Organizations: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China. · School of Mathematics and Statistics & State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China. · School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China. · Nuclear Power Institute of China, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China.
Integro-differential equations arise in a wide range of applications, including transport, kinetic theory, radiative transfer, and multiphysics modeling, where nonlocal integral operators couple the solution across phase space. Such nonlocality often introduces dense coupling blocks in deterministic discretizations, leading to increased computational cost and memory usage, while physics-informed neural networks may suffer from expensive nonconvex training and sensitivity to hyperparameter choices. In this work, we present randomized neural networks (RaNNs) as a mesh-free collocation framework for linear integro-differential equations. Because the RaNN approximation is intrinsically dense through globally supported random features, the nonlocal integral operator does not introduce an additional loss of sparsity, while the approximate solution can still be represented with relatively few trainable degrees of freedom. By randomly fixing the hidden-layer parameters and solving only for the linear output weights, the training procedure reduces to a convex least-squares problem in the output coefficients, enabling stable and efficient optimization. As a representative application, we apply the proposed framework to the steady neutron transport equation, a high-dimensional linear integro-differential model featuring scattering integrals and diverse boundary conditions. Extensive numerical experiments demonstrate that, in the reported test settings, the RaNN approach achieves competitive accuracy while incurring substantially lower training cost than the selected neural and deterministic baselines, highlighting RaNNs as a robust and efficient alternative for the numerical simulation of nonlocal linear operators.
Figures & tables
batch
particles
RSD min
RSD max
RSD average
Example 3
Case 1
1000
100000
7.2572e-04
1.6919e-03
9.9630e-04
Case 2
10000
500000
5.3084e-04
1.0547e-03
6.6250e-04
Case 3
1000
200000
6.1908e-04
1.2144e-03
7.5330e-04
Example 4
Case 1
1000
20000
6.0193e-04
9.7435e-04
6.7397e-04
Case 2
1000
20000
2.7252e-03
4.1608e-03
3.0236e-03
Case 3
1000
20000
6.1269e-04
9.5861e-04
6.8497e-04
Table 1: The input parameters and the output statistics for MCX in Example 3 - Example 5 .
x/b
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
time(s)
reference values ( [ 20 ] )
1
0.947144
0.793726
0.553290
0.214192
S200
M=100
0
2.5234e-03
7.1902e-03
3.3957e-03
5.5280e-03
0.685501
M=200
0
1.3404e-03
2.1758e-04
1.3529e-03
1.6924e-03
1.353178
M=300
0
3.3128e-04
3.7247e-03
4.1807e-04
8.0292e-04
1.967209
RaNN
m=200
0
2.5791e-04
1.2351e-03
9.9065e-04
9.4649e-02
0.017503
m=500
0
2.3516e-05
5.2369e-05
6.4748e-05
4.5558e-02
0.041313
Table 2: Pointwise relative errors and runtimes for the FDM and the RaNN method in Example 1 .
m
100
200
400
800
PINN-IDNT
PINN-EDNT
eℓ2
5.1349e-02
5.2151e-03
1.8812e-03
1.4699e-03
3.5101e-03
4.8811e-03
time(s)
0.0478
0.1049
0.2501
0.4822
28991.51
6525.75
Table 3: Relative ℓ2 errors of the scalar flux for RaNN and PINN in Example 2 (Case 1). PINN results are quoted from [ 17 ] and were obtained under different experimental conditions.
LRaNN
PINN-IDNT
PINN-EDNT
eℓ2
1.5945e-02
3.8502e-02
3.7632e-02
time(s)
6.85
34706.51
4542.73
Table 4: Relative ℓ2 errors of LRaNN method and PINN method in Case 2 of Example 2 .
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
r
2
2
2
RaNN
eℓ2
2.1970e-02
2.2756e-02
6.5209e-02
time(s)
682.04
686.78
655.53
RaNN-S
eℓ2
2.5098e-02
2.4902e-02
6.7096e-02
time(s)
392.22
369.59
342.40
Table 5: Parameter settings and relative ℓ2 errors of the scalar flux for RaNN in Example 3 (RaNN-S: sketching acceleration with the same settings as RaNN).
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
RaNN
r
4
2
3
eℓ2
4.0388e-03
4.5391e-03
8.0339e-03
time(s)
685.16
686.21
664.10
RaNN-S
eℓ2
4.1324e-03
8.0447e-03
7.8753e-03
time(s)
347.07
355.65
341.70
FV
(Nφ,Nμ)
(16,16)
Table 6: Parameter settings and relative ℓ2 errors of the scalar flux for RaNN and FV in Example 4 .
g
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
Dr1
3.558980e-1
6.596100e-1
9.607760e-1
1.108734e-0
6.236020e-1
7.903360e-1
1.128812e-0
Dr2
3.184120e-1
8.259400e-1
1.180620e-0
1.168700e-0
1.436000e-0
2.508900e-0
5.300760e-0
Table 7: Macroscopic total cross sections Σt,g (cm -1 ) for the two regions in Example 5 .
Table 8: Macroscopic scattering cross sections Σs,g′→g (cm -1 ) in region Dr1 for Example 5 .
Table 9: Macroscopic scattering cross sections Σs,g′→g (cm -1 ) in region Dr2 for Example 5 .
g
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
time(s)
eℓ2
5.6894e-02
3.1044e-02
4.5269e-02
9.8361e-02
1.4397e-01
1.9357e-01
2.4744e-01
3942.39
Table 10: Relative ℓ2 errors and runtime of RaNN-S method in Example 5 .
Neural PDE solvers use trainable models to approximate solutions or solution operators for partial differential equations, often with physical constraints.
Neural networks with randomly generated hidden weights (RaNNs) have been extensively studied, both as a standalone learning method and as an initialization for fully trainable deep learning methods. In this work, we study RaNN expressivity for learning solutions to non-linear partial differential equations (PDEs). Despite their widespread use in practical applications, a rigorous theoretical understanding of the approximation properties of RaNNs in this context remains limited. Here, we derive error bounds for RaNN approximations to time-dependent Sobolev functions and obtain a dimension-free approximation rate 21 for sufficiently regular functions. We apply our results to two important classes of non-linear PDEs: Porous Medium Equations and Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations, showing that RaNNs are capable of efficiently approximating solutions to these complex, non-linear PDEs. Our theoretical analysis is supported by numerical experiments, showing that the obtained convergence rates extend beyond the considered setting.
Muhammed Ali Mehmood, Lukas Gonon
Department of Mathematics Imperial College London UK · School of Computer Science University of St. Gallen Switzerland
RaNNDy is a randomized neural network architecture for the data-driven approximation of transfer operators associated with complex dynamical systems. The weights and biases of the hidden layers of the network are randomly initialized and kept fixed, only the output layer is trained. This has several advantages over fully optimized neural networks, notably a closed-form solution for the output layer and significantly lower training costs. Despite these advantages, RaNNDy is restricted to the initial selection of weights and biases that parametrize the basis functions required for the operator approximation. Since the basis functions are determined by the activation function, choosing an appropriate activation function for the hidden layers is crucial. In this work, we propose an algorithm that optimizes the activation function itself, while keeping the weights and biases in the randomized neural network fixed, providing a more suitable dictionary. We illustrate the efficacy of the approach using various benchmark problems, including stochastic differential equations and random walks on graphons.
Mohammad Tabish, Stefan Klus
Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Edinburgh and Heriot–Watt University, Edinburgh, UK · School of Mathematical & Computer Sciences, Heriot–Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
Randomized neural networks (RaNNs) are attractive for partial differential equations (PDEs) because they replace expensive end-to-end training with a linear least-squares solve over randomized hidden features. Their practical performance, however, depends strongly on the sampling distribution of the hidden-layer parameters, which is usually chosen heuristically and problem by problem. This distribution sensitivity is a central bottleneck in randomized neural PDE solvers. In this work, we propose Adaptive-Distribution Randomized Neural Networks (AD-RaNN), a framework that promotes randomized feature generation from a fixed heuristic choice to a low-dimensional adaptive optimization problem. Instead of training all hidden weights and biases, AD-RaNN parameterizes the hidden-feature sampling distribution by a low-dimensional vector p and optimizes only p, thereby preserving the least-squares structure of RaNNs while reducing manual distribution tuning. The method uses a two-stage strategy: ridge-regularized reduced training for stable distribution-parameter optimization, followed by an unregularized least-squares refit for final solution recovery. We develop two adaptive mechanisms, PDE-Driven Adaptive Distribution (PDAD) and Data-Driven Adaptive Distribution (DDAD), and deploy them in space-time solvers, discrete-time solvers, and operator-learning models. We also incorporate an adaptive layer-growth enhancement for localized structures. For the reduced optimization problem, we establish well-posedness of the reduced objectives, consistency of ridge-regularized minimizers, an efficient gradient formula, and a practical lower-bound estimate for the ridge parameter. Numerical experiments on benchmark problems show that AD-RaNN provides an effective distribution-level adaptation mechanism, reduces reliance on hand-crafted hidden-feature distributions, and achieves strong empirical accuracy.
You Yang, Fei Wang
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China. · School of Mathematics and Statistics & State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710049, China.