cs.LGMar 23, 2026
SaveTransparent Screening for LLM Inference and Training Impacts
Organizations: Emotia, Paris, France
Abstract
This paper presents a transparent screening framework for estimating inference and training impacts of current large language models under limited observability. The framework converts natural-language application descriptions into bounded environmental estimates and supports a comparative online observatory of current market models. Rather than claiming direct measurement for opaque proprietary services, it provides an auditable, source-linked proxy methodology designed to improve comparability, transparency, and reproducibility.
Figures & tables
| Case | Energy | Carbon | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ministral 3B, one standardized request | 0.0056 Wh | 0.0002 gCO 2 e | Small hybrid model under a French provider-country proxy |
| GPT-5 mini, one standardized request | 0.1706 Wh | 0.0657 gCO 2 e | Medium proprietary hosted model under a US provider-country proxy |
| Claude Opus 4.1, one standardized request | 2.9922 Wh | 1.1520 gCO 2 e | Very large proprietary estimate illustrating the steep growth of screening orders of magnitude |
| Support chatbot, Ministral 8B, 20,000 conversations/month | 2.38 kWh/year | 96 gCO 2 e/year | Low-carbon annual result despite high usage because the retained electricity factor is favorable |
| Retrieval assistant, GPT-5 mini, 4,000 uses/month | 12.31 kWh/year | 4.74 kgCO 2 e/year | Higher annualized result driven by hosted-service assumptions and US electricity contextualization |
Table 1: Illustrative outputs from the current observatory and application estimator. These values are screening estimates, not audited declarations.
| Model | Inference Wh/request | Inference gCO 2 e/request | Training GWh | Interpretation |
| Claude Opus 4.1 | 2.9922 | 1.1520 | 125.63 | Upper-end proprietary model with very large screening values for both inference and training |
| GPT-5.2 | 2.7897 | 1.0740 | 101.76 | Frontier proprietary model illustrating the high end of current screening estimates |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 0.3601 | 0.1387 | 1.26 | Upper-mid-range model with markedly lower screening values than the top tier |
| GPT-5 mini | 0.1706 | 0.0657 | 0.28 | Medium model representative of lighter hosted deployments |
| Llama 3.1 70B | 0.1043 | 0.0402 | 0.16 | Large open-weight model with moderate inference estimates |
| GPT-4o mini | 0.0155 | 0.0060 | 0.0027 | Lightweight hosted model with low per-request screening impacts |
Table 2: Representative subset of observatory results spanning the current market-model catalog. Inference values correspond to the central prompt-level proxy retained by the observatory, expressed per standardized request. Training values are multi-factor screening estimates; additional decimals are shown for small training values to avoid false zeros from rounding.
More in this topic
LLM Auditing
Large language model auditing tests models and deployed systems for bias, safety, privacy, reliability, and provenance using behavioral and internal evidence.
See all 639 papersAssessing whether Large Language Models outputs are factually grounded, epistemically calibrated, and methodologically reproducible is a prerequisite for responsible AI deployment. Yet auditing LLMs remains inaccessible to non-technical practitioners: existing tools require programming expertise and non-trivial environment setup, and cloud-hosted platforms transmit evaluation data to external services, creating barriers for domain experts and compliance officers legally responsible for AI oversight. We introduce LLM-FACETS (LLM FActuality Cross-EvaluaTion System): an open-source framework with a browser-accessible interface and a plugin architecture, structured around three practitioner profiles (technical experts, domain experts, compliance officers) that mirror the stakeholder categories identified in the EU AI Act and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. The architecture makes data flows explicit: deterministic metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore) run entirely within the self-hosted server with no outbound transmission; LLM-judge metrics contact external APIs explicitly, with users retaining full credential control. The framework operationalizes transparency through three mechanisms: token-level log-probability visualization for epistemic uncertainty, multi-judge consensus to mitigate judge bias, and RAG Triad metrics (Faithfulness, Answer Relevance, Context Relevance) to detect and localize hallucinations. A plugin architecture allows any new metric or dataset to be integrated without modifying the evaluation pipeline. The open-source implementation enables cross-checking across multiple metrics targeting the same property, ensuring reproducibility and decoupling AI accountability from the teams building the systems assessed. We verify the framework through cross-validation of 18 metric implementations against canonical reference libraries.
Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms Enable Cheap Verifiable Inference of LLMs
As large language models (LLMs) continue to grow in size, fewer users are able to host and run models locally. This has led to increased use of third-party hosting services. However, in this setting, there is a lack of guarantees on the computation performed by the inference provider. For example, a dishonest provider may replace an expensive large model with a cheaper-to-run weaker model and return the results from the weaker model to the user. Existing tools to verify inference typically rely on methods from cryptography such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), but these add significant computational overhead, and remain infeasible for use for large models. In this work, we develop a new insight -- that given a method for performing private LLM inference, one can obtain forms of verified inference at marginal extra cost. Specifically, we propose two new protocols which leverage privacy-preserving LLM inference in order to provide guarantees over the inference that was carried out. Our approaches are cheap, requiring the addition of a few extra tokens of computation, and have little to no downstream impact. As the fastest privacy-preserving inference methods are typically faster than ZK methods, the proposed protocols also improve verification runtime. Our work provides novel insights into the connections between privacy and verifiability in LLM inference.
IMMACULATE: A Practical LLM Auditing Framework via Verifiable Computation
Commercial large language models are typically deployed as black-box API services, requiring users to trust providers to execute inference correctly and report token usage honestly. We present IMMACULATE, a practical auditing framework that detects economically motivated deviations-such as model substitution, quantization abuse, and token overbilling-without trusted hardware or access to model internals. IMMACULATE selectively audits a small fraction of requests using verifiable computation, achieving strong detection guarantees while amortizing cryptographic overhead. Experiments on dense and MoE models show that IMMACULATE reliably distinguishes benign and malicious executions with under 1% throughput overhead. Our code is published at https://github.com/guo-yanpei/Immaculate.