Accurate prediction of training time in distributed deep learning is crucial for resource allocation, cost estimation, and job scheduling. We observe that the floating-point precision setting is a key determinant of training time, leading to training time variations of ~2.4x over its minimum. However, existing studies on distributed training time prediction rely on static model computation graphs that do not capture precision variations, including mixed precision. According to our experiments, training time prediction without considering precision results in significant prediction errors - reaching up to 147.85% in mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). To address this issue, we propose a precision-aware distributed training time predictor that achieves robust accuracy across diverse precision settings, including mixed precision, with 9.8% MAPE.
Mixed-precision computation has been introduced in deep neural networks (DNNs) as an effective approach to reduce latency, energy consumption, and memory footprint. However, efficiently mapping mixed-precision networks onto multi-precision spatial architectures poses several challenges. These include determining the appropriate precision for each layer, balancing layer-wise accuracy sensitivity to quantization against architectural heterogeneity and system-level constraints, and accurately estimating the system-level cost of heterogeneous precision assignments. This work presents SEADA, an efficient methodology designed to address these challenges. SEADA comprises: (i) a configurable system-level analytical cost model of a multi-precision spatial accelerator architecture; (ii) a fast mapping tool that identifies near-optimal mappings of DNN workloads onto the target integer accelerator; (iii) analytical models for floating-point layers to estimate the overall benefits of mixed-precision execution; and (iv) a per-layer precision selection methodology based on bit-level entropy, enabling efficient assignment across multiple numerical precisions. SEADA's efficiency provides designers with a robust framework for the design-space exploration of multi-precision architectures.
Distributed machine learning (ML) training has become a necessity with the prevalence of billion to trillion-parameter-scale models. While prior work has improved training efficiency from the ML perspective at the application layer, it often fails to address transient congestion events at the network layer that introduce severe tail latency and training-time variability, thereby undermining the quality of service of distributed ML training systems. Existing network optimizations treat all gradients equally and thus fail to integrate sufficient model-training insights into communication protocol design. In this paper, we present Dynamic Bounded-Loss Protocol (DBLP), a burst-resilient, training-phase-aware, and hardware-agnostic transport protocol that incorporates model-level tolerance properties into gradient communication. By dynamically adjusting gradient loss tolerance across training phases, DBLP reduces overall training time and mitigates tail-latency collapse during transient high-loss events (i.e., microbursts). Compared to the current state-of-the-art solution (baseline), DBLP tolerates significantly higher loss while achieving comparable test accuracy, and reduces end-to-end training time by an average of 24.4% and a maximum of 33.9%. At microburst events, DBLP achieves up to 5.88x single-round communication latency speedups over the baseline, preventing burst-induced tail-latency spikes and maintaining stable training performance.
Large-scale model training increasingly relies on composing multiple parallelism strategies, such as data, pipeline, and expert parallelism, together with memory-saving optimizations like ZeRO. Deployed systems for foundation model pretraining often rely on human experts to manually design a high-level parallelism strategy then implement the corresponding low-level execution strategy, making it difficult to adapt the system to new strategies. Meanwhile, many general-purpose frameworks are more flexible but their implementations are still tied to a fixed set of common parallelism strategies, making it challenging to integrate state-of-the-art strategies. We present Piper, a user-controllable distributed training system that decouples the strategy from the runtime implementation. Piper allows users to declare a comprehensive distributed training strategy with a small set of model annotations and scheduling directives. Each directive applies a transformation on Piper's intermediate representation (IR), a unified global training DAG that represents all computation and communication. Using this IR, Piper compiles per-device execution plans and executes them with a distributed runtime agnostic to the strategy. We show that the combined system maintains performance parity on commonly available strategies such as ZeRO, while also enabling additional performance and memory efficiency gains through joint scheduling of compute and communication in composed parallelism strategies such as DeepSeek-V3's DualPipe.