Structural interpretability in SVMs with truncated orthogonal polynomial kernels

The performance of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) critically depends on the kernel function choice, which enables implicit mapping of data into high-dimensional feature spaces. While classical kernels like Radial Basis Function (RBF) remain popular, orthogonal polynomial kernels offer mathematically interpretable alternatives that can incorporate structured prior knowledge. This work extends the orthogonal polynomial kernel paradigm by introducing a novel family based on discrete $q$-Hermite I polynomials, a class of $q$-orthogonal polynomials that generalize classical Hermite polynomials through a deformation parameter $q$. We formally define the q-Hermite kernel and establish its validity under Mercer's theorem. The kernel's inherent boundedness properties naturally prevent annihilation and explosion effects without requiring explicit scaling mechanisms. Extensive experiments across 20 benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed kernel achieves competitive performance compared to both classical kernels and other orthogonal polynomial kernels, while offering advantages in numerical stability and computational simplicity. Our results confirm that $q$-orthogonal polynomials constitute a promising direction for kernel design, bridging mathematical elegance with practical machine learning applications, that provides conceptual and algorithmic resources that may be further extended to emerging quantum computing paradigms. To facilitate full reproducibility, we provide the complete implementation and experimental pipeline in an open-access GitHub repository at https://github.com/Kokechacho/SVMs-QSVMs.

The support vector machine (SVM) is a widely used classifier, but choosing an appropriate loss function remains difficult. Convex losses such as the hinge loss and least-squares loss are sensitive to outliers, while bounded non-convex losses often lead to high computational cost. To address this, we propose a hybrid truncated loss function ($L_{\mathrm{ht}}$) that is both sparse and bounded, and build the $L_{\mathrm{ht}}$-SVM model for single-view classification. We introduce the P-stationary point and use it to establish the first-order necessary and sufficient optimality conditions. Based on these conditions, we design an alternating direction method of multipliers with a working-set strategy that reduces computational cost and achieves global convergence. We further extend $L_{\mathrm{ht}}$-SVM to multi-view learning by adding structural information and view weights, resulting in Mv$L_{\mathrm{ht}}$-SVM, which follows both the consensus and complementarity principles. Experiments on synthetic, real-world, and image datasets show that $L_{\mathrm{ht}}$-SVM achieves higher accuracy with fewer support vectors and better noise robustness than five single-view methods, while Mv$L_{\mathrm{ht}}$-SVM outperforms six multi-view methods in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

Accurate optimization of a supervised spectral objective need not produce an accurate population subspace or a better predictive representation. We investigate these distinctions for Online Kernel Supervised Principal Component Analysis (OKSPCA), which combines a centered cross-moment in finite random-feature coordinates with an Adam-style orthonormal basis update for an established objective. Fixed-map consistency, concentration and perturbation results describe the estimator and its exact subspace; same-target comparisons then assess the practical iterate separately. Across six predictive benchmarks, performance depends on the declared pipeline: replacing the tracker with the exact empirical target leaves the two regression deficits largely unchanged. Direct classification-rank models capture nearly all terminal objective energy on average, but a saved intermediate state exhibits substantial geometric deviation; a controlled sample-size study further separates empirical accuracy from population recovery. In distinct numerical-service workloads, exact on-request computation is faster in the tested classification settings, whereas Adam saves time relative to the tested full thin-SVD service for some dense wider-regression requests, alongside persistent geometric error. These diagnostics limit explanations based solely on terminal optimization accuracy and distinguish numerical cost from quality, rank coverage and freshness; they establish neither practical-tracker convergence nor predictive or deployment benefits from basis availability.