A Proxy Consistency Loss for Grounded Fusion of Earth Observation and Location Encoders

Earth observation is moving from foundation models that users must run themselves toward embedding products that package model feature outputs as reusable data without needing to download and process the imagery used to generate them. Earth embeddings are vectors that summarize locations, image patches, or pixels, letting users analyze compact features instead of repeatedly training or running large models on raw satellite imagery. This chapter explains the main types of Earth embeddings, from implicit location encoders to explicit patch and pixel products, and compares their coverage, resolution, dimensionality, storage cost, licenses, and reproducibility. We review their use in land cover and crop mapping, ecological and hazard modeling, socioeconomic prediction, and semantic search, with evidence on when embeddings improve on conventional features and when pooling, fusion, or spatial transfer limit performance. Two case studies show practical workflows for similarity search and land cover mapping. We close with guidance for choosing, evaluating, storing, compressing, and publishing embeddings, and with open problems in oceanic and atmospheric coverage, uncertainty, and benchmarking.

Earth embedding models transform Earth observation data into embeddings uniquely tied to locations on the Earth's surface. These models are typically evaluated in isolation, comparing the downstream task performance across different Earth embeddings. However, spatially aligned embeddings can naturally be fused, providing richer information per location, a capability that isolated evaluations fail to capture. We therefore propose assessing Earth embeddings by their complementarity: the performance gain of fused embeddings over the best single-model baseline. To operationalise this, we introduce an embedding complementarity index applicable to any embedding and task, and evaluate four Earth embedding models (AlphaEarth, Tessera, GeoCLIP, SatCLIP) in isolation, in all pairs, and jointly across six downstream tasks. Fused embeddings outperform the best single model in four out of six tasks, confirming that single-embedding evaluations often underestimate Earth embedding capabilities. Complementarity proves both task- and location-dependent. Further, for a land cover regression task, we find that complementarity is partially determined by the spatial scale of land cover classes. Complementarity reframes Earth embeddings: the greatest future gains may come not from any single Earth embedding model, but from combinations that are better together.

The plethora of readily available geospatial data offers exciting opportunities to learn high quality representations of the planet, but the sheer size of the Earth Observations (EO), differing modalities, and different sensor types pose significant challenges in doing so. Location encoders have emerged as an efficient way of compressing EOs into location-specific embeddings. However, current state-of-the-art location encoders rely on computationally expensive CLIP-style frameworks that require large batch sizes in the 16K--32K range, suffer from false negative samples, and scale poorly with additional modalities. We introduce the Scalable Location Encoder via Distillation (SLED), a distillation-based location encoder that uses geospatial location as a binding modality to pretrain location encoders with any modality of geospatial data. The resulting location encoder framework is lightweight, modular, and can flexibly incorporate multiple modes, while eliminating the need for spatiotemporal coregistration of samples. SLED is performant with batch sizes as small as 128, enabling pretraining at a fraction of the runtime and compute costs of current state-of-the-art models. We demonstrate our approach by pretraining unimodal and multimodal SLED models on Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Landsat imagery. We show that both unimodal and multimodal SLED models keep pace with or outperform existing approaches on a diverse set of 19 human-centric benchmark tasks and explore the benefits of using additional modes in pretraining.