Organizations: School of Informatics, Xiamen University, China · 2Key Lab of Digital Protection and Intelligent Processing of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Fujian-Taiwan (XMU), Ministry of Culture and Tourism, China · 3National Language Resources Monitoring and Research Center for Education and Teaching Media, Xiamen University, China
Sign language research has achieved significant progress due to the advances in large language models (LLMs). However, the intrinsic ability of LLMs to understand sign language, especially in multimodal contexts, remains underexplored. To address this limitation, we introduce CNSL-bench, the first comprehensive Chinese em{National Sign Language benchmark designed for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in sign language understanding. The proposed CNSL-bench is characterized by: 1) Authoritative grounding, as it is anchored to the officially standardized \textit{National Common Sign Language Dictionary, mitigating ambiguity from regional or non-canonical variants and ensuring consistent semantic definitions; 2) Multimodal coverage, providing aligned textual descriptions, illustrative images, and sign language videos; and 3) Articulatory diversity, supporting fine-grained analysis across key manual articulatory forms, including air-writing, finger-spelling, and the Chinese manual-alphabet. Using CNSL-bench, we extensively evaluate 21 open-source and proprietary up-to-date MLLMs. Our results reveal that, despite recent advances in multimodal modeling, current MLLMs remain substantially inferior to human performance, exhibiting systematic disparities across input modalities and manual articulatory forms. Additional diagnostic analyses suggest that several performance limitations persist beyond improvements in reasoning and that instruction-following robustness varies substantially across models.
Automated Sign Language Recognition for under-represented languages remains a largely unsolved problem. Central African Sign Language (CASL) exemplifies this gap: the only available bench-mark, CASL-W60, has a best reported accuracy of 69.93%, and we show that the common heuristic of fine-tuning high-resource models fails to close it. This failure stems from two compounding factors: the limited scale of available CASL data and the significant lexical and visual domain gap between CASL and large-scale corpora such as WLASL, which renders pre-trained representations largely uninformative. To address this, we propose TransSLR, a lightweight Temporal Transformer Encoder trained from scratch on 64-frame normalized pose sequences, with average pooling and a classification head. By operating on geometric keypoint representations rather than raw RGB, TransSLR achieves signer-independent generalization without relying on visual appearance. On the CASL-W60 benchmark, TransSLR establishes a new state-of-the-art accuracy of 80.39%, surpassing the prior best by +10.46%. Beyond accuracy, our encoder-only design significantly reduces computational overhead, making deployment feasible in resource-constrained environments. We conduct extensive experiments on the CASL-W60 benchmark, comparing against RGB-based and multimodal baselines, and demonstrate that TransSLR achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Lucia Yen Wanchi, Samuel Johnny, Victor Tolulope Olufemi +2
BLEU-4 is the standard metric for evaluating sign language translation (SLT), but spoken-language metrics may not adequately reflect sign language proficiency. The multimodal, low-resource context of SLT allows models to exploit spurious correlations and spoken-language priors, rather than learning stronger sign representations. In this paper, we evaluate the relationship between spatio-temporal understanding and BLEU-4 across six SLT models on Phoenix-2014T and CSL-Daily, showing that gains in BLEU-4 are not on their own evidence of better sign language understanding. This work introduces an alternative inspired by language-learning assessment, using an open-weight-LLM QA protocol that measures salient content preservation. It aligns more closely with human rankings and is six to seven times more paraphrase-invariant than BLEU-4. Applied to SLT, this protocol targets content transfer, is more robust to train-test overlap, and gives a different picture of the field: the five gloss-free systems are largely within noise of one another on Phoenix-2014T, while the gloss-supervised system stands 9.3 points higher, a gap invisible to BLEU-4.
Recent advances in sign language (SL) understanding (SLU) have led to remarkable progress in tasks such as continuous SL recognition and SL translation. However, these tasks are designed with predefined objectives, requiring models to learn a fixed mapping from sign videos to glosses or spoken-language sentences. As a result, they provide only a limited assessment of whether a model truly understands the semantic content of SL videos. To address this limitation, \textbf{we first propose a new task, Sign Language Question Answering (SLQA)}, which evaluates SL understanding by requiring models to answer arbitrary natural language questions about SL videos. Unlike previous SLU tasks, SLQA provides a more flexible and comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses multiple reasoning capabilities beyond recognition and translation. To facilitate this task, \textbf{we further construct two SignQA benchmarks} based on PHOENIX14T and CSL-Daily by automatically generating question-answer pairs from existing gloss and sentence annotations using carefully designed templates. The resulting datasets cover five complementary question categories, including position reasoning, structural reasoning, visual search, gloss recognition, and translation understanding. \textbf{Finally, we propose a simple yet effective baseline model} equipped with a Question-Conditioned Modulated Temporal Downsampling module and an in-domain knowledge transfer strategy, enabling effective knowledge transfer from existing SLU tasks while enhancing question-aware temporal feature modeling. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our baseline consistently outperforms representative vision-language models across all question categories, establishing a strong benchmark for future research on SLQA. Datasets are available at:{https://huggingface.co/datasets/hulala/SignQA-2026}.