Quantum error mitigation (QEM) provides a practical route for estimating reliable observables on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Traditional QEM strategies, including zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and Clifford data regression (CDR), rely on noise scaling or global regression, and their performance is constrained by the exponential growth of the system degrees of freedom. We construct a graph-enhanced mitigation (GEM) framework, which incorporates physical information into the model representation. In this work, quantum circuits are encoded as attributed graphs. Hardware-level physical information is mapped to node and edge features: local noise parameters such as calibration parameters T1, T2, and readout errors are encoded at nodes, while coupling-related information such as two-qubit gate errors is encoded as edge features. Graph neural networks are used to model how errors propagate along the physical coupling structure and build up into non-local correlations. This allows the model to capture local interactions and part of the resulting non-local correlations across qubits. A dual-branch affine correction is applied to maintain consistency with physical constraints. Experiments on 10-qubit and 16-qubit random circuits executed on superconducting quantum processors show that GEM provides a level of accuracy comparable to CDR at small scales, while yielding lower mean absolute error and improved stability in zero-shot transfer to larger systems. Results of the traditional QEM strategy indicate that global regression methods remain effective in low-dimensional settings but become less reliable as system degrees of freedom grow. In contrast, GEM makes use of local physical structures to show better scalability and generalization, while preserving the overall error propagation patterns. This work provides a practical scalable approach to QEM for NISQ devices.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is essential for extracting reliable results from near-term quantum devices, yet practical deployments must balance mitigation strength against runtime overhead under time-varying noise. We introduce \emph{GSC-QEMit}, a telemetry-driven, \textbf{context--forecast--bandit} framework for \emph{adaptive} mitigation that switches between lightweight suppression and heavier intervention as drift evolves. GSC-QEMit composes three coupled modules: (G) a Growing Hierarchical Self-Organizing Map (GHSOM) that clusters streaming telemetry into operating contexts; (S) an uncertainty-aware subsampled Gaussian-process forecaster that predicts short-horizon fidelity degradation; and (C) a cost-aware contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) that selects mitigation actions via Thompson sampling with explicit intervention cost. We evaluate GSC-QEMit on benchmark circuit families (GHZ, Quantum Fourier Transform, and Grover search) under nonstationary noise regimes simulated in Qiskit Aer, using an instrumented testbed where action labels correspond to graded mitigation intensity. Across Clifford, non-Clifford, and structured workloads, GSC-QEMit improves average logical fidelity by \textbf{+9.0%} relative to unmitigated execution while reducing unnecessary heavy interventions by reserving them for inferred noise spikes. The resulting policies exhibit a favorable fidelity--cost trade-off and transfer across the evaluated workloads without circuit-specific tuning.
Steven Szachara, Sheeraja Rajakrishnan, Dylan Jay Van Allen +3
How much does the noisy measurement add to learned quantum error mitigation? An accuracy table cannot say, because a model handed circuit structure can score well without reading the measurement at all. QEMScore adds the comparison that can. Each simulated circuit carries an exact ideal answer. The learned mitigator is scored beside a capacity-matched control, a model just as flexible that reads the same circuit description but never the measurement. Each method's measurement spend is accounted and not equalized. We run a controlled campaign on simulated circuits and reanalyze two published learned mitigators, Q-LEAR and QRAFT, from their released hardware data. Three findings stand out. First, under familiar within-family conditions (S0) evaluated across two spin-chain families and three seeds, continuous couplings identify the target, and the control that never reads the measurement matches 87.7 to 100.5 percent of the mitigator's gain over an affine fit to the circuit description. A plain polynomial in the coupling parameters, fitted after the campaign, beats the mitigator on all six evaluations, reflecting the selected learners' capacity. Second, for these selected learners, matching most of the gain is not matching the accuracy: on five of six evaluations the mitigator removes 19.5 to 74.5 percent of the error the capacity-matched control leaves, a learner-specific gap rather than a measurement requirement. Third, on released hardware data where descriptors only partially identify queries, the findings differ: flexible models of the descriptors show negligible mean gain over affine fits in Q-LEAR, and measurement inputs carry predictive gains in both Q-LEAR and QRAFT. These comparisons reflect representation- and protocol-specific behavior rather than an isolated cross-regime difference. A learned mitigator's accuracy should therefore be reported beside such controls.
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors are entering an early fault-tolerance regime where full quantum error correction carries prohibitive resource costs, yet lightweight error detection can meaningfully improve algorithmic success rates. Existing compilation and error-detection toolchains treat these concerns in isolation, with no principled way to balance detection overhead against success probability under latency constraints. We present an integrated hardware-aware compilation and data-driven quantum error-detection (QED) framework that jointly optimises qubit mapping, SWAP insertion, and syndrome-schedule placement via a noise-weighted cost function and a learned multi-objective scheduler. Simulation experiments on an HPC cluster using GPU-accelerated density-matrix simulation (NVIDIA cuQuantum SDK) across VQE, phase-estimation, and Grover benchmarks, three noise profiles, and circuit sizes of 6-20 qubits (depths 10-160), show that joint co-design raises algorithmic success probability by up to 68 percent (95 percent CI: 60 percent to 76 percent) over SABRE on an 8-qubit VQE instance with post-selection.