PolyBench: Benchmarking LLM Forecasting and Trading Capabilities on Live Prediction Market Data
Organizations: College of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China · School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Abstract
Predicting real-world events from live market signals demands systems that fuse qualitative news with quantitative order-book dynamics under strict temporal discipline -- a challenge existing benchmarks fail to capture. We present PolyBench, a multimodal benchmark derived from Polymarket that records point-in-time cross-sections of 38,666 binary prediction markets spanning 4,997 events, synchronously coupling each snapshot with a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) state and a real-time news stream. Using PolyBench, we evaluate seven state-of-the-art Large Language Models -- spanning open- and closed-source families -- generating 36,165 predictions under identical, timestamp-locked market states collected between February 6 and 12, 2026. Our multidimensional framework assesses directional accuracy, our proposed Confidence-Weighted Return (CWR), Annualized Percentage Yield (APY), and Sharpe ratio via realistic order-book execution simulation. The results reveal a pronounced performance divergence: only two of seven models achieve positive financial returns -- MiMo-V2-Flash at 17.6% CWR and Gemini-3-Flash at 6.2% CWR -- while the remaining five incur losses despite uniformly high stated confidence. These findings highlight the gap between surface-level language fluency and genuine probabilistic reasoning under live market uncertainty, and establish PolyBench as a contamination-proof, financially-grounded evaluation standard for future LLM research. Our dataset and code available at https://github.com/PolyBench/PolyBench.
Figures & tables
| Method | Markets | w/ Polymarket | w/ Order Book | w/ News | CWR Eval. |
| Time-LLM [ 13 ] | – | ||||
| AgentBench [ 16 ] | – | ||||
| FinBERT [ 1 ] | – | ✓ | |||
| BloombergGPT [ 21 ] | – | ✓ | |||
| Autocast [ 25 ] | 6,707 | ✓ | |||
| Prophet Arena [ 22 ] | 1,367 | ✓ |
| Field | Description |
| decision | The specific target option identifier |
| outcome | The exact predicted position mapping |
| strategy | A classification of the trading rationale (e.g., value_bet , news_catalyst ) |
| confidence | A scalar conviction score ( ) |
| est_resolution_date | The model’s estimated temporal timeline for market settlement |
| reasoning | A concise, specific rationale validating the position |
| Component | Count | Notes |
| Events | 4,997 | |
| Active | 2,904 | Open at collection time |
| Resolved | 2,093 | Closed / expired |
| Markets | 38,666 | |
| Active | 26,784 | Open at collection time |
| Inactive | 11,882 | Settled or delisted |
| Model Name | Company | Service Provider | Quantization | Cost | Open Source |
| GPT-OSS-120B | OpenAI | DeepInfra | FP4 | $ 1.34 | Yes |
| DeepSeek-V3.2 | DeepSeek | Atlas Cloud | FP8 | $ 3.32 | |
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Xiaomi | Xiaomi | FP8 | $ 1.72 | |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | MiniMax | Inceptron | FP8 | $ 8.43 | |
| Trinity-Large-Preview | Arcee AI | Prime | - | Free | |
| Gemini-3-Flash-Preview | Vertex AI | - | $ 11.50 | No |
| Model | Accuracy | Avg. Conf. | Non-CWR | CWR | APY | Sharpe |
| Gemini-3-Flash | 75.0% | 0.855 | 4.1% | 6.2% | 1486.5% | 0.01 |
| MiMo-V2-Flash | 62.1% | 0.859 | 11.1% | 17.6% | 4067.3% | 0.02 |
| Grok-4.1-Fast | 59.1% | 0.862 | -15.9% | -12.1% | -5820.4% | -0.17 |
| GPT-OSS-120B | 58.0% | 0.836 | -19.4% | -17.8% | -7075.8% | -0.22 |
| DeepSeek-V3.2 | 53.5% | 0.838 | -15.3% | -11.4% | -5571.8% | -0.03 |
| Trinity-Large | 42.7% | 0.871 | -12.4% | -9.2% | -4527.8% | -0.02 |
| Model | Value Bet | News Cat. | Arbitrage | Stable Yld. | Invalid Strat. |
| Gemini-3-Flash | 80.2% ( 7.2% , 0.01) | 40.0% ( 20.7% , 0.03) | 0.8% ( 8.1% , 0.07) | 28.5% ( -0.1% , 0.00) | 8 |
| MiMo-V2-Flash | 94.8% ( 19.2% , 0.02) | 46.7% ( 50.0% , 0.04) | 5.7% (-31.1%, -0.37) | 0.7% ( 0.4% , 1.03) | - |
| Grok-4.1-Fast | 99.3% (-11.7%, -0.17) | 37.1% (6.7%, 0.04) | 3.5% (-10.8%, -0.11) | 0.2% (-49.9%, -0.70) | - |
| GPT-OSS-120B | 99.9% (-17.8%, -0.22) | 39.4% (-19.3%, -0.21) | 1.1% ( -2.7% , -0.05) | 2.5% (-0.2%, -0.02) | - |
| DeepSeek-V3.2 | 98.4% (-10.9%, -0.03) | 34.0% (19.0%, 0.02) | 15.3% (-35.4%, -0.37) | 20.7% (-22.6%, -0.29) | - |
| Trinity-Large | 98.2% (-9.7%, -0.03) | 38.1% (16.6%, 0.01) | 5.4% (-10.3%, -0.10) | 0.6% (-38.5%, -0.71) | 103 |