade-off between clinical precision and recall during inference. This design allows the model to flexibly generate reports according to different clinical requirements. To ensure clinical correctness, we introduce a clinical reward into the training objective, which helps improve clinical efficacy (CE) beyond standard language-based optimization. In addition, we apply a group-relative training strategy that normalizes rewards within each training group, reducing reward variance and improving training stability. Extensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR dataset show that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both NLG and CE evaluation metrics, while providing reliable control over the CE precision recall trade-off.

Radiologists highly desire fully automated AI for radiology report generation (R2G), yet existing approaches fall short in clinical utility. Reinforcement learning (RL) holds potential to address these shortcomings, but its adoption in this task remains underexplored. In this paper, we revisit RL in terms of data efficiency and optimization effectiveness for R2G tasks. First, we explore the impact of data quantity and quality on the performance of RL in medical contexts, revealing that data quality plays a more critical role than quantity. To this end, we propose a diagnostic diversity-based data sampling strategy that enables comparable performance with fewer samples. Second, we observe that the majority of tokens in radiology reports are template-like and diagnostically uninformative, whereas the low frequency of clinically critical tokens heightens the risk of being overlooked during optimization. To tackle this, we introduce Diagnostic Token-weighted Policy Optimization (DiTPO), which directly optimizes for clinical accuracy by using a diagnostic F1 score as the reward signal. Unlike standard RL approaches that treat all tokens equally, DiTPO explicitly models the varying importance of different tokens through rule- or gradient-based mechanisms to prioritize clinically relevant content. Extensive experiments on the MIMIC-CXR, IU-Xray, and CheXpert Plus datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance while requiring substantially fewer training samples in RL. Notably, on MIMIC-CXR, our framework attains an F1 score of 0.516 using only 20% of the RL training samples.

We propose MARL-Rad, a multi-modal multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for radiology report generation that trains the entire agentic system on policy within its deployed radiology workflow. MARL-Rad addresses the limitation of post-hoc agentization, where fixed LLMs are organized into hand-designed agentic workflows without being optimized for their assigned roles. Our framework decomposes chest X-ray interpretation into region-specific agents and a global integrating agent, and jointly optimizes them using clinically verifiable rewards. Experiments on the MIMIC-CXR and IU X-ray datasets show that MARL-Rad consistently improves clinical efficacy metrics such as RadGraph, CheXbert, and GREEN scores, achieving state-of-the-art clinical efficacy performance. Further analyses show that MARL-Rad improves laterality consistency and produces more accurate and detailed reports. A blinded clinician evaluation further suggests that MARL-Rad produces reports clinically comparable to ground-truth reports.