cs.NEApr 22, 2026

Learning Hippo: Multi-attractor Dynamics and Stability Effects in a Biologically Detailed CA3 Extension of Hopfield Networks

Authors: Daniele CorradettiRenato Corradetti

Organizations: Grupo de Física Matemática Instituto Superior Técnico Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal · Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psicologia, Area del Farmaco e Salute del Bambino (NEUROFARBA) Università di Firenze, Italy22

Abstract

We present a biologically detailed extension of the classical Hopfield/Marr auto-associative memory model for CA3, implementing ten populations (two asymmetric pyramidal subtypes, eight GABAergic interneuron classes), forty-seven compartments, multi-rule plasticity (recurrent Hebb, BCM anti-saturation, mossy-fiber short-term, endocannabinoid iLTD, burst-gated Hebb), and a bimodal cholinergic encoding/consolidation cycle. Evaluated on pattern completion across auto-associative, associative, and temporal regimes, and on a controlled inhibitory-proportion manipulation at N=256N{=}256, the full architecture exhibits \emph{three qualitative signatures absent from a minimal Hopfield baseline}: (i)~multi-attractor cross-seed behaviour at K=5K{=}5 with biologically realistic inhibitory proportions, where two of five seeds converge to positive attractors with margin +0.100.22{+}0.10{-}0.22 (Cohen's d=0.71d{=}0.71, one-sided p=0.08p{=}0.08); (ii)~target-selective associative recall in paired (A,B)(A, B) memory at K5K{\geq}5, where the full model retrieves BB from a partial cue of AA while the minimal model echoes AA (Pearson margin Δ=+0.163Δ{=}{+}0.163 at K=5K{=}5); (iii)~reduced cross-seed variance of the full model below the minimal baseline under clean upstream, with ratios 1.03.01.0{-}3.0. These three signatures are architecture-specific: they appear consistently across independent regimes and are absent from the minimal control.

Explore similar work

CardsList