Time-Localized Parametric Decomposition of Respiratory Airflow for Sub-Breath Analysis

Bronchoscopic navigation relies on registering endoscopic video to a preoperative CT scan, but respiratory motion deforms the airway by 5-20 mm, creating CT-to-body divergence that limits localization accuracy. In practice, this is mitigated through breath-hold protocols, which attempt to match the intraoperative anatomy to a static CT, but are difficult to reproduce and disrupt clinical workflow. We propose to eliminate the need for breath-hold protocols by leveraging patient-specific respiratory modeling. Paired inhale-exhale CT scans, already acquired for planning, implicitly define the patient-specific deformation space of the breathing airway. By registering these scans, we reduce respiratory motion to a single scalar breathing phase per frame, constraining all reconstructions to anatomically observed configurations. We embed this representation within a mesh-anchored Gaussian splatting framework, where a lightweight estimator infers breathing phase directly from endoscopic RGB, enabling continuous, deformation-aware reconstruction throughout the respiratory cycle without breath-holds or external sensing. To enable quantitative evaluation, we introduce RESPIRE, a physically grounded bronchoscopy simulation pipeline with per-frame ground truth for geometry, pose, breathing phase, and deformation. Experiments on RESPIRE show that our approach achieves geometrically faithful reconstruction, over 20x faster training, and 1.22 mm target localization accuracy (within the 3mm clinically relevant tolerances) outperforming unconstrained single-CT baselines. Please check out our website for additional visuals: https://asdunnbe.github.io/RESPIRE/

Respiratory activity is a direct and interpretable physiological channel for wearable stress and affective-state recognition, yet many studies emphasize classification accuracy without identifying which respiratory properties separate different states. Using the chest respiratory channel of the WESAD dataset, we analyze 60 s windows under leave-one-subject-out validation and combine two complementary branches: compact raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and physically grouped handcrafted respiratory signatures. The primary task is stress versus non-stress detection, while baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation are additionally analyzed in a one-vs-rest setting to reveal state-specific respiratory markers. The feature space is organized into respiratory timing, breath-to-breath variability, waveform statistics, spectral/time-frequency descriptors, and autocorrelation/nonlinear predictability descriptors, with the raw 60 s signal treated as a sixth representation for the CNN branch. We introduce autocorrelation transition lags (Zpm/Zmp) as interpretable markers of respiratory correlation scale and separately evaluate exploratory forecast-error-growth/Lyapunov-like descriptors. In the final CNN refit setting, the raw-signal model achieved the strongest stress-vs-rest performance (accuracy 96.72%, macro-F1 95.30%, MCC 90.61%). In contrast, compact feature models were stronger for baseline (MCC 65.34%), amusement (MCC 35.69%), and especially meditation (MCC 88.65%). Strict nested reanalysis of the auxiliary Top-20 stress search yielded mean MCC=82.29% versus 85.45% originally, indicating modest selection optimism. These results show that CNNs are most useful for the practical stress detector, whereas interpretable respiratory signatures provide stronger and more physiologically transparent state-specific markers for several non-stress conditions.

This study aims to explore the performance of the VAR model in comparison with mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) matrices and log-mel spectrograms using deep learning. In pulmonary sound classification, spectrogram-based representations suffer from inconsistent temporal dimensions due to varying respiratory cycle durations. Along with traditional trimming/zero-padding, adaptive-length windowing was presented to fix their temporal dimensions. Their spectral and temporal dimensions were optimized by testing a range of parameters. Different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were employed to extract features from the two-dimensional representations obtained over the sub-phases. The extracted sub-phase features were then fused using various strategies including direct concatenation, gated recurrent unit (GRU) network and GRU with attention mechanism. Model performances were assessed through respiratory cycle-based evaluation and subject-based evaluation comprising multiple respiratory cycles. Several data augmentation techniques were also studied to cope with limitations in data size. The best cycle-based F1-score (0.877) was obtained using the MFCC matrices with thirteen coefficients and 64-point time resolution per sub-phase representation followed by direct feature concatenation, and the best subject-based F1-score (0.855) was obtained using the MFCC matrices with thirteen coefficients and 256-point time resolution per full-cycle representation, both obtained by adaptive-length windowing. Augmentation degraded the performance of models overall, yet mixup augmentation was the best among the methods tested. MFCC outperformed log-mel spectrogram and VAR model in differentiation of asthma and COPD. Sophisticated fusion strategies did not improve the diagnosis. Augmentation did not contribute, demonstrating the significance of authentic data in pulmonary sound studies.