Python library supporting Discrete Variational Formulations and training solutions with Collocation-based Robust Variational Physics Informed Neural Networks (DVF-CRVPINN)

Physics-informed neural networks and finite element methods provide two different paradigms for the numerical approximation of partial differential equations: the former are commonly trained by minimizing pointwise strong residuals, whereas the latter are naturally built from weak variational formulations and the finite-dimensional systems obtained after discretization. In this work, we introduce a common framework based on the discretization of functional Gauss--Newton problems by finite families of linear measurements. We show that, through an appropriate duality pairing, the linear measurements can be represented by test functions. The resulting Gauss--Newton system is then precisely a Petrov--Galerkin discretization of the linearized functional problem. This perspective recovers pointwise collocation and natural-gradient constructions as particular cases, while making the choice of test functions an explicit algorithmic design choice. We specialize this framework to elliptic problems, where it naturally leads to weak residual formulations and to a hybrid finite element--neural construction acting on complementary approximation spaces. Numerical experiments support the proposed framework and demonstrate the effectiveness of weak Gauss--Newton formulations and hybrid finite element--neural approximations.

The dual norm characterisation of weak solutions of second-order linear elliptic partial differential equations is mathematically natural but computationally intractable: evaluating the $H^{-1}$ norm of the residual requires a supremum over an infinite-dimensional test space. We prove that the $H^{-1}$ norm of any functional is equivalent to its expected squared evaluation against a random test function whose probability distribution depends only on the domain. Crucially, realisations of this random test function have negative Sobolev regularity for $d \geq 2$, yet this roughness is not an obstacle: averaging over the distribution exactly recovers the correct weak topology, independently of the differential operator, and no supremum evaluation is necessary. This equivalence introduces the notion of stochastically weak solutions, which coincide with classical weak solutions, and motivates stochastic variational physics-informed neural networks (SV-PINNs): neural networks trained by minimising an empirical approximation of the stochastic norm of the PDE residual. Although instantiated here with neural networks, the underlying principle is independent of the trial space and suggests a broader paradigm for numerical methods based on stochastic rather than deterministic test spaces. The framework extends naturally to higher-order elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic equations and to abstract operator equations on Hilbert spaces. As a proof of concept, we present numerical experiments on eight challenging second-order linear elliptic problems spanning high-frequency and multi-scale solutions, indefinite operators, variable coefficients, and non-standard domains, in which SV-PINNs consistently and significantly outperform standard PINNs, recovering solutions to within one percent relative error in hundreds of L-BFGS steps.

Uncertainty quantification for partial differential equations is traditionally grounded in discretization theory, where solution error is controlled via mesh/grid refinement. Physics-informed neural networks fundamentally depart from this paradigm: they approximate solutions by minimizing residual losses at collocation points, introducing new sources of error arising from optimization, sampling, representation, and overfitting. As a result, the generalization error in the solution space remains an open problem. Our main theoretical contribution establishes generalization bounds that connect residual control to solution-space error. We prove that when neural approximations lie in a compact subset of the solution space, vanishing residual error guarantees convergence to the true solution. We derive deterministic and probabilistic convergence results and provide certified generalization bounds translating residual, boundary, and initial errors into explicit solution error guarantees.