NuHF Claw: A Risk Constrained Cognitive Agent Framework for Human Centered Procedure Support in Digital Nuclear Control Rooms

Operator situation awareness is a pivotal yet elusive determinant of human reliability in complex nuclear control environments. Existing assessment methods, such as SAGAT and SART, remain static, retrospective, and detached from the evolving cognitive dynamics that drive operational risk. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces the dynamic Bayesian machine learning framework for situation awareness (DBML SA), a unified approach that fuses probabilistic reasoning and data driven intelligence to achieve quantitative, interpretable, and predictive situation awareness modeling. Leveraging 212 operational event reports (2007 to 2021), the framework reconstructs the causal temporal structure of 11 performance shaping factors across multiple cognitive layers. The Bayesian component enables time evolving inference of situation awareness reliability under uncertainty, while the neural component establishes a nonlinear predictive mapping from PSFs to SART scores, achieving a mean absolute percentage error of 13.8 % with statistical consistency to subjective evaluations (p > 0.05). Results highlight training quality and stress dynamics as primary drivers of situation awareness degradation. Overall, DBML SA transcends traditional questionnaire-based assessments by enabling real-time cognitive monitoring, sensitivity analysis, and early-warning prediction, paving the way toward intelligent human machine reliability management in next-generation digital main control rooms.

Team-level failure in nuclear control rooms arises not from isolated operator error, but from emergent interaction dynamics, delayed diagnosis, suppressed dissent, and authority-driven error propagation, that conventional human reliability analysis methods are structurally unable to model. This study introduces TEAM-SimHRA, a multi-agent large language model simulation framework that reconceptualizes human reliability as an interaction-driven emergent property of control room teams rather than a static individual attribute. Unlike existing approaches that assign fixed error probabilities to predefined tasks, TEAM-SimHRA reproduces collective cognition, role-conditioned authority dynamics, and real-time communication suppression across temporally evolving accident progressions. Validated against the Three Mile Island (1979) and Chernobyl (1986) accidents, the two most extensively documented nuclear team failures , the framework achieves face-validity pass rates of 43.5% and 52.6% respectively, reproducing near-historical decision delay (134.8 vs. 138 min), perfect communication suppression stability, and full authority pressure cascade at historically accurate propagation depth. These results demonstrate that multi-agent simulation can extract quantitative team-level reliability indicators that are inaccessible to traditional methods, opening a viable path toward simulation-based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment for safety-critical sociotechnical systems.

The rapid deployment of autonomous AI agents across enterprise, healthcare, and safety-critical environments has created a fundamental governance gap. Existing approaches, runtime guardrails, training-time alignment, and post-hoc auditing treat governance as an external constraint rather than an internalized behavioral principle, leaving agents vulnerable to unsafe and irreversible actions. We address this gap by drawing on how humans self-govern naturally: before acting, humans engage deliberate cognitive processes grounded in executive function, inhibitory control, and internalized organizational rules to evaluate whether an intended action is permissible, requires modification, or demands escalation. This paper proposes a neurocognitive governance framework that formally maps this human self-governance process to LLM-driven agent reasoning, establishing a structural parallel between the human brain and the large language model as the cognitive core of an agent. We formalize a Pre-Action Governance Reasoning Loop (PAGRL) in which agents consult a four-layer governance rule set: global, workflow-specific, agent-specific, and situational before every consequential action, mirroring how human organizations structure compliance hierarchies across enterprise, department, and role levels. Implemented on a production-grade retail supply chain workflow, the framework achieves 95% compliance accuracy and zero false escalations to human oversight, demonstrating that embedding governance into agent reasoning produces more consistent, explainable, and auditable compliance than external enforcement. This work offers a principled foundation for autonomous AI agents that govern themselves the way humans do: not because rules are imposed upon them, but because deliberation is embedded in how they think.