Explainable Speech Emotion Recognition: Weighted Attribute Fairness to Model Demographic Contributions to Social Bias

Speech emotion recognition (SER) systems can exhibit gender-related performance disparities, but how such bias manifests in multilingual speech LLMs across languages and modalities is unclear. We introduce a novel multilingual, multimodal benchmark built on MELD-ST, spanning English, Japanese, and German, to quantify language-specific SER performance and gender gaps. We find bias is strongly language-dependent, and multimodal fusion does not reliably improve fairness. To address these, we propose ERM-MinMaxGAP, a fairness-informed training objective, which augments empirical risk minimization (ERM) with a proposed adaptive fairness weight mechanism and a novel MinMaxGAP regularizer on the maximum male-female loss gap within each language and modality. Building upon the Qwen2-Audio backbone, our ERM-MinMaxGAP approach improves multilingual SER performance by 5.5% and 5.0% while reducing the overall gender bias gap by 0.1% and 1.4% in the unimodal and multimodal settings, respectively.

Speech emotion recognition (SER) is the task of assigning emotion labels to utterances. Early systems relied on acoustic features, whereas recent approaches combine multiple modalities, most commonly speech and text. Still, performance remains poor on many datasets. Large language models (LLMs) have therefore attracted interest for SER, as they can process diverse inputs jointly with instructions. However, direct audio input raises questions of explainability. To address similar questions in image classification, concept bottleneck models were introduced. This work adapts concept bottlenecks to SER to examine how individual predictions depend on transcripts, acoustic descriptions and speaker attributes. Experiments test three LLMs on CREMA-D, IEMOCAP and MELD, with concepts extracted by separate tools. On scripted corpora, LLMs are strongly biased towards the transcript in the zero-shot setting, which lowers Macro-F1 from 27.8 to 5.8 on CREMA-D. Fine-tuning removes this bias, and the transcript raises Macro-F1 from 41.8 to 45.1. Removing speech rate changes 48% of Neutral predictions to Disgust on CREMA-D; removing intensity level on MELD changes predictions despite little change in Macro-F1. These findings show that aggregate performance changes alone do not capture the effects of concept removal on individual predictions.

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have seen increasing use for audio understanding tasks such as speech recognition and audio question answering, raising concerns about fairness across demographic subgroups. Fairness evaluation in spoken-input settings is challenging due to confounding factors, including semantic variation in spoken content and speaker-specific characteristics. Ignoring these factors can result in misleading conclusions about model bias. We propose a semantic-aware mixed-effects regression framework for fairness evaluation in LALMs that explicitly accounts for these confounders. Our approach incorporates sentence-level semantic embeddings of reference text as covariates and models speaker identity as a random effect. Notably, semantic representations are extracted from the same LALM under evaluation, enabling semantic control over variation as perceived by the model itself. Experiments on simulated data and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially reduces spurious fairness findings and yields more robust and interpretable estimates of subgroup performance differences.