How Far Are Video Models from True Multimodal Reasoning?

Modern multimodal generative models can synthesize visually compelling images and videos, but it remains unclear whether this visual fluency reflects genuine reasoning: when prompted to generate a solution, can a model preserve the physical, logical, spatial, and temporal constraints a task requires, or does it merely produce plausible-looking media? To answer this question, we introduce MMGR (Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation), a benchmark for evaluating generative reasoning across video, image, and language-based systems. MMGR covers 10 tasks from three domains (Abstract Reasoning, Embodied Navigation, and Physical Commonsense) and probes five reasoning abilities: Physical, Logical, 2D Spatial, 3D Spatial, and Temporal. Its evaluation emphasizes answer-verifiable tasks and, for video generation, process-aware chain-of-frame reasoning, where intermediate frames must form valid steps toward the target outcome rather than visually smooth but incorrect transitions. Evaluating state-of-the-art video generators, image generators, and LLM/VLM baselines reveals a sharp gap between visual quality and reasoning correctness: video models perform best on Physical Commonsense, but remain weak on symbolic tasks such as Sudoku, ARC, and Math, and brittle in cross-view embodied navigation. Image generators often outperform video generators on embodied navigation despite lacking temporal outputs, showing that longer visual generation does not automatically yield stronger reasoning. MMGR reframes evaluation of multimodal generation from whether outputs look realistic to whether they solve the underlying reasoning problem.

Video generation has advanced to produce visually compelling and temporally coherent results. Yet, whether these models can genuinely think with video--executing symbolic rules, respecting physical laws, and pursuing intentional goals--remains an open question. Existing benchmarks only partially address this, often conflating visual quality with cognitive correctness. We introduce VWG-Bench (Video World Generalist Benchmark), a comprehensive benchmark spanning 9 reasoning dimensions and 38 fine-grained tasks. To enable precise diagnosis, we design a three-level VLM-as-Judge protocol that independently assesses video-level fluency, task-level rule adherence, and sample-level goal realization. Evaluations of leading models reveal a striking gap: while models achieve strong rendering scores, they consistently fail on logic-heavy and rule-constrained tasks. To address this, we propose Vid-PRE (Video Prompt Reasoner and Enhancer), a model-agnostic prompt rewriter that offloads the cognitive burden of reasoning to a dedicated VLM. Trained via reinforcement learning with purely text-based rewards, Vid-PRE produces concise, constraint-aware prompts without the instability of video-level reward signals. Experiments show that Vid-PRE yields substantial reasoning improvements across multiple generators without architectural modifications. Together, VWG-Bench and Vid-PRE offer a rigorous diagnostic lens and a scalable path toward true think-with-video capabilities. All data and code are publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/KlingTeam/VWG-Bench.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have made rapid progress in single-video understanding, yet their ability to reason across multiple independent video streams remains poorly understood. Existing multi-video benchmarks rely largely on human-annotated real-world footage, limiting the precision of spatial, temporal, and physical ground truth and making it difficult to diagnose model failures. We introduce SYNCR, a controlled synthetic benchmark for cross-video reasoning with programmatically verified grounding. Built using Habitat, Kubric, and CLEVRER simulator engines, SYNCR contains 8,163 multi-video question-answer pairs grounded in 9,650 unique videos. It evaluates MLLMs across eight tasks spanning four diagnostic pillars: Temporal Alignment, Spatial Tracking, Comparative Reasoning, and Holistic Synthesis. Our zero-shot evaluation of leading open- and closed-weight MLLMs reveals a substantial gap between current models and humans: the best model achieves only 52.5% average accuracy, compared to an 89.5% human baseline. Models perform relatively well on temporal ordering but struggle with precise physical and spatial reasoning, with the best model reaching only 26.0% accuracy on Kinematic Comparison. We further find that parameter scaling and reasoning-specialized post-training improve temporal alignment capabilities, but do not reliably address fine-grained physical tracking or global spatial synthesis. Finally, an exploratory sim-to-real correlation analysis suggests that several SYNCR tasks track model-level trends on real-world multi-video benchmarks, while also exposing reasoning capabilities underrepresented by existing evaluations. Code available at https://github.com/SaraGhazanfari/SYNCR.